Advanced Search Results
Sri. Nikhil Barua vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Feb-11-2025
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 285 OF IPC, 1860 AND SECTION 25 OF KARNATAKA FIRE FORCE ACT, 1964 AS FAR AS PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A, CONSEQUENTLYQUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.57216/2019 ARISING OUT … in the case of B.S.Suresh and Anr. Vs. The State of Karnataka and Anr., passed in Crl.P.No.12339/2023 dated 29.08.2024, wherein it is held as under: “xxx9. The other submission of the learned Seniorcounsel is with regard to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri. Gajaraju vs State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jan-23-2025
MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 285 OF THE IPC, 1860 AND SECTION 25 OF KARNATAKA FIRE FORCE ACT 1964 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A, CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN -2- C.C.NO.57216/2019 ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.75/2019, FOR THE … in the case of B.S.Suresh and Anr. Vs. The State of Karnataka and Anr., passed in Crl.P.No.12339/2023 dated 29.08.2024, wherein it is held as under: “xxx9. The other submission of the learned Seniorcounsel is with regard to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahesh N S Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Mar-31-2023
Land Acquisition
of Karnataka, (1998) 3 SCC495:8. The Fire Services under the State Government were created and established under the Fire Force Act, 1964 made by the State Legislature. It was in exercise of the power conferred under Section 39 of the … Inspectors [and the qualifications of the authority to which such Inspectors shall be subordinate]. and [specify the - 29 - WP No.10575 of 2021 C/W WP No.17163 of 2021 drugs or classes of drugs of cosmetics or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Harsha N Vs. The Karnataka Public Service Commission
Karnataka
Mar-31-2023
Land Acquisition
of Karnataka, (1998) 3 SCC495:8. The Fire Services under the State Government were created and established under the Fire Force Act, 1964 made by the State Legislature. It was in exercise of the power conferred under Section 39 of the … Inspectors [and the qualifications of the authority to which such Inspectors shall be subordinate]. and [specify the - 29 - WP No.10575 of 2021 C/W WP No.17163 of 2021 drugs or classes of drugs of cosmetics or
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Pappa and ors. Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Chennai
Jul-30-1999
Service
(1999)3MLJ347
rules would not have the effect of displacing or altering the Rules made under Section 39 of the Fire Force Act, 1964 as the Act of the Legislature would have precedence over any Rule made by the Executive under the … Mamspuram. Likewise, petitioners 2 to 7, working in different aided private management schools, were appointed on 4.6.1990, 2.7.1990, 29.6.1990, 9.7.1990 respectively and their appointments were approved by the District Educational Officer. Petitioners 6 and 7 were also
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSheet Metal Workers Vs. Eeoc
US Supreme Court
Jul-02-1986
Land Acquisition
demand employment. Of greater importance, the Commission will only jeopardize its continued existence if it seeks to impose forced racial balance upon employers or labor unions." Id. pt. 2, p. 29. Page 478 U. S. 456 When … of the union guilty of violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating against nonwhite workers in recruitment, selection, training, and … to eradicate the effects of unlawful discrimination and to make the victims of past discrimination whole. Nor can Firefighters v. Stotts, 467 U. S. 561 , be properly read to prohibit a court from ordering any kind … and JUSTICE STEVENS, concluded in Parts IV, V, and VII that: 1. Section 706(g) of Title VII does not prohibit a court from ordering, in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTek Narayan Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Its Secretary
Jharkhand
Jun-29-2017
Education
touching, altering or amending the existing rule framed by the 12 State Government under Section 39 of the Fire Force Act,1964 which prescribed the qualifying examination as a condition precedent for promotion. In this context the Hon'ble Supreme Court … Dumka 28. Sukhdeo Mandal, son of Manohar Mandal, resident of village- Nawadih, P.O.- Nawadih, P.S.- Jama, District- Dumka 29. Ananat Kumar Manjhi, son of Hariwali Manjhi, resident of village- Dhansukhia, P.O.- Pathra, P.S.- Raneshwar, District- Dumka 30.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPushpender and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Sep-23-2005
Land Acquisition
(2006)(91)SLJ238CAT
Ors. v. State of Karnataka and Ors.Article 309 of the Constitution has offended to the Statutory Act i.e.Fire Force Act 1964 in Karnataka and clearly laid down the preposition that once a legislation intervenes to an Act relating to … to collect such fees as may be determined by the Regulations from the applicants who seek registration. 18. Section 29 of the Act empowers the Central Government to make, by notification, rules for carrying out the purposes of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCitizens Forum for Mangalore Development Vs. The State of Karnataka
Karnataka
Dec-13-2016
Land Acquisition
since the respondent-State Government has taken all care and precaution in providing safety measures and not compromising on fire safety and structural stability of the buildings to be regularized. The impugned provisions do not provide for 100% … for submitting applications for regularisation is inadequate and unreasonable. There is considerable force in the contention of the petitioners in writ petition No.18660 of 2007 … 2014; Section 11 321-A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 and Section 187-A of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964, as unconstitutional, illegal and ultravires Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; The further prayer sought
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Gopalakrishnan Minor Vs. Sankara Narayanan and ors.
Chennai
Oct-04-1967
Motor VehiclesCivil
Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 78, 95(1), 110(1), 110-B, 110-E and 110-F - Schedule - Ragulations 6 and 7; Road Traffic Act, 1930 - Sections 45(1); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 29; Occupiers Liability Act, 1957
AIR1968Mad436
the driver of the lorry M/s. T. U. C. S. Limited the owner of the lorry the Co-operative Fire General Insurance Society Ltd., with whom the lorry was insured. R. W. 2, M.K. Subramanian, the driver and … At the time when S. 96 of the Act first came into force there was no claims tribunal Section 96 was introduced in order to … Gopalakrishnan claimed Rs. 3,60,210 as compensation in O. P. No. 60 of 1964 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Madras (hereinafter referred … 6 and 7 of Schedule to Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 Section 45 (1) of Road Traffic Act, 1930, Section 29 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Occupiers Liability Act, 1957 - whether driver of lorry or driver of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »