Advanced Search Results
Essar Steel Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Gujarat
Nov-04-2009
Customs
Finance Act, 2007 - Sections 99 and 114; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 7, 12, 22, 25, 28(1), 30 and 76A to 76N; Sea Customs Act; Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 - Sections 1, 2, 2(1), 3, 3(1), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 4(4), 5, 7, 12, 15(9), 26, 26(1), 26(2), 30, 51, 53, 53(1), 53(2) and 55; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 38 and 38(1); Taxation Act - Sections 3, 3(1) and 4A; Trade Marks Act - Sections 28; Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4 and 4(1); Factories Act, 1948; Sea Customs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Land Customs Act; Indian Aircrafts Act, 1911; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 2(15), 2(18), 2(19), 2(20), 2(22), 2(23), 2(25), 2(26), 2(27), 12, 14, 14(1), 17, 18, 46 and 50; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951; Income
[2010]24STT121
21 of the SEZ Rules, 2006, it was also clarified that the provisions of Section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962 were inapplicable for the purpose of levying export duty for the aforesaid movement of goods, as such movement … Special Economic Zone were enacted by Act 20 of 2002 effective from 11-5-2002 and have been omitted vide Section 99 of the Finance Act, 2007 with effect from 11-5-2007. Section 76B as was operative during the above mentioned
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRasilaben H. Rathod Vs. Commr. of Cus. (Prev.)
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Sep-30-2005
Customs
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGaur Impex Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Dec-16-2003
Customs
(2004)(94)ECC45
imported under Bills of Entry Nos. 31993, 31994, 31995 and 31996 dated 20.11.2001 under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962.However he has given an option to the importer-appellant to redeem the same on payment of fine of Rs.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
iron Master (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Jul-23-1999
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111 and 125(2)
81(1999)DLT866; 1999(51)DRJ254; 2000(67)ECC376; 2000LC60(Delhi); 1999(114)ELT792(Del)
imposed in respect of the imported goods. The goods imported had been confiscated under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, but an option to pay redemption fine and--penalty in lieu of confiscation, had been provided to the petitioner
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs (Sea) Vs. Customs Excise and Service Tax Appel ...
Chennai
Apr-24-2009
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 11, 25(1), 28(1), 108, 110, 111 and 112; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 167(8); Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3 and 4G; Customs Rules
2009(165)LC169(Madras); 2009(240)ELT166(Mad)
the Advance Licence r/w customs Notification No. 48/99 is not an offence committed under Section 11(o) of the Customs Act, 1962 and whether goods are not liable for confiscation.2. Whether the second respondent is not lilable to pay penalty
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaral Overseas Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
May-30-2003
Service Tax
(2003)(161)ELT935TriDel
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSupreme Woollen Mills Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Cus.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Mar-04-2004
Customs
(2004)(95)ECC654
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGujarat Methodist Church Cardiothoracic and Vascular Vs. Union of Indi ...
Gujarat
Jul-16-2003
Customs
Bombay Public Trust Act; Societies Registration Act; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25, 28(1) and 111; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3
(2004)1GLR270
show cause why the customs duty of Rs. 66,26,949/should not be demanded and confirmed under Section 28(1)of the Customs Act, 1962, and the equipment in question not be confiscated under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, on the ground
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Sri Kannapiran Mills Ltd. Vs. C.C.E. Coimbatore
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
May-15-2001
Land Acquisition
(2001)LC72Tri(Chennai)
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNanya Imports and Exports Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Che ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-10-2006
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25(1); Customs Tariff Act, 1976 - Sections 3; Customs Tariff Act, 1975
2006(197)ELT154(SC); 2006(4)SCALE274; (2006)4SCC765
the expression 'insoles, midsoles and sheets thereof' used in the exemption Notification No.20 of 1999 issued under the Customs Act, 1962 (for short 'the Act') can be interpreted to mean that the sheets rolled up for the convenience of … Customs Act, 1962 (Customs Tariff) as well as the additional duty of customs (or countervailing duty) leviable under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1976. Subsequently, the assessee made three applications for the refund of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »