Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: customs act 1962 section 63 · Page 1 of about 1,571 results (0.101 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 04 1994

TIn Manufacturing Co. of India Vs. Central Warehousing Corpn.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-04-1994

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(43), 2(44), 15, 17, 49, 57, 58, 59, 59A, 60, 63, 69, 72(2), 111, 111(1), 112, 125 and 129A(1); Constitution of India - Article 226 - Sections 219; Import Control Regulations

Reported in : 1995(78)ELT129(All)

in view of the pendency of the dispute and bonding to be taken under Section 49 of the Customs Act, 1962 (Annexure 6 to the petition). But the Collector Customs ordered on 29-12-1987 that the goods be confiscated under … a bonded warehouse and provisions of Chapter IX of the Act do not apply to such warehoused goods. Section 63 of the Customs Act provides for levy of the warehousing charges on the owner of the goods when

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 1997

Sun Export Corporation and anr. Vs. Board of Trustees of the Port of B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-23-1997

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111 and 125; Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 3(2); Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 63; Bombay Port Trust Act, - Sections 3(5)

Reported in : AIR1997SC4044; 1997(96)ELT3(SC); JT1997(8)SC530; 1997(6)SCALE553; (1998)1SCC142; [1997]Supp4SCR682; 1997(2)LC786(SC)

28-2-1976 found that the goods covered by the consignment were liable to confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962 for various reasons detailed in the order. Option to redeem the goods was, therefore, given to the appellant … goods confiscated by the Customs authority were not available to the Port Trust for appropriation towards their dues. Section 63 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, in the facts and circumstances of this case, does not come

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 01 2016

N. Ponnappan Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Customs Tuticorin Customs ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Jul-01-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

7719 of 2016 are also dismissed. Constitution of India, 1950 Article 14, Article 19, Article 21, Article 226 Customs Act, 1962 Section 2(1), Section 30(3), Section 63, Section 148, Section 149,Section 157 Indian Penal Code Section 120 B, Section 409,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 04 2000

Anil Mahajan Vs. Commissioner of Customs and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-04-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 132 and 135(1)

Reported in : 2000IIIAD(Delhi)369; 2000CriLJ2094; 84(2000)DLT854; 2000(53)DRJ501; 2000(69)ECC758; 2000LC36(Delhi)

to the petitioner who is alleged to have committed offences punishable under Sections 132 and 135(1)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The offence under Section 132 of the Act is bailable and the … the provisions for sentence and penalty, provisions have been made under Section 111 of the Customs Act and Section 63 of FERA for confiscation of the goods/currency/security/money/property in respect of which the offence was committed. 14. The legal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1989

Sewing Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-20-1989

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 49, 59, 59(1), 63(2), 72(1), 126(2) and 142(1); Central Excise Act

Reported in : 1989(20)ECC47; 1989(44)ELT456(Kar); ILR1990KAR1441; 1989(1)KarLJ462

the petitioner applied for bonding of the goods in the Warehouse in accordance with Section 59 of the Customs Act 1962 ('the Act' for short) in order to avert payment of demurrage. After lengthy correspondence, the petitioner was orally … the petitioner was notified that in default, action would be taken against the petitioner in accordance with Sections 63(2) and 72(1)(B) of the Act. The nest result was that the petitioner was denied the clearance of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2006

Amarnath Vyas Vs. State of A.P.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-19-2006

Subject : Intellectual Property RightsCriminal

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 53A, 63 and 70; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167, 167(2) and 438; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 386

Reported in : 2007CriLJ2025

v. Union of India 2005 Cri LJ 2801. That judgment came to be rendered under the provisions of Customs Act, 1962. The punishment prescribed under Section 135(1)(ii) of the Customs Act is imprisonment for a term, which may extend … of 1974) (for short 'the C.P.C.) having regard to the accusation that he perpetrated the offence punishable under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (Act No. 14 of 1957) (for short 'the Act'), this Court dismissed the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2006

Lt. Governor, Nct and ors. Vs. Ved Prakash @ Vedu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-05-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Sections 45, 47, 48, 50 and 59; Delhi Public Gambling Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 4 and 12; Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25, 26, 27, 28 and 29; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 135; Punjab Excise Act, 1955 - Sections 61, 63 and 66; Opium Act, 1878; Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Bombay Prevention of Begging Act, 1959 - Sections 11, 107 and 108; Bombay Police Act - Sections 56; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 290, 308, 323, 427, 458, 498A to 498E, 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 70 to 89, 119 to 124, 445, 446, 447 and 448; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : JT2006(5)SC425; 2006(5)SCALE250; (2006)5SCC228; 2006(1)LC739(SC)

28 or Section 29 of the Arms Act, 1959; or(e) of any offence under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962; or(f) of any offence under Section 61, Section 63 or Section 66 of the Punjab Excise Act, 1955,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 2020

Chairman, Board of Trustees, c.p.t. Vs. M/S Arebee Star Maritime agen. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-05-2020

Subject : Education

Rai, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the Appellant Port Trust, referred to various provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 and the MPT Act, and argued that once responsibility for the goods is taken over by the Port … to be sold in the public auction, realising the funds, to be apportioned in the manner specified under Section 63, cannot but be deprecated. This Court holds that the respondent Port Trust can demand ‘Ground Rent’ only to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1984

Shanmukha Vilas Cashew Traders Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-26-1984

Subject : CustomsFERA

Reported in : 1985(6)ECC185; 1985LC603(Kerala)

for alleged violation of Section 18(1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act read with Section 113(d) of the Customs Act, 1962. The petitioner by Ext. P10 showed cause immediately and also appeared at the hearing afforded by the respondent. … there was some variation regarding the mode of performance. In such circumstances, I am of the view that Section 63 of the Contract Act squarely applies. Section 63 reads:-- 63. Every promisee may dispense with or remit, wholly

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 14 1989

Kesoram Rayon Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jun-14-1989

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1991)LC222Tri(Delhi)

the warehouse. The appellants did not apply for extension of the warehousing period under Section 61(l)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962. The warehousing period of three months was not, therefore, extended. The appellants paid a sum of Rs. 8,03,458.32 … 8-5-1985. In the said reply the appellants contended that on 17-3-1985 the Central Govt. issued a Notification No. 63/85-Cus. exempting, inter-alia, "pulp" derived by mechanical or chemical means from any fibrous vegetable material and falling under Heading

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial