Advanced Search Results

U.R. Mavinkurve Vs. Thakor Madhavsinghji Gambhirsingh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 3; Jagirs Abolition Act - Sections 2(2), 5, 8, 9 and 11; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 10 and 34(A); Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 3(16), 3(17), 3(19) and 40; Bombay Act, 1865; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1965SC1747; [1965]3SCR177

of individuals legally subsisting. .....................................'9. Section 9 reads : '9. The rights to trees specially reserved under theIndian Forest Act, 1927, or any other law for the time being in force, exceptthose the ownership of which has been transferred … 'Occupancy' to mean a portionof land held by an occupant. Under s. 3(19) of the Code 'Occupation'means possession. Section 40 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code provides asfollows : '40. In villages, orportions of villages, of which the

Rajiv SarIn and anr Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Kumaun and Uttarakhand Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1960 - Section 4A, 18(1)(cc), 19(1)(b), 3(10), 8; UP Amendment Act 1978 ; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 ; Indian Forests Act 1927 - Section 36, 37, 84; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 40; Government of India Act. - Section 76, 107(2); Constitution of India. - Article 254, 31(2), 300A; Punjab Act - Section 10

senior counsel appearing for the appellants raised two contentions in the context of the inter-relation of the Indian Forest Act 1927 and the KUZALR Act; firstly, the case of alleged discrimination in as much as the Central Act i.e. … such acquisition is envisaged in the Act as not public purpose but for the purpose specifically enumerated in Section 40 of the Land Acquisition Act. But, in case of both the aforesaid manner of acquisition of land, the

Thakoreshri Maharasinghji Dolatsinghji and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 3(4) and (16), 40 and 216(2); Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagirs Abolition) Act, 1953 - Sections 2, 5(1), 8 and 9; Gujarat Private Forests (Acquisition) Act, 1972; Indian Forest Act, 1927; Bombay Merged Territories and Areas (Jagirs Abolition) (Amendment) Act - Sections 8; Bombay Land Revenue (Amendment) Code, 1936; Bombay Land Revenue (Amendment) Code, 1948

Reported in : AIR1980SC59; (1979)4SCC291; [1980]1SCR290; 1979(11)LC769(SC)

private forest. Neither it was a reserved forest nor a protected forest within the meaning of the Indian Forest Act, 1927. Mr. M.N. Shroff appearing for the State of Gujarat drew our attention to the Gujarat Private Forests (Acquisition) … settlement the person aforesaid could not fall back upon any provision of the Land Revenue Code, such as, Section 40 or Section 41 for claiming a right in the trees. In our opinion the view so expressed by

Shyamsunder Tikam Shet and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Khoti Abolition Act, 1949

Reported in : AIR1970SC381; (1971)73BOMLR98; (1969)3SCC217; [1970]2SCR801

10 deals with the right to trees and states :The rights to trees specially reserved under the Indian Forest Act, 1927, or any other law for the time being in force except those the ownership of which has been … facts of that case it was held that the khots had no claim to the teak trees under Section 40 of the Land Revenue Code and they had failed to prove that they were entitled to the benefit

In Re: Zudpi Jungle Lands versus

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1480

Matched in: Judge BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI * , AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH 1480 : 2025 INSC 754 In Re: Zudpi Jungle Lands [(I.A. No. 12465 of 2019 with I.A. No. 98194 of 2019, I.A. No. 127871 of 2020, I.A. No. 127874 of 2020, I.A. No. 44062 of 2025, I.A. No. 66986 and 74569 of 2025) In (Writ Petition (C) No. 202 of 1995)] In Re: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of Issue pertains to the status of Zudpi Jungle or Zudpi Forest in the six districts of State of Maharashtra; and whether the recommendations made by the CEC in its 2025 Report should be accepted or not. …

ishwar Chandra Gupta and ors Vs. State of U.P. and ors

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Section 2, 3, 3A, 3B, 4, 4A, 12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 13, 13A, 13B, 16, 19 ; U.P. Societies Registration Rules, 1976 - Rule 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19

The Prescribed Authority has passed the order in exercise of power provided under Section 61-B(2) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (as amended vide The Indian Forest (Uttar Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2000) as well as under Section 34-A of … Court in the case of Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner 2, reported in 1978 (1) SCC 405 has held that the order must be supported with the reasons as the order passed by the public

Kaviraj Ramlal Chaturbhuj Vs. Prant Officer, Dahod Prant and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1984)2GLR1477

of that case that on 6-7-1956, the State Government issued a notification under Section 34(A) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 declaring all uncultivated lands in the said 39 villages to be forests for the purposes of Ch. 5 … settlement the person aforesaid could not fall back upon any provision of the Land Revenue Code, such as, Section 40 or Section 41 for claiming a right in the trees. In our opinion, the view so expressed by

State of M.P. Vs. Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009(1)MPHT33

whereby, the Revisional Court while affirming the order passed by the Appellate Authority under Section 52-A of the Forest Act, 1927, has directed the release of the truck which seized being involved in the forest offence.2. The facts in … when the same was found loading metallic stone (gitti) in Compartment No. P-275 of Forest Compartment Barha Koodi, 40 meter inside State of U.P. Border. Forest offence under POR No. 10784/15 was registered and the said vehicle

Shivnath Vs. A.D.J. (Court No. 4) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Sections 4, 6, 9 and 20; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 122B, 122B(4F), 157 and 158; Transfer of Property Act, 1882; Registration Act, 1908; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules - Rule 138

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC808

for adjudicating the controversy raised in the writ petition are ; notification under Section 4 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 was issued on 26.8.1967 notifying various plots including the plots in question proposed as reserved forest. Notification under … 20.12.1958 was given effect to in the revenue records. No entry came on the record in the last 40 years which was also a factor clearly coming against the petitioner's case. The submission of the petitioner that

Indirabai Narayan Bivalkar, Deceased Through her L.Rs. and Others Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

21 October 1959 entered into with Bivalkar for management of the subject land under the provisions of Indian Forest Act, 1927 and the same was wrongfully and arbitrarily transferred by Forest Department to Revenue Department on its deforestation and … get because of the difference between the quitrent and the full assessment.”..... 40. MaharanaShri Jayavantsinhji, Ranmalsinhji Vs. The State of Bombay and Ors.(AIR 1959 SC … Bombay Personal Inam Abolition Act, 1952 (for short, “the Inam Abolition Act”) came to be enacted. Provisions of Sections 4, 5, 7, 9, 10 and 17 are relevant. In the year 1957, village was surveyed and the