Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: energy conservation act 2001 section 23 · Page 1 of about 79 results (0.059 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 19 2007

Spencer'S Retail Ltd. Vs. Maharastra Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Dec-19-2007

Subject : Electricity

not within the jurisdiction of the Commission.Enforcement of DSM measures for energy conservation is subject to regulation under Energy Conservation Act, 2001, by agencies so designated.55. In view of our above findings and observations, we allow the appeal and set … 12% and 8% respectively. MSEDCL, states that, in order to manage and mitigate the shortages, the Commission under Section 23 of the Electricity Act, 2003, has issued series of directions in case Nos. 2, 4 and 5 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2024

M.k. Ranjitsinh Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

is no single or umbrella legislation in India which relates to climate change and the attendant concerns. 15 Energy Conservation Act 2001, Section 14(w). 17 | P age However, this does not mean that the people of India do not have … November 2015. 22 M. Burger and J.Wentz (eds.), Climate Change and Human Rights, UNEP: December 2015, p.11, 19. 23 | P age policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, aligning with the framework principles on human rights and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2003

Sagar Sugars and Allied Products Ltd. Vs. Transmission Corporation of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-15-2003

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1988 - Sections 15(4), 21(4) and 21(5); Constitution of India - Article 226; Power Purchase Agreement - Article 9

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD419; 2004(2)ALT41

factory, the petitioner wanted to establish the power project with bagasse as fuel.3. The petitioner approached the Non-Conventional Energy Development Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Limited (for short hereinafter referred to as 'NEDCAP') with a proposal to set … to produce them separately. Thus by achieving higher efficiency, co-generation facilities can make a significant contribution to energy conservation.3. Objectives of the policy.3.1 As electricity and heat are fundamental inputs to most of the industrial activities the … ORDERD.S.R. Varma, J.1.The petitioner seeks a declaration that the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in abruptly stopping the evacuation of … the power generated by the petitioner and the same is contrary to Section 15(4)(b) of the Reforms Act. Thirdly he contended that the 1st respondent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 05 2024

Neev Energy Llp vs Cochin Smart Mission Limited (Csml)

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-05-2024

WORK TO THIS RESPONDENTExhibit R1(f) TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 27.06.2023 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 14 OF THE ENERGY CONSERVATION ACT 2001 BY THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Exhibit R1(g) TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 30.9.2021 IN WP(C) NO. 18203 … and therefore, that it was impermissible for his client to insist on the tenderers producing such, even on 23.09.2023. He added that, of course, if any tenderer had completed their statutory Audit by them, it was upto

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2025

Converted as Suo-Motu Pil vs Union of India,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-17-2025

Floor, Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 001. 2.The Secretary to Government, Government of India, Department of Atomic Energy, Anushakthi Bhawan, C.S.M.Marg,Mumbai - 400 001. 3.The Secretary to Government, Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests, … that 8th Respondent has the valid mining plans for all its mines. As per Rule 9(2) of Mineral Conservation and Development Rules, 1988 (MCDR, 1988), the Controller General or the authorized officer may require the holder of … M.T. of processed minerals were sold by the 8th Respondent from 2000- 2001 to 2016-2017. The extraction of 60,63,736 M.T of processed minerals from 96,80,600 … and transport to the coastal tracts by streams and rivers, repeated winnowing action by wind and ocean currents and sea level changes, mineral rock formations, … 08.08.2013 to inspect and verify in terms of Section 24 of MMDR Act, 1957, whether there is … Road, Tuticorin - 628 003. Tamil Nadu. 22.S.Vaikundarajan, 23.Thiru.Gagandeep Singh Bedi, I.A.S., Secretary to Government, Revenue Department,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2011

Polyplex Corporation Limited, Uttarakhand and Others Vs. Uttrakhand El ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Jan-31-2011

Subject : MRTP

been widely recognised that rational and economic pricing of electricity can be one of the major tools for energy conservation and sustainable use of ground water resources. In terms of the Section 61 (g) of the Act, the … matter of policy involving public interest as the State Government may give to it in writing. Consequently, under Act, 2001, read with Reform Act, 1999, in the matter of framing of tariff and realisation of charges from the … Greenply Industries Limited respectively as against the common impugned Tariff Order dated 23.10.2009 passed by Uttarakhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission. APPEAL NO.41 OF 2010: 2.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2011

ishwar Chandra Gupta and ors Vs. State of U.P. and ors

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-22-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Section 2, 3, 3A, 3B, 4, 4A, 12, 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 13, 13A, 13B, 16, 19 ; U.P. Societies Registration Rules, 1976 - Rule 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19

water harvesting structures; (i ) minor irrigation canals; (j) non-conventional source of energy; (k) skill upgradation or vocational training centres; (l) roads; and (m) community … entitlement to rehabilitation prior to the 13th day of December, 2005. (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, the Central Government shall provide for diversion of forest land for the following facilities managed by the … of India on March 7, 2001. The following is the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the amendment Act, 2001:- "Prefatory Note- Statement of Objects and Reasons- In the recent past incidence of forest offences has increased considerably. … in 2010 (7) SCC 678, the relevant paragraph 23 of which is reproduced hereunder:- "23.Arbitrariness in the … Prescribed Authority has passed the order in exercise of power provided under Section 61-B(2) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 (as amended vide The Indian

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2012

Ms Saihavahana Ispat Limited. Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-13-2012

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act ; Mineral Concession Rules - Rule 26(1), 54; MINES AND MINERALS (DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATION) ACT - Section 30; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Section 2(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), - Order 14 Rule 2; Constitution of India. - Article 226; Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5; Right To Information Act

respondents No.5 to 11 therein and cause grave injustice to them, since enormous amount of time, money and energy spent by them in setting up the distilleries would be totally wasted.e) Also, in Netai Bag And Others … view of a statutory prohibition with regard to grant of mining lease under the provisions of the Forest. (Conservation) Act, 1980, it was only in the year 2003 that the lands in question were notified for grant of … failed to pursue the revision petition which was pending from 1993 till 2001 but it also did not take part in the proceedings after remand. … any revision petition as it was Rule 54 of the M.C.Rules r/w Section 30 of the M.M.R.D. Act. Further, W.P.No.5303/2006 was filed by one Sri … Others v. Gobardhan Sao And Others.5) (2005) SCC 237 - Divisional Manager. Plantation Division, Andaman & Nicobar

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2020

Wayanad Prakruthi Samrakshana Samithi vs the Union of India

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-18-2020

that "the forest rights shall beconferred free of all encumbrances and procedural requirements, including clearance under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, requirement of paying the 'net present value' and 'compensatory aforestation' for diversion of forest land, except those … stayorder by the Honourable Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 104-105 of 2001, which was ultimately lifted only on 21.07.2009.11. It is submitted that Scheduled … drinking water supply and water pipelines;(h) water or rain water harvesting structures;(i) minor irrigation canals;(j) non-conventional source of energy;(k) skill upgradation or vocational training centres;(l) roads; and(m) community centres: Provided that such diversion of forest land shall … and Climate change prepared rules for notification of critical wildlife habitat under Section 2(b) of the Forest Right Act, 2006 and held several rounds of … that the context in which the meeting on 23.09.2001 was called needs to be elucidated. This was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2025

Jsw Steel Limited vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-24-2025

(Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Mineral Conservation and Development Rules, 2017, Minerals (Other than Atomic and Hydro Carbons EnergyMinerals) Concession Rules, 2016 ('Mineral Concession Rules, 2016' for short), as well as in violation of the judgment of … without considering the petitioner's detailed representations and objections. It is also contrary to the provisions of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, The Mine Act, 1952, Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Mineral Conservation and Development Rules, 2017, Minerals … permit use of the existing road, which had been lawfully created under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and accordingly, the impugned order … as follows:-”The Government of Karnataka (Respondent No.1) vide its letter no.FEE/91/FFM/2012 dated 23.02.2013 had sought prior approval of the Central Government for renewal of mining

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial