Advanced Search Results

Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Court passed the following Order: 1. When the petition was filed Appellate Tribunal under Section 110 of the Electricity Act 2003 was not constituted. A tribunal has since been constituted under Section 110 of the Act. A notification has

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Vs. Maharas ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

versus MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS. .…Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal, under Section 125 of the Electricity Act 2003, is against a judgment and order dated 27th April 2021 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, hereinafter

Empee Distilleries Limited Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

the same as being violative of the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or Sale of Electricity Act, 2003 and the exemption Notifications in G.O.Ms.No.25 dated 24.3.2008, G.O.Ms.No.106 dated 04.09.2008, G.O.Ms.No.79 dated 14.09.2009, G.O.Ms.No.43 dated 30.4.2010 and … Aranthangi, Pudukottai Dt. - 614 606. Whereas - You being a person liable to pay tax under sub section (1) of Section 3 have not submitted the return(s) under section 8 of the Act in respect of

The Tata Power Company Limited Transmission Vs. Maharashtra Electricit ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

2003. The tariff for intra-State Transmission System can be decided under Section 62 or Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 63 provides for adoption of the tariff determined through transparent process of bidding. Clause 5.3 of the Tariff

In the Matter Of: North Delhi Power Ltd and Others Vs. Delhi Electrici ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

the proceedings before the State Commission. The State Commission while exercising the power under section 86 of the Electricity Act, 2003 cannot issue directions to the Government for reimbursing the additional cost for power purchase. The course of action … DTL (R-2) for the FY 2005-06 for actual power purchase cost and the RLDC/ULDC charges aggregating to Rs. 118.05 crores, allowing the DTL (R-2) to recover the same from the Distribution companies/Appellants in the ratio of energy

Gmr Warora Energy Limited Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commissio ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Court, in the case of MSEDCL v. APML & Ors. (supra), after considering the statutory provisions in the Electricity Act, 2003, held that the CERC, SERCs and the learned APTEL are bodies consisting of experts in the field.129. This … law is then set out by Article 13.3 of the PPA.” 59 118. It could thus be seen that this Court has held that insofar … 30th December 2011; (iv) Increase in levy of Minimum Alternate Tax (“MAT” for short) pursuant to amendment of Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 2012; 12 (v) Design changes in Coal Handling Plant in terms of

Kaithakuzhy Educational Association vs Kerala State Electricity Board,

Court : Kerala

time barred in view of Regulation 136 of the Electricity Supply Code, 2014 or Section 56 of the Electricity Act, 2003 is not sustainable as the period for which demand was raised is prior to promulgation of the Kerala … Kerala State Electricity Boardand another v. Principal, Sir Syed Institute for Technical Studies and others [(2021) 14 SCC 118] and as such, the learned Single Judge ought to have interfered with Ext.P1 demand notices and also Exts.P2

Kaithakuzhy Educational Association, vs Kerala State Electricity Board ...

Court : Kerala

time barred in view of Regulation 136 of the Electricity Supply Code, 2014 or Section 56 of the Electricity Act, 2003 is not sustainable as the period for which demand was raised is prior to promulgation of the Kerala … Kerala State Electricity Boardand another v. Principal, Sir Syed Institute for Technical Studies and others [(2021) 14 SCC 118] and as such, the learned Single Judge ought to have interfered with Ext.P1 demand notice and also Exts.P2

Binani Zinc Limited, Rep. by Vs. Kerala State Electricity Board,

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL868

Rs. 1 crore with the KSEB.14. Before the Supreme Court it was argued by the Appellant that the Electricity Act, 2003 having come into force with effect from 10^th June, 2003, the KSERC functioning as such before this date … dated 11^th October, 2002.4. Thereafter, on 24^th October, 2002, the KSEB in exercise of the power conferred by Section 49, 59 and Sub-section (i) of Section 79 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 and other enabling provisions … where the Commission has observed that the extent of cross-subsidy ranges between 118 per cent to 159 per cent as per the figures furnished by

Power Grid Corporation of India Vs. Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam

Court : Central Electricity Regulatory Commission CERC

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Central Electricity Regulatory Commission CERC