Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: evidence act 1872 sections 32 1 · Page 1 of about 5,986 results (0.211 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 01 2006

Sham Shankar Kankaria Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-01-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 143, 147, 149, 302, 304, 325 and 342; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 37(1) and 135; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 60

Reported in : JT2006(8)SC533; 2006(II)OLR(SC)708; 2006(8)SCALE760

the High Court.6. At this juncture, it is relevant to take note of Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (in short 'Evidence Act') which deals with cases in which statement of relevant fact by person who is … Appropriate provision-- Sections 34, 143, 147, 149, 302, 304, 325 and 342 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 -- Sections 32 and 60 of Evidence Act, 1872 -- Prosecution has clearly established that the vital blow was given by … under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and of Section 135 of the Bombay Police

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2005

Ranjeet Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-04-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 32(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161 and 313

Reported in : RLW2005(4)Raj2267; 2005(3)WLC719

in 2005 (1) RCR (Criminal) 149 wherein, it has been clearly held that Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is an exception of general rule of exclusion of the hearsay evidence. Section 32 further provides that where … declaration.33. In view of the foregoing discussions therefore, the prosecution has failed to bring home the offences under Sections 302 and 302/34 IPC against appellant Ranjeet Singh. He is given benefit of doubt and acquitted of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2009

Kanti Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-17-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304B and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313 and 482; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32(1) and 113B

Reported in : AIR2009SC2703; 2009(6)SCALE116; (2009)12SCC498; 2009AIRSCW4147

each case for the purpose of admissibility of such statement as dying declaration under Section 32[1] of the Evidence Act, 1872.26. In Kamalakar Nandram Bhavsar v. State of Maharashtra : 2004CriLJ615 , this Court on scrutiny of the evidence … dismissing the appeal of Arvind Kumar [A-1] and Kanti Lal [A-3] and confirming their conviction and sentence under Sections 304B and 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [for short the 'IPC'] recorded by the learned Sessions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 06 2007

Binod Kumar Sharma Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Feb-06-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 32(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 304, 306 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 313

Reported in : 2007(2)BLJR1141; [2007(3)JCR473(Jhr)]

outside the ambit are not strictly within the permissible limits, laid down under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The object of a dying declaration is to get person making the declaration the cause of her death … appellant Binod Kumar Sharma has preferred this appeal, which is directed against the judgment of his conviction under Sections 306 & 498A I.P.C. and order of sentence dated 24.4.1999 passed by 1st Addl. Sessions Judge, Jamshedpur against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2004

Rupsingbhai Tersingbhai Bhedi Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Oct-07-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154 and 374(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 304; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 32(1)

Reported in : (2005)1GLR99

declaration of deceased as deposed, by two above said witnesses.11. Dying declaration under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is an exception to the general rule that hearsay evidence is not admissible evidence, unless evidence is tested … if he is not required to be detained in jail for any other purpose. Criminal - corroboration - Sections 154 and 374 (2) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Sections 34 and 304 of Indian Penal Code, 1860

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2003

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Dnyaneshwar Narayan Pote and Chabubai Nar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-25-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 109, 114, 302, 307 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313 and 428; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 32(1)

Reported in : 2004(1)MhLj121

The law on dying declaration is well settled by now. Clause (1) of Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, statement made by a person, who is dead, as to the cause of his death or as to … Sessions Case No. 67 of 1987 by which the respondents-accused have been acquitted of the offences punishable under Sections 302, 498A read with Section 34 and 498-A, 109 or 114 of the Indian Penal Code (for short,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 2004

Viramji Mohatji Thakore Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-03-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 and 32(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 157, 313 and 374; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 300, 302, 304 and 307

Reported in : (2005)2GLR1622

learned Judge in the impugned judgment. Criminal - commission of offence - Sections 32 and 32 (1) of Evidence Act, 1872, Sections 157, 313 and 374 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Sections 300, 302, 304 and 307 of Indian

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2002

ibrahimkhan Pirkhan Pathan Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-05-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 154 and 162; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32 (1), 145, 155 and 157

Reported in : 2003BomCR(Cri)866; 2003CriLJ1802

with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 154 and 162 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Sections 32 (1), 145, 155 and 157 of Evidence Act, 1872 - appeal against conviction under Section 302 read with Section … the Court, by prosecution, to contradict such witness in the manner provided by Section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872); and when any part of such statement is so used, any part thereof may also

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 2002

Ashok Batra S/O Shri Karam Chand Batra, Mehrauli, New Delhi, Vs. the S ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-14-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302, 304B, 306 and 498A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161 and 173; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 8, 32, 32(1) and 113A

Reported in : 102(2003)DLT642; I(2003)DMC287; 2003(67)DRJ91

the prosecution to establish that the concerned person has committed suicide. Presumption under Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 would also be drawn only when it is shown that she had committed suicide within period of seven … been written by the deceased. The learned counsel contended that under Section 32 of the Evidence Act the same would be relevant.19. Section 498A of … and 29th November, 2000 respectively. The learned trial court held the appellants guilty of the offences punishable under Section 306/34 and 498A/34 Indian Penal Code. Each of the appellant was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three … to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and a fine of Rs. 15,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 306/34 Indian Penal Code. In default

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 1995

Rajendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-24-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 22(1), 32 and 32(1); Rajasthan Police Rules, 1965 - Rule 6.22; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 162, 162(2), 311 and 313; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302, 304B, 307, 326 and 498A

Reported in : 1996CriLJ1560; 1995(3)WLC200; 1995(2)WLN566

law on dying declarations is well settled by now. Under Clause (I) of Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, statement made by a person, who is dead, as to the cause of his death or as to … Rajendra Singh Bhati has filed this appeal against the judgment dated September 16, 1994, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge No. 1, Kota, in Sessions … after obtaining certificate of fitness from the duty doctor.3. The above statement revealed commission of offences punishable under Sections 498A and 307 I.P.C., as such, the same was transmitted to Police Station, Gumanpura for registration of case

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial