Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: fire force act 1964 section 29 · Page 1 of about 400 results (0.073 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 31 2023

Mahesh N S Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-31-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Karnataka, (1998) 3 SCC495:8. The Fire Services under the State Government were created and established under the Fire Force Act, 1964 made by the State Legislature. It was in exercise of the power conferred under Section 39 of the … Inspectors [and the qualifications of the authority to which such Inspectors shall be subordinate]. and [specify the - 29 - WP No.10575 of 2021 C/W WP No.17163 of 2021 drugs or classes of drugs of cosmetics or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2023

Harsha N Vs. The Karnataka Public Service Commission

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-31-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Karnataka, (1998) 3 SCC495:8. The Fire Services under the State Government were created and established under the Fire Force Act, 1964 made by the State Legislature. It was in exercise of the power conferred under Section 39 of the … Inspectors [and the qualifications of the authority to which such Inspectors shall be subordinate]. and [specify the - 29 - WP No.10575 of 2021 C/W WP No.17163 of 2021 drugs or classes of drugs of cosmetics or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 1999

S. Pappa and ors. Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-30-1999

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1999)3MLJ347

rules would not have the effect of displacing or altering the Rules made under Section 39 of the Fire Force Act, 1964 as the Act of the Legislature would have precedence over any Rule made by the Executive under the … Mamspuram. Likewise, petitioners 2 to 7, working in different aided private management schools, were appointed on 4.6.1990, 2.7.1990, 29.6.1990, 9.7.1990 respectively and their appointments were approved by the District Educational Officer. Petitioners 6 and 7 were also

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 02 1986

Sheet Metal Workers Vs. Eeoc

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jul-02-1986

Subject : Land Acquisition

demand employment. Of greater importance, the Commission will only jeopardize its continued existence if it seeks to impose forced racial balance upon employers or labor unions." Id. pt. 2, p. 29. Page 478 U. S. 456 When … of the union guilty of violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating against nonwhite workers in recruitment, selection, training, and … to eradicate the effects of unlawful discrimination and to make the victims of past discrimination whole. Nor can Firefighters v. Stotts, 467 U. S. 561 , be properly read to prohibit a court from ordering any kind … and JUSTICE STEVENS, concluded in Parts IV, V, and VII that: 1. Section 706(g) of Title VII does not prohibit a court from ordering, in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 29 2017

Tek Narayan Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Its Secretary

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jun-29-2017

Subject : Education

touching, altering or amending the existing rule framed by the 12 State Government under Section 39 of the Fire Force Act,1964 which prescribed the qualifying examination as a condition precedent for promotion. In this context the Hon'ble Supreme Court … Dumka 28. Sukhdeo Mandal, son of Manohar Mandal, resident of village- Nawadih, P.O.- Nawadih, P.S.- Jama, District- Dumka 29. Ananat Kumar Manjhi, son of Hariwali Manjhi, resident of village- Dhansukhia, P.O.- Pathra, P.S.- Raneshwar, District- Dumka 30.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 2005

Pushpender and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-23-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)(91)SLJ238CAT

Ors. v. State of Karnataka and Ors.Article 309 of the Constitution has offended to the Statutory Act i.e.Fire Force Act 1964 in Karnataka and clearly laid down the preposition that once a legislation intervenes to an Act relating to … to collect such fees as may be determined by the Regulations from the applicants who seek registration. 18. Section 29 of the Act empowers the Central Government to make, by notification, rules for carrying out the purposes of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 1967

K. Gopalakrishnan Minor Vs. Sankara Narayanan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-04-1967

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 78, 95(1), 110(1), 110-B, 110-E and 110-F - Schedule - Ragulations 6 and 7; Road Traffic Act, 1930 - Sections 45(1); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 29; Occupiers Liability Act, 1957

Reported in : AIR1968Mad436

the driver of the lorry M/s. T. U. C. S. Limited the owner of the lorry the Co-operative Fire General Insurance Society Ltd., with whom the lorry was insured. R. W. 2, M.K. Subramanian, the driver and … At the time when S. 96 of the Act first came into force there was no claims tribunal Section 96 was introduced in order to … Gopalakrishnan claimed Rs. 3,60,210 as compensation in O. P. No. 60 of 1964 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Madras (hereinafter referred … 6 and 7 of Schedule to Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 Section 45 (1) of Road Traffic Act, 1930, Section 29 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Occupiers Liability Act, 1957 - whether driver of lorry or driver of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2013

Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr.Stf,cbi Mum ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

withstood rigorous cross examination without being shaken. The deposition of PW-105 corroborates the fact that the training in fire arms was conducted at the hillocks of Sandheri and 10-11 persons participated in the said training. Deposition of … “Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, the provisions of this act shall apply to all cases involving detention, … A.P. State Financial Corpn. (supra), this Court held that right to sell the property by Financial Corporation under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 will be subject to the not obstante clause contained in Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 2016

Citizens Forum for Mangalore Development, Represented by its Joint Co- ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-13-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

since the respondent-State Government has taken all care and precaution in providing safety measures and not compromising on fire safety and structural stability of the buildings to be regularized. The impugned provisions do not provide for 100% … for submitting applications for regularisation is inadequate and unreasonable. There is considerable force in the contention of the petitioners in writ petition No.18660 of 2007 … and certain other laws (Amendment) Act, 2004 Section 76FF Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 Section 321-A Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 Section 187-A Constitutional validity of statute and provisions Petitioners sought to declare 2013 Act, 2009 Act and 2014 Rules … AND OTHERS Vs. M.D. NARAYAN AND OTHERS reported in (2003) 5 SCC 298 has held as under: "30. A perusal of the impugned Act further

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 2016

Citizens Forum for Mangalore Development Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-13-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

since the respondent-State Government has taken all care and precaution in providing safety measures and not compromising on fire safety and structural stability of the buildings to be regularized. The impugned provisions do not provide for 100% … for submitting applications for regularisation is inadequate and unreasonable. There is considerable force in the contention of the petitioners in writ petition No.18660 of 2007 … 2014; Section 11 321-A of the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 and Section 187-A of the Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964, as unconstitutional, illegal and ultravires Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India; The further prayer sought

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial