Advanced Search Results

Eurofinance Sa and Others Vs. RubIn and Others

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

Canada. 58. By about 2005 TCT's business ceased after the Attorney General of Missouri brought proceedings under Missouri's consumer protection legislation which resulted in a settlement involving a payment by the trustees of US$1,650,000 and US$200,000 in costs. … Mr Irving Picard ("the trustee"), the trustee for the liquidation in the United States under the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 ("SIPA") of Bernard L Madoff Investment Securities LLC ("Madoff"), which was Bernard Madoff's broking company. The … Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/1030) ("CBIR")), which applies generally, or the assistance provisions of section 426 of the Insolvency Act 1986, which applies to a limited number of countries, including Australia. 2. In Rubin a judgment of the US … Inc [1993] BCLC 112 an English injunction against a Texas corporation in Chapter 11 proceedings was discharged; cf In re African Farms Ltd [1906] TS … 38. Cambridge Gas owned directly or indirectly about 70% of the shares of Navigator Holdings plc ("Navigator"),

M/s Newtech Promoters And Developers Pvt Ltd. Vs. The State Of Uttar P ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

for enforced accountability towards builders and developers in the absence of an effective mechanism in place. Though, The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 5 was available to cater the demand of home buyers in the real estate sector but the experience … is beneficial not only to the home buyers but to the promoters and real estate agents as well.15. Chapter II of the Act relates to the registration of real estate projects. Section 3 mandates prior registration of … very question was raised by the appellant before the High Court in 70 extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The High

Kishore Lal Vs. Chairman, Employees State Insurance Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 38, 39, 40, 40(2), 46, 46(1), 55A, 56, 59, 68, 70, 74, 75, 75(1), 75(2), 75(3) and 95; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1); Employees' Provident Fund Act - Sections 5; Employees' State Insurance (Central) Rules, 1950 - Rules 56, 57, 58, 60 and 61

Reported in : AIR2007SC1819; 2007(4)ALD36(SC); 2007(3)AWC3082(SC); 2007(2)BLJR1653; 2007BusLRSN-2(SC); (2007)2CompLJ385(SC); I(2008)CPJ13(SC); 2007(3)CTC561; [2007(114)FLR219]; [2007(3)J; 2007LawHerald(SC)1696

the appellant's wife was a direct result of the wrong diagnosis. The appellant filed a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as 'the CP Act') before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum seeking (i) compensation towards … to recover the contribution made for the employee by deducting the same from the wages of the employee. Chapter V of the ESI Act deals with benefits. Sub-section (1) of Section 46 falling within this Chapter contemplates … (Omitted);(d) claim against a principal employer under Section 68;(e) claim under Section 70 for the recovery of the value or amount of the benefits received

Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

with cases filed by allottees before them, until the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission finally decided that the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was an additional remedy and continued to be an additional remedy to the remedies provided under RERA. They … is concerned only with 24 transactions in which finance is involved. He also pointed out, with reference to Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Proceedings in the United States, that once a company has been stigmatised as being bankrupt or … referred to and relied upon Section 4(2)(l)(D) of RERA to show that 70% of advances received by the developer from allottees must be put into

Royal Nepal Airlines Corporation Vs. Shrishti Properties Pvt Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act - Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25-B; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 29 Rule 1 read with Order 3 Rule 1

with the provisions of Section 86 of the Code and it applicability to a complaint filed under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986; in this context the Apex Court had noted that the provisions of Section 86 are excluded and are … the District Forum shall be deemed to be a civil court for the purposes of section 195, and Chapter XXVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974)."10. The powers of Controller under the DRCA

Sudha Anand Vs. Chief Administrator and Others

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

Subject : Education

Matched in: Court Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

Karnataka Pradesh Hotel & Restaurants Association vs Union of Indi ...

Court : Karnataka

more apt competition laws and increasing the quantum of compensation available to consumers within the purview of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.We respectfully and humbly submit that the situation at the grass root level necessitates a reanalysis of the … STANDARDS AUTHORITY OF INDIA FRAMED UNDER SECTION 92 OF ACT, 34 OF 2006 NAMELY, THE REGULATIONS 1.2.4 IN CHAPTER I, 2.1 IN CHAPTER II, 5.1 IN PART II OF SCHEDULE IV, 7 IN PART II OF SCHEDULE … 30% of the Hospitality Industry consist of star rated hotels. The rest 70% of the industry comprises of small scale and medium scale industry players.

Ashok Gangadhar Maratha Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Motor VehiclesInsurance

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 14 and 66; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 3, 75(2), 77, 78 and 79; Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 - Rules 3 and 16

Reported in : II(1999)ACC463; 2000ACJ319; AIR1999SC3181; (1999)4CompLJ125(SC); JT1999(6)SC423; (2000)1MLJ105(SC); (1999)123PLR523; 1999(5)SCALE346; (1999)6SCC620; [1999]Supp2SCR202; 1999

(for short, the 'State Commission'). Both the National Commission and the State Commission have been constituted under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. By judgment dated December 30, 1993 the State Commission had allowed the complaint of the appellant and had … 2 of the Act as under:driving licence' (Clause 10) means the licence issued by a competent authority under Chapter II authorising the person specified therein to drive, otherwise than as a learner, a motor vehicle or a

Vimal Oraganics Ltd. Through Its Director Arun Kumar Agarwal Vs. State ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Environment

Reported in : 2008(2)AWC1164

justify, the reply filed by other side after the period for filing reply prescribed under Section 13(2) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has expired, shall not necessarily be rejected only for the reason that it has been filed after time … Limitation Act could be treated to be within time by giving benefit of the period under Rule 2, Chapter III of the Rules of the Court. This Court held that once limitation prescribed under the Limitation Act … Recovery Act.' (para 10).When the right to file a suit under Section 70(3) is expressly preserved, there is a necessary implication that the shield of

Cellular Operators Association of India and Ors. Vs. Telecom Regulator ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

or a Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission or the National Consumer Redressal Commission established under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986); (C) the dispute between telegraph authority and any other person referred to in sub-section (1) … the network of the service provider;”; (bc) “calling consumer” means a consumer who initiates a voice call;”; After Chapter IV of the principal regulations, the following chapter shall be inserted, namely :- |“CHAPTER V” | | | … Chinese Government has unlimited funds to pour into its telecom companies, over 70% of their share capital being held by the Government. Spectrum allocation to