Advanced Search Results

Competition Commission of India Vs. Thomas Cook (India) Ltd. .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

(in short, “the Tribunal”) setting aside the order passed by the Competition Commission under section 43A of the Competition Act, 2002 (in short, referred to as “the Act”) whereby penalty of Rupees One Crore 2 was imposed on the … funds under section 6(4) of the Act.20. On 4.3.2011, Central Government in the exercise of its powers under section 54(a) of the Act issued notification No. SO. 482 E dated 4.3.2011, commonly known as target­based exemptions, which reads

M.k. Rajagopalan Vs. Dr. Periasamy Palani Gounder

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

that where the resolution plan contains a provision for combination, as referred to in section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 (12 of 2003), the resolution applicant shall obtain the approval of the Competition Commission of India under that … party at all as this would mean paying to the same persons who are behind the Corporate Debtor. 54 *** *** *** 157. Thus, it is well-settled that a ‘related party’ can be treated as a separate

Rajasthan Cylinders and Containers Limited Vs. u.o.i and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

indulged in cartilisation, thereby influencing and rigging the prices, thus, violating the provisions of Section 3(3)(d) of the Competition Act, 2002 (for short, the ‘Act’). The CCI, as a result, imposed severe penalties in the form of fines under … conduct “stem[s]. from independent decision or from an agreement, tacit or express,” Theatre Enterprises, 346 U. S., at 540. While a showing of parallel “business behavior is admissible circumstantial evidence from which the fact finder may infer

All India Tyre Dealers’ Federation Vs. Tyre Manufacturers

Court : Competition Commission of India CCI

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Competition Commission of India CCI

Competition Success Review Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 9; Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867; Indian Post Office Rules, 1933 - Rule 30

Reported in : 2003VIIIAD(Delhi)442; 106(2003)DLT469; 2003(70)DRJ690

54-A, 54-B, 106A and 106B are clearly accounted for in the overall pagination of the said Special January 2002 issue of the publication entitled 'Competition Success Review' (English monthly). Notes (i) and (ii) below Clause 139 of … publication--'Competition Success Review' -- under the Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867. The petitioner's said publication i.e.. Competition Success Review (English monthly) is also registered with the Department of Posts, Office of the Chief Post Master … the period under consideration. The renewal is done under the provisions of Section 9 of the Indian Post Office Act, 1898 read with Rule 30

Union of India Through Executive Engineer, Mumbai Central Division No. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

provided otherwise was a clear abuse of dominant position. The respondent placed reliance on Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 in support of this contention. In the said letter, the respondent alleged that the respondent had always shown … case of RevaElectric Car Company Private Limited vs. Green Mobil (2012) 2 SCC 93 and in particular paragraph 54 and it is submitted that the arbitral tribunal can declare a provision of the agreement as void. Paragraph

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

all these proceedings, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, … challenge various provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter “the Act”). The specific challenge is to provisions of Sections 22(3), 27(b), 53A, 53B, 53C, 53D, 53E, 53F and 61 (“the impugned provisions” hereafter) of the Act and … found….‖ Thus, CCI is a commission of inquiry performing regulatory functions and 54. adjudicating even if no relief is sought from it; it is clearly

Airports Economic Regulatory Authority Of India Vs. Delhi Internationa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

or on a reference made to it by the Central Government or a State Government or a statutory 54 Competition Commission of India Act 2002; Section 53S(2) 55 “53T. Appeal to Supreme Court.- The Central Government or … in proceedings initiated suo moto by it since it is a dominus litus in such proceedings;49 47 The Competition Act 2002; Section 53S; Also see the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations 2009; Regulation 51 48 (2010) 10 SCC744[104]. 49

Monsanto Technology Llc and Ors. Vs.nuziveedu Seeds Limited & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

without prejudice to termination notice. CS (Comm) 132/2016 Page 50 of 96 65. The Parliament had enacted the Competition Act, 2002, some of the provisions of which came into force on 31.3.2003, its objective being to provide, keeping in … being directed to a plant tissue and claim nos.48 to 52 and 54 to 56 to a plant cell]. “Claim 41:―A method of producing a … injunction CS (Comm) 132/2016 Page 1 of 96 under Rules 1 and 2 of Order XXXIX read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) has been made, by application (IA24062016), resulting in some

Shiv Prakash Yadav Son of Ram Nath, Vs. the State of U.P. Through the ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2008(2)AWC1391

standard or criteria or indicia having a material bearing in the assessment of merit and influence the open competition and in such case the reserve category candidate may not compete for unreserved seats on account of variation … dated 5.10.2005 dismissing the writ petitions No. 42041 of 2000, 1187 of 2002 and 23630 of 2003 preferred by the appellant Shiv Prakash Yadav and … cannot be applied. The findings recorded by this bench in Para-53 and 54 of the judgment in Sanjeev Kumar Singh (Supra) are as under:53. ...An … application of Section 3(6) of U.P. Public Services (Reservation for Scheduled Casts, Schedules Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as '1994 Act') and despite the fact the writ petitions have been dismissed, the