Advanced Search Results

Shyamrao S/O Kewalram Kapgate and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and or ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 52, 61A and 61G; Bombay Transit of Forest Porduce (Vidarbha Region, Saurashtra and Kutch Areas) Rules, 1960 - Rule 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 457

Reported in : 2003(4)MhLj181

trolley which was seized by the Forest Officer in exercise of powers under Section 52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the Act'). The challenge is on two grounds, namely, that the transportation

The State of Bihar and anr. Vs. Kedar Sao and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment) Act, 1990 - Sections 2(3), 2(4), 5, 6, 32, 33(1), 41, 41(1), 42, 42(1), 52, 52(3), 52(4), 52(5), 52A, 52B, 52C, 52D, 53C, 55 and 61; Bihar Forest Produce (Regulation of Trade) Act, 1984 - Sections 1(3), 1(4), 14, 15, 17, 20, 21, 28 and 32; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 29(2) and 30; Bihar Timber and other Forest Produce Regulation of Transit Rules, 1973; Bihar Kendu Leaves (Control of Trade) Act, 1973; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 102 and 103; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954; Fruit Products Order, 1955

Reported in : AIR2003SC3650; 2003(2)ALD(Cri)670; 2003CriLJ4903; JT2003(7)SC276; 2003(6)SCALE639; (2004)9SCC344

to the case by virtue of Section 32 of the said Act and the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 stood excluded and consequently the Authorities under the central enactment had no powers to confiscate the vehicle and … 7233 and seized about 445 Kgs. of illicit Katha together with the truck in exercise of powers under Section 52 of the Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment) Act, 1990 (hereinafter referred to as 'Bihar Amendment Act, 1990') near Danapur,

Range Forest Officer and anr. Vs. Sahebrao Sampatrao Ningot

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 52, 52(1) and 61G; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : 2003(4)MhLj71

bullock-cart which were seized by the Forest Officers in exercise of powers under Section 52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter called as 'the said Act'). The contention of the petitioners is that the said pair of bullocks

State (Represented by Range Forest Officer) Vs. Shri Rajesh Gaonkar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 52(2), 53, 54, 55, 61-A and 69; Goa Amendment Act, 1988; Preservation of Tree Act, 1986 - Sections 66; Goa, Daman and Diu Forest Rules, 1964 - Rule 22

Reported in : 2000(5)BomCR581

report of the circumstances to his superior officer.'The reference to sections in this Independent is to the Indian Forest Act, 1927 as amended by Goa Amendment Act, 1988. Section 53 provides for release of properties seized under section 52

State of Gujarat Vs. Rathod Manpritsinh Mahendrasinh

Court : Gujarat

Subject : CriminalEnvironment

Acts : Indian Forests Act, 1927 - Sections 41, 52, 61(A), 61(B), 61(B)(2), 61(D), 61(D)(2), 66, 67 and 68; Limitation Act - Sections 5; Minimum Wages Act - Sections 20; Bombay Forest Rules, 1942 - Rule 66; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 320(8); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4052

hence the wood as well as the offending vehicle were seized under Section 52 of the Indian Forests Act, 1927 (for short 'the Act'). The driver and the cleaner of the vehicle fled away leaving the offending vehicle … that case, the Learned Sessions Judge failed to look to the relevant provisions of section 61(B) of the Forest Act while deciding the appeal. It has been further held that though under Article 227 of the Constitution of

State of Jharkhand and anr. Vs. Govind Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 26, 33, 52, 52(3), 52(4), 52(5), 63 and 68; Bihar Forest (Amendment) Act, 1990; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2005SC294; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)398; 2004(52)BLJR2340; [2005(1)JCR1(SC)]; JT2004(10)SC349; 2005(1)KLT34(SC); 2004(10)SCALE174; (2005)10SCC437

Matched in: Citation AIR2005SC294; 2005(1)ALD(Cri)398; 2004(52)BLJR2340; [2005(1)JCR1(SC)]; JT2004(10)SC349; 2005(1)KLT34(SC); 2004(10)SCALE174; (2005)10SCC437

State of M.P. Vs. S.P. Sales Agencies and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 2(3), 2(4), 20, 41, 42, 44(2), 44(2A), 52, 52A, 52B, 76; Madhya Pradesh Transit (Forest Produce) Rules, 1961- Rules 3, 29 and 29(1); Himachal Pradesh Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1969 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR2004SC2088; 2004(3)ALD134(SC); 2004CriLJ1832; JT2004(4)SC245; 2004(4)SCALE52; (2004)4SCC448

allowed and seizure of stock of kattha and cutch under the provisions of Section 52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 ('Act' for short) for violation of provisions of Rule 3 of Madhya Pradesh Transit (Forest Produce) Rules, 1961

Dilip Kumar Pandey Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Environment

provision relating to confiscation in Bihar Forest Produce (Regulation of Trade) Act, 1984, the confiscation made under Indian Forest Act, 1927 (hereinafter referred to as 'Central Act') was a valid or not and as to whether pending confiscation proceeding … and AIR 1967 SC 276, has agreed with the submission made on behalf of the petitioner that though Section 52(3) of the Forest Act does not provide for imposition of fine in lieu of confiscation, such a provision

State of Maharashtra and Etc. Vs. Suja Karan Rabbani and Etc.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Forests Act, 1927 - Sections 2(4), 26(1), 32(1), 52(1), 55(1), 59, 61-A, 61-C, 61-G and 68; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 457; Bombay Forest Rules, 1942; Indian Forest (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 2000(5)BomCR899; 2000CriLJ664

the protected forest. The Forest Officer, who had seized those cattle under section 52(1) of the Indian Forests Act, 1927 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') also found that those cattle ate and damaged forest produce such as

State of M.P. Vs. Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009(1)MPHT33

whereby, the Revisional Court while affirming the order passed by the Appellate Authority under Section 52-A of the Forest Act, 1927, has directed the release of the truck which seized being involved in the forest offence.2. The facts in