Advanced Search Results

Manish Kumar Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Regulation and Development Bill was introduced in the Rajya Sabha in 2013. Noticing the fact that though the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is available as a Forum in the real estate market for the buyers, the recourse is only curative … following persons shall not be entitled to make an application to initiate corporate insolvency resolution process under this Chapter, namely: - (a) a corporate debtor undergoing a corporate insolvency resolution process; or (b) a corporate debtor having … received the assent of the President of India on the 25.03.2016. By 01.05.2017, 102 the provisions of the Act came into force, even though, certain

Ajabrao Mahadeorao Choudhary Vs. the Principal, Kala Vanijya Mahavidya ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Sections 59(1); Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Administrative Act, 1985; Payment of Gratuity Act; Bombay Prohibition Act; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code; Bombay Stamp Act; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Indian Railways Act; Motor Vehicles Act; Small Causes (Enhancement of Pecuniary Jurisdiction and Amendment) Act, 1986; Abolition of Letters Patent Appeals Act, 1986 - Sections 3; Bombay High Court, Appellate Side Rules, 1960 - Rules 1, 2, 4, 17, 18 and 18(3); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226, 227 and 228

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR33; 2008(6)MhLj436

the University and College Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, DART, the State of Maharashtra Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as well as the decision rendered by the Tribunal under the Administrative Act, 1985 should be challenged before … the order passed by the University and College Tribunal is covered by Clause (40) of Rule 18 of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules and amenable to the jurisdiction of the learned Single … College Tribunal, Nagpur.2. In writ petition No. 812/2007 by an order dated 01-02/04/2007, the learned Single Judge has passed the order, which is reproduced as

Cpl Ashish Kumar Chauhan (retd.) Vs. Commanding Officer

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

various letters26 admitted that the appellant qualifies as a consumer under Section 2 (l) (d) (ii) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, (hereafter “CPA1986) as the appellant, being a permanent employee of the IAF, availed medical services from the respondents … it, or a copy of it; hence, he could not have produced the same.22. Reference was made to Chapter 16 of “The Guidelines for HIV Testing, March 2007”, published by the National AIDS Control Organisation, Ministry of … same.12. Meanwhile, proceedings of the Court of Inquiry (CoI) were held on 01.07.2018 to investigate circumstances under which the appellant was transfused blood at the

Hotel and Restaurant Assocn. and anr. Vs. Star India Pvt. Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and Communication

Acts : Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 - Sections 2, 4A and 4A(9); Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Sections 2(1), 2(2), 11, 11(1), 11(2), 14, 18 and 36; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1) and 9; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; Indian Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933; Copyright Act; Sales Tax Act; Indian Tariff Act, 1934; Imports and Exports Control Act, 1947; Cotton Textiles Cess Act, 1948; Cotton Textiles Companies (Management of Undertakings and Liquidation or Reconstruction) Act, 1967; The Register of Interconnect Agreements (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Regulations, 2004

Reported in : AIR2007SC1168; (2007)1CompLJ46(SC); 2006(12)SCALE543; 2007[5]STR161

using cable television cannot be treated as subscribers. (iv) In view of the definition of 'consumer' contained in Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short 'the 1986 Act'), the users for commercial purposes having been excluded, members of Appellants - Associations … and associated signal generation, control and distribution equipment, designed to provide cable service for reception by multiple subscribers;3. Chapter II of the 1995 Act provides for cable television network to be operated only upon registration thereof. Section

Mylan Laboratories Limited vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

taken from the Consumer Protection (Amendment) Bill, 2001 which brought in a change to the scheme of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by adding Sub-Section (1B) to Section 16 and Sub-Section (1A) to 20, which empowers the President of the … of Copyright is lying vacant till date. V. Plant Varieties Protection Appellate Tribunal 1. As per provisions of Chapter VI Section 54(II) PPV&FR Act, 2001, the Plant Varieties Protection Appellate Tribunal having judicial powers to dispose of … a bench of the IPAB shall sit.3. By Gazette Notification S.O.1049(E) dated 01/10/2003, the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 100,

Rateesh Sharma and Others Vs. the Chandigarh Sector 21 Universal Housi ...

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

Resources of Aviation Redressal Association Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Airports

Acts : Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India Act, 2008 - Section 13; Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 - Sections 22A, 28K; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 6; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Section 5(1); Consumer Protection Act,1986 - Section 9; Indian Companies Act, 1913 - Section 202

or a Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission or the National Consumer Redressal Commission established under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act,1986; (iii) which are within the purview of the Competition Act, 2002; (iv) relating to an order of … issue, whether an appeal would lie to the Appellate Tribunal. Section 17 of the Act, which occurs in chapter IV deals with Appellate Tribunal and provides that Central Government by notification in the Official Gazette can establish … the amendment of Section 22A by the 2008 Act with effect from 01.01.2009, the rate of development fees to be levied and collected at the

South Delhi Municipal Corporation Through Its Commissioner Citi Civic ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Sudha Anand Vs. Chief Administrator and Others

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

Subject : Education

Matched in: Court Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh

Vimal Oraganics Ltd. Through Its Director Arun Kumar Agarwal Vs. State ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Environment

Reported in : 2008(2)AWC1164

justify, the reply filed by other side after the period for filing reply prescribed under Section 13(2) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has expired, shall not necessarily be rejected only for the reason that it has been filed after time … Limitation Act could be treated to be within time by giving benefit of the period under Rule 2, Chapter III of the Rules of the Court. This Court held that once limitation prescribed under the Limitation Act … of the facts as noted above the first assessment order is dated 01.03.1994. Rest of the ten orders have been made between 16.05.2000 and 19.12.2005.