Advanced Search Results

Scooters India Ltd. Vs. Java Hind Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 25; Patent Rules, 1972 - Rule 35

Reported in : AIR1988Delhi82; 1988(1)ARBLR255(Delhi); 33(1987)DLT298

Bhushan in support of the petition and Mr. N.K. Anand in opposition thereto. (4) The Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911 contained provisions both relating to Patents as well as to Designs. With the enactment of the Patents Act, … 27, section 28, section 51, section 54, section 57, section 60, section 61, section 63, sub-section (3) of section 69, section 78, section 84, section 86, section 88(3), section 89, section 93, section 96 and section 97. (3)

N.P. Amrutesh and Another Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 51A and 226; Emblems and Names (Prevnetion of Improper Use) Act, 1950 - Sections 3; Prevention of Insults to National Honours Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 - Article 129; Indian Trade Marks Act, 1940; Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 4, 5, 6 and 9,; Indian Merchandise Marks Act, 1889; Indian Companies Act, 1913; High Couort Judges (Service Conditions) Act, 1986; National Flag Code - Sections 7, X

Reported in : AIR1995Kant290; 1996(6)KarLJ464

offend the sentiments of the people. The provisions of the Indian Trade Marks Act 1940, Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911, Indian Merchandise Marks Act, 1889, and the Indian Companies Act, 1913, are not adequate to prevent these abuses. … 'The Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, i.e., Act No. 69 of 1971'. The two Acts have been enacted with an object to … responsibility towards public at large and to come forward to espouse the cause of many persons of weaker section who could not come to Court to agitate their rights enshrined under Art. 25 of the Constitution of

The Registrar of Trade Marks and anr. Vs. Kumar Ranjan Sen and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1), 2(2), 4(2), 21(5), 23(1), 56 and 56(4)

Reported in : AIR1966Cal311

of this Act and the Controller of Patents and Designs for the purposes of the Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911. 2. The Central Government may appoint such other officers with such designations as it thinks fit for the … considered in this case. A copy of the authorisation appears at pages 69 to 70 of the paper book. Section 5 deals with the establishment … should not be treated as not admissible as having been filed beyond time and as such barred under Section 21(1) of the said Act read with Rule 51 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Rules 1959. On

Dart Industries Inc. and anr. Vs. Techno Plast and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 4, 11, 18, 19, 20, 22, 22(2)(3), 22(3) and 29; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14, 15, 17, 45, 51, 53 and 55; Designs Rules, 2001; Designs Act, 1911; Patent Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2007(35)PTC285(Del)

provides as under:1. Copyright shall not subsist under this Act in any design which is registered under the Designs Act, 1911(2 of 1911).2. Copyright in any design, which is capable of being registered under the Designs Act, 1911 (2 … are two plaintiffs in this case who have filed this suit for permanent injunction against the defendants under Section 22 of the Designs Act, 2000 read with Section 55 of the Copyright Act, 1957. The plaintiff No. … Anderson printed and bound by William Clowes Ltd., England on page No. 69 (Upper Photo with the written 'Beef turnovers'). This clearly shows that these

Microforms Inc Vs. Girdhar and Co. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13(1), 14, 15, 15(2), 40, 48 and 51; ;Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2 and 2(5); Designs Act, 1911; ;Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2 and 2(1); ;Patents Act; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 479; ;Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 15

Reported in : 128(2006)DLT238; 2006(32)PTC157(Del)

registration of designs in India under the provisions of the said Act or the predecessor Act being the Designs Act, 1911 (hereinafter referred to as the Designs Act, 1911) The plaintiff having failed to complete the requisite formalities under … The plaintiff has claimed that the artistic work constitutes original artistic work as defined within the meaning of Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act. The plaintiff also claims that it enjoys copyright protection in India as a … of learned Single Judge of this Court in I.A. Nos. 6597 and 6944 of 1991 in Suit No. 1481 of 1991 titled 'S.S. Sarna Inc.

Music Broadcast Private Limited Vs. Indian Performing Right Society

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property

reads as follows: "15. Special provision regarding copyright in designs registered or capable of being registered under the Designs Act, 1911. - (1) Copyright shall not subsist under this Act in any design which is registered under the Designs … definition of cinematograph film prior to the amendment included the sound track, 69 S2401.06 if any. I do not see how this position could possibly … operate and maintain FM radio stations at various places in India. The defendant, a Copyright Society constituted under section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957 administers the rights of lyricists and composers and issues licences to perform

Pravinbhai Jagjivandas Mehta Vs. Officine Lovato S.P.A.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 51A and 53; Designs (Amendment) Act, 2000 - Sections 22; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4

Reported in : 2002(25)PTC161(Guj)

discuss various authorities cited at the Bar regarding interpretation of provisions of Sections 51A and 53 of the Designs Act, 1911 as the controversy in question is governed by the provisions of the Designs Act, 2000, (new Act or … Mehta in five suits filed by him against defendant No. 1 Officine Lovato S.P.A. (the first defendant) under Section 22 of the Designs Act, 2000 (the Act). Since in all the five suits the parties are the … from 1995 onwards, which are as under:- Year Euro INR1995 12,896 5,41,6321996 69,547 29,20,9741997 2,22,214 93,32,9881998 10,90,320 4,57,93,4401999 27,14,190 11,39,95,9802000 23,54,144 9,88,74,0482001 13,10,264 5,50,31,088 11.4.

All India Reporter Ltd. Vs. Nagpur Improvement Trust

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1983)85BOMLR321

right of appeal against an award made by the Tribunal constituted under the provisions of the Calcutta Improvement Act, 1911, which is a local Act. It will be of some interest to note that the provisions of this … commercial and public utility plots and open spaces. It comes to nearly 69% of the total area covered by the scheme. The first para of … act under Section 31 of the N.I.T. Act while it approved of framing the impugned scheme which it designated as 'Bhamti Parsodi Street Scheme.' The penultimate para of this resolution states the extent of the land which

Madura Coats Limited and ors. Vs. Chetan Dev

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act - Sections 120; Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 36

Reported in : AIR1985P& H43

that effect. In the above said case, the suit was brought under s. 36 of the Patents and Designs Act, 1911, which, before its repeal by the Patents Act, 1970 (Act 39 of 1970) was, in substance, the same … Upendra Nath Dass and Sons v. T. C. Martin, AIR 1962 Cal 69 it was held that in order to succeed in an action for … heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the relevant evidence on the record.5. Section 120 of the Act reads:-'120 (1) Where a person by means of circulars, advertisements or otherwise, threatens person

Micolube India Limited Vs. Rakesh Kumar Trading as Saurabh Industries ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

view which was taken by the learned single judge of this court under the old Act which is Designs Act, 1911 when the powers to hear cancellation as well as the suit used to vested in the High Court … CONSEQUENTIAL EFFECT UPON CHANGE IN POLICIES IN LAWS FROM TIME TO TIME 69 It is noteworthy to mention that although the provisions of Designs Act … whether the registration is prima facie evidence of validity. The question under reference rather invites the construction of Section 22 of the Design Act, 2000 so as to discern whether it permits a suit for infringement of