Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: customs act 1962 section 99 · Page 1 of about 1,503 results (0.088 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 04 2009

Essar Steel Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-04-2009

Subject : Customs

Acts : Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 99 and 114; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 7, 12, 22, 25, 28(1), 30 and 76A to 76N; Sea Customs Act; Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 - Sections 1, 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(4), 5, 7, 12, 15(9), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 30, 51, 53, 53(1), 53(2) and 55; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 38 and 38(1); Taxation Act - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4A; Trade Marks Act - Sections 28; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4 and 4(1); Factories Act, 1948; Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Land Customs Act; Indian Aircrafts Act, 1911; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(15), 2(18), 2(19), 2(20), 2(22), 2(23), 2(25), 2(26), 2(27), 12, 14, 14(1), 17, 18, 46 and 50; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Income

Reported in : [2010]24STT121

21 of the SEZ Rules, 2006, it was also clarified that the provisions of Section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962 were inapplicable for the purpose of levying export duty for the aforesaid movement of goods, as such movement … Special Economic Zone were enacted by Act 20 of 2002 effective from 11-5-2002 and have been omitted vide Section 99 of the Finance Act, 2007 with effect from 11-5-2007. Section 76B as was operative during the above mentioned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 30 2005

Rasilaben H. Rathod Vs. Commr. of Cus. (Prev.)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-30-2005

Subject : Customs

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2003

Gaur Impex Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : Dec-16-2003

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (2004)(94)ECC45

imported under Bills of Entry Nos. 31993, 31994, 31995 and 31996 dated 20.11.2001 under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962.However he has given an option to the importer-appellant to redeem the same on payment of fine of Rs.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 23 1999

iron Master (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-23-1999

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111 and 125(2)

Reported in : 81(1999)DLT866; 1999(51)DRJ254; 2000(67)ECC376; 2000LC60(Delhi); 1999(114)ELT792(Del)

imposed in respect of the imported goods. The goods imported had been confiscated under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, but an option to pay redemption fine and--penalty in lieu of confiscation, had been provided to the petitioner

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 2009

Commissioner of Customs (Sea) Vs. Customs Excise and Service Tax Appel ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-24-2009

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11, 25(1), 28(1), 108, 110, 111 and 112; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167(8); Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3 and 4G; Customs Rules

Reported in : 2009(165)LC169(Madras); 2009(240)ELT166(Mad)

the Advance Licence r/w customs Notification No. 48/99 is not an offence committed under Section 11(o) of the Customs Act, 1962 and whether goods are not liable for confiscation.2. Whether the second respondent is not lilable to pay penalty

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 2003

Maral Overseas Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : May-30-2003

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2003)(161)ELT935TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2004

Supreme Woollen Mills Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Cus.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-04-2004

Subject : Customs

Reported in : (2004)(95)ECC654

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 2003

Gujarat Methodist Church Cardiothoracic and Vascular Vs. Union of Indi ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-16-2003

Subject : Customs

Acts : Bombay Public Trust Act; Societies Registration Act; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25, 28(1) and 111; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3

Reported in : (2004)1GLR270

show cause why the customs duty of Rs. 66,26,949/should not be demanded and confirmed under Section 28(1)of the Customs Act, 1962, and the equipment in question not be confiscated under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, on the ground

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 2001

M/S. Sri Kannapiran Mills Ltd. Vs. C.C.E. Coimbatore

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on : May-15-2001

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2001)LC72Tri(Chennai)

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2006

Nanya Imports and Exports Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Che ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-10-2006

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25(1); Customs Tariff Act, 1976 - Sections 3; Customs Tariff Act, 1975

Reported in : 2006(197)ELT154(SC); 2006(4)SCALE274; (2006)4SCC765

the expression 'insoles, midsoles and sheets thereof' used in the exemption Notification No.20 of 1999 issued under the Customs Act, 1962 (for short 'the Act') can be interpreted to mean that the sheets rolled up for the convenience of … Customs Act, 1962 (Customs Tariff) as well as the additional duty of customs (or countervailing duty) leviable under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1976. Subsequently, the assessee made three applications for the refund of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial