Advanced Search Results

interglobe Aviation Limited Vs the Secretary Competition Commission of ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade

Acts : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - sections 11(1), 33(1)(d),66 ; Competition Act, 2002 (`CA'). - sections 26(1),66(1), 66(3), 66(4), 66(5)

has also been alleged), before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission shall, on the commencement of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009, stand transferred to the Appellate Tribunal and shall be adjudicated by the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with the … writ petitions challenge an order dated 16th June 2010 passed by the Competition Commission of India (`CCI') under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (`CA').2. The background to the present petitions is that by an order … the alleged practice was a restrictive trade practice as defined under Section 33(1)(d) and 33(1)(j) of the MRTP Act. Consequently in exercise of its powers

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

31st March, 2003. The Competition Act has been subsequently amended by the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 and the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009. 114. The Preamble of the Competition Act reads as under:- "An Act to provide, keeping in view of … aspect regarding grant or exercise of any right pertaining to a patent except to ensure the compliance with Section 3 and 4 of the Competition Act. He referred to the decision of this Court in the Union of

Vicnivaas Agency Vs. Mmtc Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

has also been alleged), before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission shall, [on the commencement of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009]., stand transferred to the Appellate Tribunal and shall be adjudicated by the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with the … for MMTC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.The petitioners before this Court filed separate applications under Section 12B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the „MRTP Act‟), seeking … trade practices referred to in clause (x) of sub-section (1) of section 36A of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (54 of 1969)

Cross Land Marketing (2000) Pte. Ltd. Vs. the Food Corporation of Indi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

has also been alleged), before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission shall, [on the commencement of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009]., stand transferred to the Appellate Tribunal and shall be adjudicated by the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with the … for MMTC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.The petitioners before this Court filed separate applications under Section 12B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the „MRTP Act‟), seeking … trade practices referred to in clause (x) of sub-section (1) of section 36A of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (54 of 1969)

G.K. Granites Vs. Tata Hitachi Construction Machinery Company Limite

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

has also been alleged), before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission shall, [on the commencement of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009]., stand transferred to the Appellate Tribunal and shall be adjudicated by the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with the … for MMTC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.The petitioners before this Court filed separate applications under Section 12B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the „MRTP Act‟), seeking … trade practices referred to in clause (x) of sub-section (1) of section 36A of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (54 of 1969)

Apoorva Agencies Vs. Food Corporation of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

has also been alleged), before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission shall, [on the commencement of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009]., stand transferred to the Appellate Tribunal and shall be adjudicated by the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with the … for MMTC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.The petitioners before this Court filed separate applications under Section 12B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the „MRTP Act‟), seeking … trade practices referred to in clause (x) of sub-section (1) of section 36A of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (54 of 1969)

Vicnivaas Agency Vs. Food Corporation of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

has also been alleged), before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission shall, [on the commencement of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009]., stand transferred to the Appellate Tribunal and shall be adjudicated by the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with the … for MMTC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.The petitioners before this Court filed separate applications under Section 12B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the „MRTP Act‟), seeking … trade practices referred to in clause (x) of sub-section (1) of section 36A of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (54 of 1969)

Niravkumar Dilipbhai Makwana Vs. Gujrat Public Service Commission and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

belonging to any categories mentioned in sub­section (1) gets selected on the basis of merit in an open competition with general candidates, he shall not be adjusted against the vacancies reserved for such category under sub­section (1)." … statutory provisions i.e. Recruitment Rules of 1967, Rules of 2007, 2008 and 2009, we hold that all those candidates belonging to a reserved category, if … in Jitendra Kumar Singh (supra). In this case, this Court was considering the interpretation of Sub­section (6) of Section 3 of U.P. Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 (for short"199.

Namrata Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Competition Commission of India and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

issued and promulgated. On 19th February, 2009 the Ordinance was replaced by the Uttar Pradesh Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) (Amendment) Act, 2009 (U.P. Act No. 3 of 2009). Therefore, said Writ Petition No. 47934 of 2008 was amended challenging the … the impugned order/notice dated 28th May, 2013 issued by the Director General, Competition Commission of India, New Delhi under Section 41 (2) read with Section … new sections, being Sections 3-A, 3-B, 3- C, 3-D and 3-E, were inserted in the Acquisition Act, 1971. Section 3-A of the Acquisition Act provides that the State Government may, in the public interest, divest, sell off, transfer

Nandu Ahuja and Others Vs. Competition Commission of India and Another

Court : Competition Appellate Tribunal

Subject : MRTP

an issue that a notice could not be issued to the respondents under the provisions prior to the amendment of the Competition Act, which came only on 20th May, 2009. Similarly, FTPGI also filed its reply, on … parties who were engaged in the business of cinema production and / or distribution had been guilty under Section 3(3) of the Competition Act, 2002 (in short the "Act") in as much as they had engaged themselves in