Advanced Search Results

Neelkanth Devansh Developers Private Limited Vs. Urban Infrastructure ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

the Respondents/original Petitioners has relied upon two judgments of this Court; one in J.K. Corporation Ltd. vs. Ensource Finance Ltd. (2001] 33 SCL 143 (BOM)and the other in Marine Container Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Shaheel Bearings … by Viscount Simon in Charles Osenton and Co. v. Jhanaton [1942 AC 130) ' .the law as to the reversal by a court of appeal … broadly is as under : According to the respondents/original petitioners, the appellant companies were incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 as Private Companies Ltd. by shares on 1st March, 2007, and that the main objects for which … the Apex Court vide Arbitration Application No.12 of 2015 on 09/12/2015 under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking reference to arbitration.

State of Kerala & Another versus Asianet Satellite Communications ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 2215

Bharti (Broadcasting Corporation of India) Act, 1990 - Section 2(c) - Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2001 - Section 65(13). [Para 17.14-17.18] Constitution of India - Seventh Schedule, Lists I, II & III - Fee … SCR 1422 : AIR 1958 SC 468; M/s Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. State of Bihar [1983] 3 SCR 130 : AIR 1983 SC 1019 - relied on. Anjum Kadari v. Union of India, 2024 INSC 831 :

Tanir Bavi Power Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (2005)(101)ECC449

and goods assessed to custom duty, including additional duty of customs, at the time of their clearance.2. Subsequently, Finance Act 2002, under Section 130, granted retrospective exemption in respect of the whole of the additional duty of custom … over Rs. 4 crores. This was on the ground that the power project was commissioned on 8th June 2001 and between the date of commissioning the plant and the grant of refund, the appellant had passed on

Kiran Corporation Vs. the Asstt. C.i.T.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)102TTJ(Ahd.)375

the Income-tax Act and contended that Explanation to Section 36(1)(vii) applied in this case was introduced, by the Finance Act, 2001 with retrospective effect from 1.4.1989. The aforesaid Explanation, was not applicable when the return for the relevant assessment … of Sarangpur Cotton Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. CIT 143 ITR 166, and Vithaldas H. Dhanjibhai, Bardanwala v. CIT 130 ITR 95, as per the law prevalent on the date of filing of return i.e. on 20.12.1990. The

Wallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Ito

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)96ITD1(Mum.)

by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1991 with retrospective effect from 1-4-1972; insertion of section 14-A by the Finance Act, 2001 with retrospective effect from 1-4-1962; Explanation to section 36(1)(viii) by Finance Act, 1992 with retrospective effect from 1-4-1987 … Azadi Bachao Andolan had been applied by the High Courts in 265 ITR 626 (Gau.) and 268 ITR 130 (Ori.). The judgment of Honble Supreme Court had been correctly applied by ITAT, "F Bench Mumbai in the

Wallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Income-tax Officer [Alongwith

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1991 with retrospective effect from 1.4.1972; insertion of Section 14-A by the Finance Act, 2001 with retrospective effect from 1.4.1962; Explanation to Section 36(1)(viii) by Finance Act, 1992 with retrospective effect from 1.4.1987 … Azadi Bachao Andolan had been applied by the High Courts in 265 ITR 626 (Gau.) and 268 ITR 130 (Orr.). The judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court had been correctly applied by ITAT, "F Bench Mumbai in the

Bangalore Turf Club Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

is made clear by Section 74A(3). 7.4. He would contend that the change that was brought about by Finance Act, 2001 was to introduce 32 tax deduction at source on winnings from ‘card game and other game of any … a right of appeal has been conferred by statute. (Halsbury's Laws of England, 3rd Ed., Vol. II, p. 130 and the cases cited there). The fact that the aggrieved party has another and adequate remedy may into

Smt Kusuma Kumari vs the District Registrar

Court : Karnataka

of immovable property exceeding the prescribed value without prior tax clearance, - 10 -was subsequently omitted by the Finance Act, 2001 with effect from 01.06.2001. Prior to its omission, the section mandated production of a certificate from the Assessing … only gives statutory recognition to a transaction. 14.97.2. If the Petitioners dispute the validity of execution, consideration, - 130 -capacity, or title, they must approach the competent civil court. 14.97.3. The writ jurisdiction is not intended to

Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)114TTJ(Asr.)728

the Act, in the light of Section 14A of the Act, which has been brought to statute by Finance Act, 2001 w.e.f. 1st April, 1962 and was applicable to the assessment year under reference. Thus, it was mentioned that

Wimco Seedlings Ltd. Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)293ITR216(Delhi)

of the activity is exempt from taxation however, a new section i.e. Section 14A has been inserted by finance Act, 2001 retrospectively which provides as under: Section 14A : For the purpose of computing the total income under this … develop plants. It was done in such a way that intercropping was possible and the remaining area of 130 acres was put under agriculture.The nursery was not at any fixed place in Chandain farm but was shifted