Advanced Search Results

Ankur Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP/Competition Laws

Acts : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 4, 4(1), 11, 12A, 12B, 12B(1), 12B(3), 12B(4), 36C and 36D; ;Companies Act, 1956; ;Consumer Protection Act, 1986; ;Contract Act; ;Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 41; ;Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002; ;NPA Act; ;Clayton Act, 1914 - Section 4; ;Competition Act, 2002; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 9 - Order 1, Rule 8; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission Regulations, 1991 - Regulation 77

Reported in : 2010CompLR43,[2010]100SCL1(Delhi)

dated 13.11.2000 and direct the Commission (now the succeeding authority being Competition Commission of India under the The Competition Act, 2002) to proceed in accordance with law.52. The petition is accordingly allowed leaving the parties to bear their own … set up any bar, either express or implied, to the institution of the present suit. The provisions of Section 9 CPC are clear and the decision of this Court in the case of Citicorp and Anr. (supra) is

Competition Success Review Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 9; Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867; Indian Post Office Rules, 1933 - Rule 30

Reported in : 2003VIIIAD(Delhi)442; 106(2003)DLT469; 2003(70)DRJ690

clearly accounted for in the overall pagination of the said Special January 2002 issue of the publication entitled 'Competition Success Review' (English monthly). Notes (i) … publication--'Competition Success Review' -- under the Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867. The petitioner's said publication i.e.. Competition Success Review (English monthly) is also registered with the Department of Posts, Office of the Chief Post Master … and continues to be applicable for the period under consideration. The renewal is done under the provisions of Section 9 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 read with Rule 30 of the Indian Post Office Rules, 1933

Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

are as under:Bull Machines Pvt. Ltd. (respondent No.2 herein) filed information before CCI under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the said Act by JCB India Ltd. (respondent No.1

Competition Commission of India Vs. Jcb India Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

are as under:Bull Machines Pvt. Ltd. (respondent No.2 herein) filed information before CCI under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 alleging contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the said Act by JCB India Ltd. (respondent No.1

Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce, Bangalore Vs. Kannada Grahakara Ko ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : MRTP

The 8th Respondent By Holding That There Is A Prima Faice Case Against The Petitioner For Violating The Competition Act, 2002.) 1. The subject matter of challenge in this petition is a direction dated 18.10.2012 issued under S.26(1) of … that the respondent Nos.1 and 2 having approached the respondent No.8 - the Competition Commission of India, under Section 19(1) of the Act, to institute an enquiry against the petitioner and the respondent Nos.3 to 7, by … be ordered to be discarded and action taken against respondent Nos.8 and 9 for the disobedience. 6. Sri Krishna S.Dixit, learned Assistant Solicitor General of

Competition Commission of India vs.m/s. Grasim Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

of the CCI, stating that GIL had abused its dominant position, in terms of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 („Act‟). 1.3 The learned Single Judge has, in the impugned judgment, held that inasmuch as the direction issued … Director General in terms of the relevant provisions of the Act and the Regulations made thereunder.” DG’s Report 9. The DG submitted a report dated 26th February, 2013 in which, apart from the three issues framed for

Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India Vs. Delhi Internationa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

in proceedings initiated suo moto by it since it is a dominus litus in such proceedings;49 47 The Competition Act 2002; Section 53S; Also see the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations 2009; Regulation 51 48 (2010) 10 SCC744[104]. 49 … Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum or a Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission or the National Consumer Redressal Commission established under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986); (iii) Which are within the purview of the Competition

Brahm Dutt Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP Constitution

Acts : Competition Act, 2000; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 1(3), 7, 8, 8(2), 9 and 63(2); Competition Commission of India (Selection of Chairperson and Other Members of the Commission) Rules, 2003 - Rules 3 and 4(3)

Reported in : AIR2005SC730; (2005)3CompLJ358(SC); [2005(2)JCR59(SC)]; JT2005(1)SC421; (2005)2SCC431; [2005]57SCL429(SC); (2005)1UPLBEC895

P.K. Balasubramanyan, J.1. The Competition Act, 2002 received assent of the President of India on 13.1.2003 and was published in the Gazette of India dated … make prescription for the appointment of a Chairman and the members as composing the Commission in terms of Section 9 of the Act. 2. In exercise of the Rule making power under Section 63(2)(a) read with Section 9

M.k. Rajagopalan Vs. Dr. Periasamy Palani Gounder

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … to an Application under Section 7 filed by a Financial Creditor as compared to the one filed under Section 9 by an Operational Creditor, in relation to a Section 7 Application where there is an existence of a

Resources of Aviation Redressal Association Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Airports

Acts : Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India Act, 2008 - Section 13; Airports Authority of India Act, 1994 - Sections 22A, 28K; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 6; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Section 5(1); Consumer Protection Act,1986 - Section 9; Indian Companies Act, 1913 - Section 202

Commission established under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act,1986; (iii) which are within the purview of the Competition Act, 2002; (iv) relating to an order of eviction which is appealable under section 28K of the Airports Authority of