Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: central excise tariff act 1985 chapter 88 · Page 1 of about 549 results (0.069 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 13 2003

D.P. Lon Vs. Collector of Central Excise and Customs

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-13-2003

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 14; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 9(1), 173, 173F, 173Q, 173Q(1) and 174

Reported in : AIR2003SC1399; 2003(86)ECC521; 2003(153)ELT269(SC); JT2003(3)SC258; 2003(3)SCALE378; (2003)5SCC97; [2003]2SCR1125; [2003]132STC525(SC)

22.5.1986, the doubled and/or multifold yarns falling under Chapter 54 or Chapter 55 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 were wholly exempted from the duty of excise leviable thereon, provided such doubled or multifolded yarns were manufactured

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 2003

Naturalle Health Products (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Hy ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-11-2003

Subject : Excise

Acts : Drugs and Cosmetic Act, 1940 - Sections 2 and 3; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173B; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35L(B); Cental Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 2003(90)ECC505; 2003LC513(SC); 2003(158)ELT257(SC); 2003(9)SCALE542; (2004)9SCC136

classification of a product for Central Excise duty under the Central Excise and Salt Act 1944 and the Central Excise Tariff Act 1985 and that when there is no definition of any word in the relevant statute, the word must be … 1996 is: 3. Whether the products 'Sloan's Balm' and 'Sloan's Rub' are ayurvedic medicines and are classifiable under Chapter Heading 3003-30 as contended by the appellants attracting nil rate duty OR Classified under Chapter sub-heading 3003.10 chargeable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2005

Commissioner of Central Excise, Belgaum Vs. Akay Cosmetics (P) Ltd., H ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-01-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4(4) and 35L; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : AIR2005SC4098; 2005(99)ECC647; (2005)3SCC785

hair colour sold under the brand name 'Binge' falling under chapter sub-heading 3305.90 of the schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They were selling their entire production to M/s Nemaru Coiffure (for short 'M/s Nemaru'). There was a dispute

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 21 1995

Jaypee Forges Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-21-1995

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1996)(83)ELT49TriDel

is that the appellants claimed that their products were classifiable under Chapter 72 or Chapter 73 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 whereas the department was of the view that the forgings had acquired the essential character of motor vehicles … they constitute integral parts of engines or motors, articles of Heading No. 8483. Reference in Chapter 86 to 88 to parts or 'accessories' do not apply to parts or accessories which are not suitable for use solely

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 2007

R.K. Refineries and Metal (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. General Manager, India ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-08-2007

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; ;Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2(1), 3, 11B, 11B(2) and 35; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1), 56A, 57 and 57A

Reported in : 2007(4)CHN18

a declaration that C.N. Dross comes under sub-heading No. 2620.00 of Chapter 26 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and it comes within the purview of exemption of Central Excise Duty in terms of Notification No. 19/88/CE

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 1996

Johnson and Johnson Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Sep-12-1996

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1996)(88)ELT465TriDel

Matched in: Citation (1996)(88)ELT465TriDel

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 2004

Eagle Flask Industries Limited Vs. the Commissioner of Central Excise, ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-02-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 174 and 174A; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Act, 1944

Reported in : 2004(96)ECC118; 2004(171)ELT296(SC); JT2004(7)SC391; 2004(7)SCALE453; (2004)7SCC377

from the operation of Rule 174 of the Rules. The goods are specified in the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (in short 'the Tariff Act'). The proviso makes it clear that where goods are chargeable to nil rate … penalty imposed for failure to take out L-4 licence required for the manufacture of excisable goods falling under Chapter headings No. 3924.90 (Casserole) and 3909.60 (Rigid Polyurethane Foam) falling during the relevant period and for the failure

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2001

M/S Jyoti Carpet Indus Vs. Cce, Jaipur I

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Apr-17-2001

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2001)(132)ELT458TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2005

Noble Synthetics Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-17-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 56, 56(2), 56(4), 173B(4) and 173Q(2); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A

Reported in : AIR2005SC4053; 2005(2)CTC458; 2005(99)ECC353; 2005(182)ELT27(SC); JT2005(3)SC435; (2005)3SCC674

aforesaid products as acrylic polymers in primary form under Chapter Sub-heading 3906.90 of the first schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 claiming concessional rate of duty @ 40% ad valorem in terms of Sr. No. 42 of the schedule

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 1997

Thungabhadra Steel Products Ltd. Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-21-1997

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 2

Reported in : 1997(58)ECC26; 1998(98)ELT334(Kar); ILR1997KAR1301; 1997(3)KarLJ601

there was an amendment to the definition of goods by Act 5/1986 where the words 'Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985' have been introduced. We are giving below the old Section 2 as well as new Section : - … the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. Now, after amendment, the provision that has been made applicable is Chapter 7308.90. Tariff Item No. 69 of Schedule-I reads as 'all other goods, not elsewhere specified', while under Chapter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial