Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: companies act 2013 section 342 · Page 1 of about 251 results (0.046 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 29 2016

Kal Airways Private Limited Vs. Spicejet Limited and Another

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-29-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

115. Both petitions are accordingly disposed of. Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 9, Section 17 - Companies Act, 2013 Section 42 (3), Section 42(6), Section 42(10) - Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 119, Section 201(1A), Sections 278B,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2026

M/S Huawei Telecommunications (India) Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant C ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-30-2026

Subject : Right to Information

inspect the books of accounts during the search.59. He has drawn our attention to Section 128 of the Companies Act,2013 to contend that a company is allowed to keep books of accounts or other relevant papers in electronic … to the judgment in the case of M.J. Exports (P.) Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax,[2025] 176 taxmann.com 342 (Bombay) wherein the Bombay High Court,while referring to the judgment of the Supreme Court in CIT v. HCL

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2026

M/S Huawei Telecommunications (India) Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant C ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-30-2026

Subject : Right to Information

inspect the books of accounts during the search.59. He has drawn our attention to Section 128 of the Companies Act,2013 to contend that a company is allowed to keep books of accounts or other relevant papers in electronic … to the judgment in the case of M.J. Exports (P.) Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax,[2025] 176 taxmann.com 342 (Bombay) wherein the Bombay High Court,while referring to the judgment of the Supreme Court in CIT v. HCL

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 30 2026

M/S Huawei Telecommunications (India) Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant C ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-30-2026

Subject : Right to Information

inspect the books of accounts during the search.59. He has drawn our attention to Section 128 of the Companies Act,2013 to contend that a company is allowed to keep books of accounts or other relevant papers in electronic … to the judgment in the case of M.J. Exports (P.) Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax,[2025] 176 taxmann.com 342 (Bombay) wherein the Bombay High Court,while referring to the judgment of the Supreme Court in CIT v. HCL

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2026

M/S Huawei Telecommunications (India) Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant C ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-30-2026

Subject : Right to Information

inspect the books of accounts during the search.59. He has drawn our attention to Section 128 of the Companies Act,2013 to contend that a company is allowed to keep books of accounts or other relevant papers in electronic … to the judgment in the case of M.J. Exports (P.) Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax,[2025] 176 taxmann.com 342 (Bombay) wherein the Bombay High Court,while referring to the judgment of the Supreme Court in CIT v. HCL

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 2016

Unitech Texmech Private Limited Vs. ATE Enterprises Private Limited

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-07-2016

Subject : Arbitration

herein that since the petitioner has neglected to make payment, the respondent vide its letter dated 14th October, 2013 sought to initiate the arbitral proceedings and gave final opportunity to the petitioner to make payment however, the … of Vachaspati Sharma vs. India Cements Capital and Finance Ltd., 2013(6) Mh.L.J. 342 and in particular paragraphs 9 and 10 and would submit that the … 1. By this petition filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the said Act ) the petitioner has impugned an arbitral award dated 7th May, 2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2017

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-21-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

next day, purporting to curtail - by exercising discretion under proviso to Section 220 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act), the normal period for complying with demand for payment (income tax) from 30 … The learned counsel highlights that for previous years i.e. AY199697, 2001-02, 2004-05, 2007-08 and a subsequent year i.e. 2013-14, such income has been treated as arisen from insurance business. It is further submitted that such investments were … to a determined penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for the sum of ` 342.7 crores. The assessee/ W.P.(C) 2602/2017 Page 1 of 11 petitioner contends that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 2017

M/S Lifelong Meditech p.ltd vs.m/s United India Insurance co.ltd

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-22-2017

Subject : Arbitration

arrived at by the Surveyor. This was contrary to the Schedule II-Useful Lives to compute depreciation under the Companies Act, 2013. It is submitted that in support, this provision having been drawn to the attention of the Arbitrator and … Ltd. v. B.H.H. Securities (P) Ltd.[(2012) 1 SCC594: (2012) 1 SCC (Civ) 342]. , this Court held: (SCC pp. 601-02, para21) OMP(COMM) 569/2016 Page 18 … ..... Respondent Through Mr.A.K. De and Ms.Ananya De, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) has been filed by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 2019

Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-25-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

debtor, such as undischarged insolvents and persons who have been removed as directors under Section 164 of the Companies Act, 2013 (for not filing financial statements or annual returns for any continuous period of 3 financial years, for example). … We refuse to sit as a ―superlegislature to weigh the wisdom of legislation,‖ [Day-Brite Lighting, Inc., v. Missouri, 342 U.S. 421, 423 (1923)]. and we emphatically refuse to go back to the time when courts used the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 2022

Mohd. Firoz Vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-19-2022

Subject : Criminal

of Judicature, Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur, in the Criminal Reference No.09 of 2013, Criminal Appeal No.2920 of 2013 and Criminal Appeal No.3132 of 2013. During … to prevent the attack on the victim. This was contradicted by the statement of the accused himself under Section 342 CrPC to the effect that he had received the injury in a scuffle with a herdsman. The injury … IPC and under section 5(i), 5(m) and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from the Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the POCSO Act), and the accused Rakesh Choudhary was charged for the offences

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial