Advanced Search Results
D.P. Lon Vs. Collector of Central Excise and Customs
Supreme Court of India
Mar-13-2003
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 14; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9(1), 173, 173F, 173Q, 173Q(1) and 174
AIR2003SC1399; 2003(86)ECC521; 2003(153)ELT269(SC); JT2003(3)SC258; 2003(3)SCALE378; (2003)5SCC97; [2003]2SCR1125; [2003]132STC525(SC)
22.5.1986, the doubled and/or multifold yarns falling under Chapter 54 or Chapter 55 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 were wholly exempted from the duty of excise leviable thereon, provided such doubled or multifolded yarns were manufactured
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaturalle Health Products (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Hy ...
Supreme Court of India
Nov-11-2003
Excise
Drugs and Cosmetic Act, 1940 - Sections 2 and 3; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173B; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35L(B); Cental Excise Tariff Act, 1985
2003(90)ECC505; 2003LC513(SC); 2003(158)ELT257(SC); 2003(9)SCALE542; (2004)9SCC136
classification of a product for Central Excise duty under the Central Excise and Salt Act 1944 and the Central Excise Tariff Act 1985 and that when there is no definition of any word in the relevant statute, the word must be … 1996 is: 3. Whether the products 'Sloan's Balm' and 'Sloan's Rub' are ayurvedic medicines and are classifiable under Chapter Heading 3003-30 as contended by the appellants attracting nil rate duty OR Classified under Chapter sub-heading 3003.10 chargeable
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise, Belgaum Vs. Akay Cosmetics (P) Ltd., H ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-01-2005
Excise
Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4(4) and 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985
AIR2005SC4098; 2005(99)ECC647; (2005)3SCC785
hair colour sold under the brand name 'Binge' falling under chapter sub-heading 3305.90 of the schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They were selling their entire production to M/s Nemaru Coiffure (for short 'M/s Nemaru'). There was a dispute
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jaypee Forges Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-21-1995
Land Acquisition
(1996)(83)ELT49TriDel
is that the appellants claimed that their products were classifiable under Chapter 72 or Chapter 73 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 whereas the department was of the view that the forgings had acquired the essential character of motor vehicles … they constitute integral parts of engines or motors, articles of Heading No. 8483. Reference in Chapter 86 to 88 to parts or 'accessories' do not apply to parts or accessories which are not suitable for use solely
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.K. Refineries and Metal (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. General Manager, India ...
Kolkata
Aug-08-2007
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; ;Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2(1), 3, 11B, 11B(2) and 35; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1), 56A, 57 and 57A
2007(4)CHN18
a declaration that C.N. Dross comes under sub-heading No. 2620.00 of Chapter 26 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and it comes within the purview of exemption of Central Excise Duty in terms of Notification No. 19/88/CE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJohnson and Johnson Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Sep-12-1996
Land Acquisition
(1996)(88)ELT465TriDel
Matched in: Citation (1996)(88)ELT465TriDel
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEagle Flask Industries Limited Vs. the Commissioner of Central Excise, ...
Supreme Court of India
Sep-02-2004
Service
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 174 and 174A; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944
2004(96)ECC118; 2004(171)ELT296(SC); JT2004(7)SC391; 2004(7)SCALE453; (2004)7SCC377
from the operation of Rule 174 of the Rules. The goods are specified in the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (in short 'the Tariff Act'). The proviso makes it clear that where goods are chargeable to nil rate … penalty imposed for failure to take out L-4 licence required for the manufacture of excisable goods falling under Chapter headings No. 3924.90 (Casserole) and 3909.60 (Rigid Polyurethane Foam) falling during the relevant period and for the failure
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Jyoti Carpet Indus Vs. Cce, Jaipur I
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Apr-17-2001
Service Tax
(2001)(132)ELT458TriDel
Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNoble Synthetics Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Bombay
Supreme Court of India
Mar-17-2005
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 56, 56(2), 56(4), 173B(4) and 173Q(2); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A
AIR2005SC4053; 2005(2)CTC458; 2005(99)ECC353; 2005(182)ELT27(SC); JT2005(3)SC435; (2005)3SCC674
aforesaid products as acrylic polymers in primary form under Chapter Sub-heading 3906.90 of the first schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 claiming concessional rate of duty @ 40% ad valorem in terms of Sr. No. 42 of the schedule
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThungabhadra Steel Products Ltd. Vs. Uoi and ors.
Karnataka
Mar-21-1997
Excise
Central Excise Act - Sections 2
1997(58)ECC26; 1998(98)ELT334(Kar); ILR1997KAR1301; 1997(3)KarLJ601
there was an amendment to the definition of goods by Act 5/1986 where the words 'Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985' have been introduced. We are giving below the old Section 2 as well as new Section : - … the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. Now, after amendment, the provision that has been made applicable is Chapter 7308.90. Tariff Item No. 69 of Schedule-I reads as 'all other goods, not elsewhere specified', while under Chapter
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »