Advanced Search Results

Anand Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

40(1)(a)(aa) is concerned, learned Advocate General and learned Senior Advocate invited my attention to section 165 of the Electricity Act, 2003 and the amendment to section 40 made by virtue of this provision, to say that the meaning of … pointed out by Shri Vivek Rusia that respondents in the return have stated that action is taken under Chapter VII of the Land Acquisition Act, but the procedure contemplated under Chapter VII has not been followed. Accordingly, … that the Collector received the report and thereafter the Additional Collector on 19.11.2010 vide Annexure P/6, directed the Deputy Director of Agriculture to also submit

Siyalal Kachi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

40(1)(a)(aa) is concerned, learned Advocate General and learned Senior Advocate invited my attention to section 165 of the Electricity Act, 2003 and the amendment to section 40 made by virtue of this provision, to say that the meaning of … pointed out by Shri Vivek Rusia that respondents in the return have stated that action is taken under Chapter VII of the Land Acquisition Act, but the procedure contemplated under Chapter VII has not been followed. Accordingly, … that the Collector received the report and thereafter the Additional Collector on 19.11.2010 vide Annexure P/6, directed the Deputy Director of Agriculture to also submit

Paliwal Alloys (Pvt.) Limited Vs. U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC3746

an appeal and to deposit an amount of Rs. 10,00,000 along with the appeal as provided under the Electricity Act, 2003 within a period of three weeks and the appellate authority was directed to decide the appeal within a … is in fact second writ petition, which deserves to be dismissed as in accordance with the provisions of Chapter XXII, Rule 7 of the Rules of the Court second application on the same facts is barred. Before … for committing contempt of the Court be not drawn against him. On 19.11.2008, the Managing Director appeared before the Court. The Division Bench on the

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

been found impossible for the appellant, a generating company within the meaning of Section 2 (28) of the Electricity Act,2003 to reach the benchmarks or the yardstick fixed by the Commission in its said Regulations, 2009, by virtue … provisions of the Tariff Regulations,2009 in respect of which amendment is sought for. The Regulations,2009 consists of five chapters covering 59 regulations of which we quote some of them as could be seen hereunder for better appreciation … K.S Venkataraman and Co. Pvt.Ltd. V/s State of Madras reported in AIR 1966 SC 1089 ,(c ) PTC India Ltd. Vs CERC reported in (

Empee Distilleries Limited Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

the same as being violative of the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Tax on Consumption or Sale of Electricity Act, 2003 and the exemption Notifications in G.O.Ms.No.25 dated 24.3.2008, G.O.Ms.No.106 dated 04.09.2008, G.O.Ms.No.79 dated 14.09.2009, G.O.Ms.No.43 dated 30.4.2010 and … regard to a contract or an act done by his agent. In Friedman's Law of Agency (Fifth Edition) chapter 5 at p. 73, the/principle of ratification has been explained: ".What the 'agent' does on behalf of the … was inspected on 17.02.2008 under Rule 63(3) of the Indian Electricity Rules 1956. Earlier, the Unit has been permitted by the Chief Electrical Inspector to

Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Vs. Delhi Transco Limited Through Its

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Hotel Adityaz Limited Vs. Madhya Pradesh Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Co. Ltd ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

impermissible. It is further submitted that the action of the respondents runs contrary to Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for brevity, the 'Act') and clause 9.1.1 of the Code. Shri Katare submits that along with the return, … be made at twice rate, while the units will be arrived at 1.5 times. Reliance is placed on Chapter 10 of the Code and Sections 155 and 154 of the Act. The allegations of malafide are specifically … petitioner Hotel Adityas Ltd., is a registered company under the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner obtained high tension connection of 300 KV through service connection.

Kovvuri Trinadha Reddy Late Sri Subba Reddy, Hindu Vs. Eastern Power D ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 30, 61, 126, 126(3), 126(4), 126(5), 127, 127(6), 135, 135(1), 135(2), 135(4), 135 to 139, 147, 153, 153(1), 154, 154(5), 181, 183, 183(1), 185, 185(1) and 185(3); Electricity (Supply) Act 1948 - Sections 2(7), 2(17), 2(24), 2(39), 2(57), 2(58), 2(64), 2(70), 2(73), 5(1), 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 30, 42, 43, 45(1), 45(4), 47(1), 45, 48, 49, 49(4), 50, 53, 56, 56(1), 61, 62, 62(1), 62(3), 82(1), 82(2) and 86; Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2(58); Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998 - Sections 49, 56 and 57; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission Electricity Supply Code (first amendment) Regulations, 2005 - Regulations 5, 7A, 39, 39.2, 39.3 and 39.5; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2007(6)ALD752

Act, 1948, which stood repealed by the Electricity Act, 2003, which came into force with effect from 10.6.2003. Chapter XII of the new Act deals with the investigation and enforcement. Section 126 provides for the process for … Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., declared as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003. When the matter came up for admission on 17.3.2006 the learned Single Judge, while examining the question, whether … v. Eastern Power Distribution Co. of A.P. Ltd. Judgement in W.A. No. 194 of 2004 dated 9.7.2004, and Mallikarjuna Polishing Industries v. Chief Managing Director,

M/s. G.D. Oil and Floor Mill Vs. Madhya Pradesh Madhya Kshetra Vidyut ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : MRTP

theft. 17. It is profitable to mention here that in Electricity Act 2003, Section 126 finds place in Chapter - Part XII with the heading "Investigation and Enforcement", whereas Section 135 is in Part XIV under the … Court has considered the distinction between the cases which fall under Section 126 and Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (in short '2003 Act'). This Court in no uncertain terms opined that in cases where allegation of electricity … kept in abeyance. In support of his submission, reliance is placed on 1970 LJL 34 (Kale Khan Vs. Board of Revenue, M.P. and others). Lastly,

Kovvuri Trinadha Reddy and ors. Vs. Eastern Power Distribution Corpora ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 13, 50, 56, 56(1), 56(3), 57, 61, 126, 126(2), 126(3), 126(4), 126(5), 127, 127(6), 135 to 139, 147, 153, 153(1), 154, 154(5), 181, 183, 183(1), 185, 185(1) and 185(3); Electricity (Supply) Act 1948 - Sections 2(7), 2(17), 2(24), 2(39), 2(57), 2(58), 2(64), 2(70), 2(73), 5(1), 12, 14, 15, 16, 30, 42, 43, 45(1), 45(4), 45(5), 47(1), 48, 49, 49(4), 53, 56(1), 61, 62, 62(1), 62(3), 82(1), 82(2) and 86; Indian Electricity Act, 1910; A.P. Electricity Reforms Act, 1998; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Electricity (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2005; Constitution of India - Article 14; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission Electricity Supply Code (first amendment) Regulations, 2005; Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(4)ALT580

Act. 1948. which stood repeated by the Electricity Act, 2003, which came into force with effect from 10-5-2003. Chapter XII of the new Act deals with the investigation and enforcement. Section 126 provides tor the process for … Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., declared as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003. When the matter came up for admission on 17-3-2006 the learned Single Judge, while examining the question, whether … v. Eastern Power Distribution Co. of A.P. Ltd. Judgment in W.A. No. 194 of 2004, dt.9-7-2004 and Mallikarjuna Polishing Industries v. Chief Managing Director, Transmission