Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2007 section 70 · Page 1 of about 1,416 results (0.108 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 30 2007

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Mangalam Cement Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : May-30-2007

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)7STR673

Matched in: Citation (2007)7STR673

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2008

Gobind Builders and Developers Vs. Income Tax Settlement Commission an ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-04-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(45), 5, 70, 72, 80AB, 80HHC, 245C, 245C(1), 245C(1B), 245D, 245D(2A) and 245D(2D); Finance Act, 2007; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (2008)216CTR(Bom)75; [2009]309ITR167(Bom)

No. 1, dt. 11th July, 2007 bringing to its notice that in view of the amendment made by Finance Act, 2007 to Section 245D(2D) there was an obligation to pay the additional tax and the interest on or before … referred to in Section 5 computed in the manner laid down in the Act, which obviously includes Sections 70 and 72 also, as held by the Supreme Court in CIT v. Shirke Construction Equipment Ltd. : [2007]291ITR380(SC)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 2016

Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-07-2016

Subject : Service Tax

service tax for the fiRs.time was introduced in India in the year 1994 under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. It has been amended from time to time, inter alia, by introducing more categories of services within … case of State of Punjab-vs.-Bhatinda District Co-op. Milk P Union LTD.reported in 2007 (11) SCC363 In that case, at paragraphs 18 and 19 of the … that by reason of omission or failure on the part of the assessee, to make a return under Section 70 for any prescribed period or to disclose wholly or truly all material facts required for verification of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 13 2019

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-13-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

CJI1 Leave granted. BRIEF BACKGROUND:2. In the present batch of cases, the constitutionality of Part XIV of the Finance Act, 2017 and of the rules framed in consonance has been assailed. While it would be repetitious to reproduce … From Hewart to Leggatt” 28 TRAS51(2009) 6 Excerpts from the ‘Explanatory Notes to the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act, 2007’ prepared by the Ministry of Justice, British Parliament. 10 II. Canada 23. The Tribunal system in Canada, although … Supreme Court shall hold office until the attainment of the age of 70 years. CAT:4. In the case of the Central Administrative Tribunal, we clarify … petitioner had originally approached the High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 13 (5- A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 20 2014

G.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-20-2014

Subject : Service Tax

the provisions of Section 65(90a) read with Section 65(105)(zzzz) of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2007 and Finance Act, 2010 (b) levying or attempting to levy, collect or recover from the petitioner, any service … the date of receipt of a copy of this order, to give reply to the show cause notices. 70 In W.P.No.20580 of 2009, the petitioner has made a challenge to the communication dated 23.06.2009, sent by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2007

Eta Travel Agency Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Apr-20-2007

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)10STJ163CESTAT(Chennai)

Matched in: Citation (2007)10STJ163CESTAT(Chennai)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 29 2007

Hutchison Essar South Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jun-29-2007

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2007)8STR555

Matched in: Citation (2007)8STR555

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2008

Great Lakes Institute of Vs. Cst

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Jan-02-2008

Subject : Service Tax

to a tentative conclusion that GLIM is a "commercial training or coaching centre" for the purpose of the Finance Act, 1994 (''the Act").It appeared to be an establishment providing commercial training or coaching for imparting knowledge or lessons … due process of law, the Commissioner (Service Tax) vide his order in original No. 14/07 dated April 30, 2007, concluded that GLIM imparted commercial training or coaching as defined in section 65(26) of the Act. He found

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2009

M/S.Travel Aid and Others Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Decided on : Oct-09-2009

Subject : Service Tax

interest, and imposing penalties under the provisions of Sections 76, 77 and 78 of Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994. Hence these appeals. 3. I have heard both sides. The finding of the Commissioner (Appeals) on limitation … believe that by reason of omission or failure on the part of assessee to make a return under Section 70 for the period from 01.04.2000 to 30.04.2001 or disclose wholly or truly all material facts required for verification

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 23 2012

Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation Vs. C ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : May-23-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

rely on section 320 of the Finance Act 2004 ("Section 320 FA 2004") or section 107 of the Finance Act 2007 ("Section 107 FA 2007") to exclude DMG mistake claims, as these provisions purported to curtail the extended limitation period … tax unlawfully demanded under the principle established in Woolwich Equitable Building Society v Inland Revenue Comrs [1993] AC 70 ("Woolwich"), and the claim for tax wrongly paid under a mistake which was recognised in Deutsche Morgan Grenfell

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial