Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: finance act 2004 section 2 · Page 1 of about 8,791 results (0.119 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 12 2007

Cyrus Surfactants Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jun-12-2007

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2007)(120)ECC443

duties under the said three Acts and also the Education Cess payable at 2% in respect thereof under Section 93 of the Finance Act, 2004, claimed refunds of the duties and the Education Cess, which was also … the adjudicating authority rejecting the refund claim of the appellants on account of Education Cess levied under the Finance Act, 2004.2. The claim of the appellants for refund of Education Cess was based on the Notification bearing No. 56/2002

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 2006

State of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. Rajasthan Chemists Association

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-24-2006

Subject : Sales TaxConstitution

Acts : Sales of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 3, 4 and 9; Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 2(42), 2(44) and 4A; Finance Act, 2004 - Sections 4A and 4A(1); Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976; Standards of weights and Measures Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 246, 286 and 366(29A); ;Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1982 - Article 366; Constitution of India (46nd Amendment) Act; Drug Price Control Order, 1995; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 2; Contract Act - Sections 77; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28 to 43C, 44AC, 44AC(1) and 206C; Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1989; Finance Act, 1988; Finance Act, 1990 - Sections 44AC; Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 - Sections 2; Madras General Sales T

Reported in : AIR2006SC2699; 2006(202)ELT217(SC); JT2006(6)SC553; RLW2006(4)SC3365; 2006(7)SCALE330; (2006)6SCC773; [2006]147STC542(SC); 2006(2)LC975(SC)

application filed by the respondent-Association was allowed to that extent.2. The controversy arose in the following background:By the Finance Act, 2004 Section 4A was introduced which reads as follows:4A. Levy of tax on retail sale price: (1) Notwithstanding anything contained

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2010

Tata Sky Limited Vs. the State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Decided on : Jul-26-2010

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; ; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 4; ; Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 4A(4), 4B and 4C; ; Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923; ; Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax (Amendment) Act, 2009; ; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 65(5), 65(13), 65(63), 65(72) and 137; ; Prasar Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Section 2; ; Finance Act, 2002 - Sections 65, 66(5), 65(14), 65(15), 65(80) and 65(90); ; Finance Act, 2003 - Section 65, 65(16), 65(95), 65(105) and 66(1); ; Finance Act, 2004; ; Finance Act, 2005 - Section 65(16) and 65(105); ; Government of India Act, 1935; ; Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995; ; Bengal Amusements Tax Act, 1922; ; We

of the gross amount charged by the service provider) under the Finance Act, 2003.19(iv). The provisions of the Finance Act, 2004 on the subject matter of the controversy in hand were identical to the ones incorporated under the Finance … No. 2562 of 2007 and Writ Petition (M/S) No. 353 of 2008, the term 'entertainment' was defined in Section 2(g) of the Entertainment Act, 1979, as under:2. Definitions.- In this Act,-(g) 'entertainment' includes any exhibition, performance, amusement, game,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 08 2006

Sneh Enterprises Vs. Commnr. of Customs, New Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-08-2006

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 3, 3(6), 9A and 9A(8); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 15, 15(1), 15A, 46 and 68; Finance Act, 2004 - Sections 26 and 76

Reported in : 2006(202)ELT7(SC); JT2006(8)SC587; 2006(9)SCALE95; (2006)7SCC714; 2006(2)LC1171(SC)

any other cost, and for profits, as determined under Sub-section (2).Sub-section (8) of Section 9A was introduced by Finance Act, 2004. Prior thereto, the statute did not contemplate application of the provisions of the Customs Act and the rules

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 2011

State of Kerala Vs. M/S. S.D. Pharmacy and Another

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-27-2011

Subject : MRTP

though the first appeal was dismissed, the Tribunal on second appeal held that since the amendment by Kerala Finance Act, 2004 adding the term "brand name" under clause (vi aa) to Section 2 of the Act came into force

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2014

M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-26-2014

Subject : Service Tax

the Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 91 read with section 93 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2004 (23 of 2004)(via)(via) the Secondary and Higher Education Cess on excisable goods leviable under section 136 read with … amount of Rs.2,04,39,093/- under provisions of Rule 14 of the Credit Rules read with Section 73 of the Finance Act,1994. In respect of towers and parts thereof, prefabricated building, printers and office chairs, the Commissioner observed that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 19 2010

Indian Railways Catering and Corporation Ltd Vs Govt of Nct of Delhi a ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-19-2010

Subject : Delhi Value Added Tax

Acts : Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 - Sections 74, 50, 84, 2(zc)(vii) ; Finance Act, 1994 - Section 65(105)(zzt) ; Sale of Goods Act, - Section 4(1), 2(7), 23, 26, 2(m), 29g

the petitioner against the order was dismissed vide order dated 10.12.2008.10. Service tax under Section 65(105)(zzt) of the Finance Act, 1994 is being paid by the petitioner in respect of the transactions in question. The petitioner has been … beverages and the tax was paid up to 30th April, 2007.3. Section 84 of Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004, to the extent it is relevant, provides that if any determinable question arises, otherwise than in proceedings before … food and beverages and the tax was paid up to 30th April, 2007.3. Section 84 of Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004, to the extent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2006

All India Tax Payers Welfare Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-17-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65, 66, 68, 68(1), 70, 71A and 83; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 1B, 9C, 9D, 11, 11BB, 11C, 11D, 12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E, 14, 15, 35F, 35D, 35E, 36, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37O, and 40; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 66, 669(1) and 68; Finance Act, 2004 - Sections 83; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 9C, 9D, 11, 11B, 11BB, 11C, 11D, 12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E, 14, 15, 35F to 35O, 35Q, 36, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 37C, 37D and 40; Service Tax Rules, 1997 - Rules 2, 12 and 17

Reported in : (2006)205CTR(Mad)360; 2006[4]STR14

if he is the person liable for paying the service tax in relation to such service.Section 83 of Finance Act, 2004 : Application of certain provisions of Act 1 of 1944. The provisions of the following sections of the … in Laghu Udyog Bharathi v. Union of India struck down the service tax as amended in 1997 (Rule 2(d)(XII) and (XVII) which are in conflict with Section 65 and 66; that the defects pointed out by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2008

Krishna Lifestyle Technologies Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through t ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-05-2008

Subject : Excise

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 142; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2005 - Sections 13(6) and 35; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002; Finance Act, 2004 - Sections 11; Central Boards of Revenue Act, 1963 - Sections 11D; Customs Act, 1862; Karnataka Land Revenue Act - Sections 158 and 190; Contract Act - Sections 176; Central Sales Tax Act - Sections 9; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 100; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29 and 29(2); Karnataka Sales Tax Act - Sections 15; State Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 25; Income Tax Act - Sections 2(13); Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Se

Reported in : (2008)110BOMLR456; 2008BusLR314(Bom); 2008(125)ECC208; 2008(151)LC208(Bombay); 2008(229)ELT173(Bom); 2009[16]STR669

considered is the power of attachment and sale. The section before the insertion of the proviso by the Finance Act, 2004, only permitted an Officer empowered, to recover any sums payable by attachment and sale of excisable goods belonging … was a default in payment of the dues, Respondent No. 5 issued a public notice on 8th February, 2007, inviting bids for the immovable and movable assets secured in its favour as set out in the public

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 2007

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Godaveri (Mannar) Sahakari Sakhar K ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-08-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 28, 36, 36(1), 43, 43B, 43(2), 139(1) and 145; Provident Funds Act; Finance Act, 2000; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 21 and 43B; Finance Act, 1983; Finance Act, 1987; Finance Act, 1989

Reported in : (2007)109BOMLR2273; (2007)212CTR(Bom)384; [2008]298ITR149(Bom)

the Revenue their learned Counsel submits that the deletion of the second proviso to Section 43B by the Finance Act 2000 with effect from 1st April, 2004 would only mean that Section 43B as it stands in so … the assessee from any of his employees to which the provisions of Sub-clause (x) of Clause (24) of Section 2 apply, if such sum is credited by the assessee to the employee's account in the relevant fund or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial