Advanced Search Results

Shakti Yezdani Vs. Jayanand Jayant Salgaonkar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

MFs/shares were made as per Section 109A & 109B of Companies Act, 1956 and bye-law 9.11.7 of the Depositories Act, 1996. Section 109A and 109B of the Companies Act, 1956 must be read as a code in themselves, wherein … of S. 109A of Companies Act and Bye-law 9.11 framed under the Depositories Act, 1996. The bench accordingly ruled that an incorrect view was taken in Kokate (supra).13. The object of S. 109A(3) of the Companies Act,

Anis Ur Rehman vs.mohd. Tahir and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

(b) the securities held by a- (i) depository as registered owner under sub-section(1) of section 10 of the Depositories Act, 1996 (ii) participant as an agent of a depository. Explanation.-The expressions ―depository‖ and ―Participants shall have the meanings respectively … dated 08.05.2018 by which the trial court has rejected the plaint filed by the appellant/plaintiff under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on account of the suit filed by the plaintiff being barred under The Benami Transactions (Prohibition)

Smt. Asha JaIn and anr. Vs. Sh. Anil Kumar JaIn A+

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 2(1), 3, 3(3), 4(1), 4(2) and 4(3); ;Depositories Act, 1996 - Section 10(1); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 12, Rule 6; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

daughter;(b) the securities held by a(i) depository as registered owner under Sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Depositories Act, 1996(ii) participant as an agent of a depository.(3) Whoever enters into any benami transaction shall be punishable with … pointing to the averments in the reply to I.A. No. 11139/2009 filed by the plaintiffs (Under Order 12 Rule 6) to say that the consideration for the 50% share was paid in cash. Para 3 of the … partition. The suit alleges about some incident said to have occurred on 08.02.2009 which has triggered the present action. The plaintiffs claim mesne profits, valuing

Smt. Anita Gupta vs.sh. Suresh Dudani & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

partner, director of a company, a depository or a participant as an agent of a depository under the Depositories Act, 1996 and any other person as may be notified by the Central Government for this purpose; (iii) any person … HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA No.1347/2019 1. This application is filed under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC seeking a decree in favour of the plaintiff.2. Learned counsel for defendant No.2 has filed his

V.J.Deenadayalan vs Jayamani

Court : Chennai

partner, director of a company, a depository or a participant as an agent of a depository under the Depositories Act, 1996 (22 of 1996) and any other person as may be notified by the Central Government for this purpose;(iii) … AS No.267 of 2013 (MKKSJ & VSGJ) Prayer in AS No.267/2013: This appeal is filed under Order 41 Rule 1 read with Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the decree and judgment … Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the decree and judgment dated 08.03.2013 passed in OS No.13 of 2007 on the file of the Court

Raman Jain vs.magan Mala Jain & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

partner, director of a company, a depository or a participant as an agent of a depository under the Depositories Act, 1996(22 of 1996) and any other person as may be notified by the Central Government for this purpose; … common to be clearly pleaded and hotchpotch have mentioned and which requirement legal requirement because of Order VI Rule 4 CPC which provides that all necessary factual details of the cause of action must be clearly stated.

Messer Holdings Ltd. Vs. Shyam Madanmohan Ruia and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

of shares in companies by virtue of amendments in the Companies Act, 1956 and the advent of the Depositories Act, 1996 etc. We make this observation because the 75001 shares acquired by MGG pursuant to AGREEMENT-II could not be … GGL filed two applications seeking certain interim orders. I.A. No.7248 of 1998 in the SUIT-I invoking Order 39 Rule 1&2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”) and OMP No.205 of 1998 … to the orders of the Bombay High Court dated 22.02.2000, 04.10.2002 and 08.06.2011. The prayer in SUIT-II after such Amendments; “Rider-I(a) (a) (i) For a

Balram Garg Vs. Securities And Exchange Board Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992), the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 25 1956 (42 of 1956), the Depositories Act, 1996 (22 of 1996) or the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013) and rules and regulations made thereunder shall … on Balram Garg or consulted Balram Garg in any decision related to trading in securities. Presumption is a rule of evidence which cannot be drawn unless and until such foundational facts are proved. ii. That no material

Sebi Vs. Shri R.M. Meyappan

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Direct Taxation

of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act or the rules made there under; (d) contravenes the provisions of the Depositories Act, 1996 or the rules made there under; (e) contravenes the rules, regulations or bye laws of the stock exchange, … broker has ceased to be a member of MSE w.e.f. 21.08.2001. 3.1.2 In this regard, I note that Rule 4 of the SEBI (Stock brokers and sub brokers) Rules, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as "the broker regulations")

Brd Securities Ltd. vs the Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : Kerala

that the respondent administers the provisions of the Act, 1992, the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 and the Depositories Act, 1996. In terms of Section 24(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, SEBI administers the provisions of Chapter III, Chapter … 444/2021 :5: rendered by the respondent, due to which the possibility of an impartial adjudication has to be ruled out .4. During the course of arguments, the learned Senior Counselappearing for the appellant also submitted that no … CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY MONDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 17TH PHALGUNA, 1942 WA.No.444 OF 2021 AGAINST