Advanced Search Results

Tarini Infrastructure Limited Vs. Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. Though ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

M/S. Abraham Memorial Educational Trust and Others Vs. C. Suresh Babu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

Goa Coaching Classes (Regulation) Act, 2001; Section 17(2)(a) of The Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or Sale of Electricity Act, 2003; Section 23(2)(a) of The Tamil Nadu Groundwater (Development and Management) Act, 2003; Section 10(1)(a) of The Tamil Nadu … or the State Government, as the case may be, he shall not be liable for prosecution under this Chapter. (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where any offence under this Act has been committed by a

B.T.Kokila Vs. the Chairman, Tamilnadu Electricity and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code - Regulation 23(AA); Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 135; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21

the cases on hand, barring one or two, are cases in which proceedings under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, have been initiated. 3. In some cases, the petitioners have come up with writ petitions, immediately after provisional … out of final assessment orders slapped by the Electricity Board under Regulation 23(AA) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code. Since the issues raised in … appellate and revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 156, in a manner similar to those prescribed by Chapters 29 and 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 21. An interesting facet of Sections 154 to 156

Hotel Adityaz Limited Vs. Madhya Pradesh Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Co. Ltd ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

impermissible. It is further submitted that the action of the respondents runs contrary to Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for brevity, the 'Act') and clause 9.1.1 of the Code. Shri Katare submits that along with the return, … be made at twice rate, while the units will be arrived at 1.5 times. Reliance is placed on Chapter 10 of the Code and Sections 155 and 154 of the Act. The allegations of malafide are specifically … inside the main gate of hotel premises on a structure of about 23 ft. height. The installation was in such a manner that 33 KV

Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Others Vs. Union ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

vs. GNCTD and Ors.Policy Directions dated 12.06.2015 issued by the Department of Power, GNCTD under Section 108 of Electricity Act, 2003 without placing before the Lieutenant Governor for his views/concurrence.8.W.P.(C) No.348/2016Ramakant Kumar vs. GNCTDNotification dated 22.12.2015 issued by the … the Union Territories for the purposes of their administration, we shall in brief refer to the provisions of Chapter I of Part V of the Constitution that deals with the Executive of Union. 44. In order to … each writ petition. Sl.No.Writ PetitionPartiesImpugned order/action1.W.P.(C) No.5888/2015GNCTD vs. UOINotifications dated 21.05.2015 and 23.07.2014 issued by the Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs empowering the

Empee Distilleries Limited Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

the same as being violative of the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or Sale of Electricity Act, 2003 and the exemption Notifications in G.O.Ms.No.25 dated 24.3.2008, G.O.Ms.No.106 dated 04.09.2008, G.O.Ms.No.79 dated 14.09.2009, G.O.Ms.No.43 dated 30.4.2010 and … KW/12500/KVA11KV has been registered with the department on 19.02.2008 and re-registered on 23.02.2011. As per the Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption of Electricity Act, 2003, … regard to a contract or an act done by his agent. In Friedman's Law of Agency (Fifth Edition) chapter 5 at p. 73, the/principle of ratification has been explained: ".What the 'agent' does on behalf of the

In the Matter of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Li ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

charges and losses) Regulations,2010 (ISTS Regulations), after following the due process as contemplated under Section 178(3) of the Electricity Act, 2003. 5. As per the ISTS Regulations dated 15.6.2010, the 2nd Respondent National Load Despatch Centre (NLDC) was designated … Act and that therefore, the Appeal is maintainable. 22. Tariff of the inter-State transmission system is fixed under Chapters 3 and 4 of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations 2009 ( “Tariff … there is no determination of tariff as is sought to be contended. 23. As indicated above, the exercise of the power while passing this impugned

State of Gujarat Vs. Utility Users Welfare Association Through Its Pre ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

T.C.(C) No.139/2015 T.C.(C) No.138/2015 T.C.(C) No.137/2015 T.C.(C) No.140/2015 C.A. No.3759-3760/2016 T.P.(C) No.974/2016 JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. The Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘said Page 1 of 84 Act’) provides for Central and State Regulatory Commissions. … Government to constitute a State Transport Authority and Regional Transport Authorities to exercise powers and functions specified in Chapter V. Section 68(2) put a restriction that no person who has a financial interest whether as proprietor, employee … Procedure, 1973, insofar as it may be applicable.” Page 21 of 84 23. The conclusion in favour of an Appropriate Commission being headed by a

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; Section 56, Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006; Section 154, Electricity Act, 2003; Section 27 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997; Section 61 of the Competition Act, 2002. … was of the firm opinion that the tribunals should be a real substitute to High Courts. While scrutinizing Chapter II of the Act which dealt with the establishment of tribunals, this Court expressed its view that a … King said that “he thought the law was founded on reason, and 23 | Pa ge that he and others had reason, as well as

Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. and anr. Vs. Sai Renew ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 61,82(1),86 (1)(a)(b),111(1),125,185,39,172(b),185(3); DevelopersElectricity Reform Act, 1998 - of Section 21 (4)(B); Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 - Section 3,15,17,22; Reform Act, 1998 - Section 11,15(5),21,21(4),11(1)(c)&(e)

th July, 2004. Aggrieved from both these orders the Developers filed independent appeals under Section 111(1) of the Electricity Act, 2003 collectively against the order dated 20th March, 2004 as modified by order dated 7th July, 2004. These appeals … into force of the Electricity Act, 2003, Regulatory Commission issued notice on 23rd October, 2003 inviting objections from various Developers and Generators to the proposals … is the function of the Regulatory Commission and the State Govt. has a minimum role in that regard. Chapter VII of this Act deals with tariff. In terms of Section 26(2), the Regulatory Commission, in addition to