Advanced Search Results

C.Ram Prakash and anr. Vs. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. and or ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 38, 40, 164, 14; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 10; Constitution of India - Article 226

transmission licensee in the capacity of Central Transmission Utility as envisaged under Sections 38 and 40 of the Electricity Act, 2003 by the Government of India notification. The respondent No.1 becomes a deemed “transmission licensee” in accordance with Section

P. Balamani and A. Saraswathi Vs. the District Magistrate and District ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 14, 35, 38(1) and 164; Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 16, 16(1) and 16(3); Electricity Supply Act - Sections 45; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12 to 16, 18, 19 and 42; Works of Licensee Rules, 2006 - Rule 3(2); Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rule 233; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 2008(2)CTC555; (2008)4MLJ22

January 2008 as per schedule;d. The Government of India, in exercise of powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 38 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (Act 36 of 2003) had notified it as the Central Transmission Utility vide … directed the District Magistrate to consider the objections and pass orders in accordance with the provisions of the Electricity Act 2003 and the Telegraph Act 1885.(b) The petitioners again filed W.P.Nos.15739 of 2007 and 15740 of 2007 against the

Kamakshi Lamipack Private Limited, Rep.by Its Director Vs. the Governm ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

for considering suspension of cross subsidy surcharge for third party sale as per Section 42 (2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. The said request of TNEB was accepted by the fifth respondent/Commission, observing that for relinquishment of a right … HT SC No.2225, sanctioned by the respondents. The Government of Tamil Nadu, in exercise of its powers under Section 38 of the Electricity Supply Code, vide proceedings dated 22.10.2008, issued directions to the second respondent for imposing restrictions

Tamilnadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, Represented ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

corridor required to get the power transmitted. It is the duty of the Central Transmission Utility (CTU), under Section 38 of the Electricity Act, 2003, to ensure an efficient, economical and integrated transmission system to the utilities. The … that the CERC, in exercise of the powers conferred, under Section 178, read with Section 79(1)(C) of the Electricity Act, 2003, had issued the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Unscheduled Interchange Charges and Related Matters) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2012, hereinafter

In the Matter Of: Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. Gujarat Vs. Gujarat ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

is applicable only to purchase of power to the extent of meeting the minimum specified obligation under the Electricity Act, 2003. 13 In reply to the above contention, the Learned Counsel for 2nd Respondent vehemently submitted that the State … statutory tariff order dated 11th Aug 2006 passed by the State Commission while discharging its statutory function under section 62 and 86 of the Electricity Act 2003. II. The generation tariff determined by the State Commission was … competitive bidding process to be implemented is beneficial to the 2nd Respondent. 38. Shri C K Rai, Learned Counsel for the Respondent countered the arguments

Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Chennai Vs. M ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Subject : Electricity

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Farhan Shaikh vs.state (National Investigation Agency)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

preferring an appeal to the Supreme Court against the order of the Appellate Tribunal for electricity under the Electricity Act, 2003. CRL.A. 871/2018 Page 38 of 49 We may observe that the jurisdiction of the Appellate Tribunal for electricity … of further 44 days in re-filing the appeal. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant under Section 374 and 375 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (The code) read with Section 21 of the National Investigation

Bharat Lal Mittal Vs.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

notice dated 29.04.2003, bill no.92 and report dated 26/27.04.2003 were prepared. Reference to Section 126 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 has been made. I have considered the contentions raised by learned counsel Kumar Parveen 2014.05.22 09:38 I attest

Ramayana Ispat Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : [2025]4S.C.R.436

42. Before delving into the issues before us, the relevant provisions referred to are reproduced below: 42.1. THE ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003 “Section 2. Definitions: - In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires - xxx xxx xxx (15) “consumer” means … payment of the transmission charges and a surcharge under-sub- clause (ii) of clause (d) of subsection (2) of section 38; (k) reduction of surcharge and cross subsidies under second proviso to sub-clause (ii) of clause (d) of sub-section

Poddar Alloys (P) Ltd. Vs. Uttaranchal Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (2007)LCAPTEL86

2004-05.6. On 31^st May, 2004 the UPCL filed Petition No. 2 of 2004 under Section 62(4) of The Electricity Act, 2003 for amendment of the then prevailing Tariff fixed by the Order dated 8^th September, 2003 insofar as it … at 20 per cent and the average administrative expenses, the Commission has not only loaded T&D losses at 38.17 per cent and 34.17 per cent for the given period but has also suddenly and abnormally increased levy