Advanced Search Results
Patel Roadways Limited Vs. Birla Yamaha Limited
Supreme Court of India
Mar-28-2000
Consumer
Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1), 10, 13 13(4), 13(5), 13(6), 14(1), 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25; Court of Wards Act, 1879 - Sections 51 to 55; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)
2000(3)CTC59; JT2000(3)SC618; (2000)125PLR816; 2000(2)SCALE559; (2000)4SCC91; [2000]2SCR665; 2000(2)LC887(SC)
Mohapatra, J.1. The core question that arises for determination in this appeal is whether Section 9 of the Carriers Act, 1865 (Act 3 of 1865) is applicable to a proceeding under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986). … the goods (Sections 1 and 2) as the party entitled to recover damages in respect of such loss (Section 7) Section 8 of the Indian Act was undoubtedly drawn with Section 8 of the English Act before the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSouth Eastern Carriers (P) Ltd. Vs. the Oriental Fire and General Insu ...
Kerala
Nov-18-2003
Motor VehiclesCivil
Carrier's Act, 1865 - Sections 6 and 8
AIR2004Ker139
contended by the defendant that the defendant is not a common carrier, As per Section 2 of the Carriers Act, 1865, 'common carrier' denotes a person, other than the Government engaged in the business of transporting for hire property … and rash driving and there was damage to the tins and loss of 43 quintals 53 kilograms and 700 grams of coconut oil. At the request of the 2nd plaintiff, an open delivery was given at the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Oriental Insurance Company Limited and Textool Company Limited, Ga ...
Chennai
Aug-06-2009
Insurance
Companies Act; Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 10
(2009)8MLJ953
Nirmala and Ors. reported in : (1997) I Scc 757, considered the scope of Section 10 of the Carriers Act, 1865 and held as follows:4. Admittedly, notice was issued by the petitioner on 5-7-1983 after the expiry of six
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
East India Transport Agency Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and anr.
Karnataka
Sep-08-1998
CompanyInsurance
Marine Insurance Act, 1963 - Sections 79; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69; Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 29, Rule 1 - Order 6, Rule 14
[1998]94CompCas141(Kar)
place to place. The defendant-revision petitioner is a public carrier in common law as well as under the Carriers Act, 1865. On February 16, 1985, the second plaintiff got despatched consignment of goods, having purchased the same from Binny … the suit, S. C. No. 8318 of 1997, may be dismissed for want of registration as provided under Section 69 of the Partnership Act. It is further stated that the goods were insured and the insurance company … made by their Lordships of the Supreme Court which read under (page 701) :'The section we are dealing with, is almost the same as Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTransport Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Veljan Hydrair Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-22-2007
Consumer
Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 10; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 24A
2007(3)ALD63(SC); 2007(3)AWC2175(SC); II(2007)CPJ35(SC); [2008(1)JCR90(SC)]; JT2007(4)SC8; (2007)3MLJ762(SC); (2007)3SCC142; 2007AIRSCW1527; 2007LawHerald(SC)1020
Disputes Redressal Commission ('State Commission' for short). 2. The appellant is a 'common carrier' as defined in the Carriers Act, 1865 ('Act' for short). The respondent entrusted a consignment (an Hydraulic Cylinder) measuring 2700 kg, covered by sale invoice … Respondent. It resisted the claim on the following three grounds:(i) The respondent did not issue a notice under Section 10 of the Act, about the loss of the consignment, within six months of the time when the … inspite of constant follow up, the respondent sent letters dated 8.8.1998, 13.10.1998, 7.11.1998 and 8.12.1998 to the appellant, calling upon it to locate the consignment
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s D. N. Singh Through Partner Dudheshwar Nath Singh Vs. Commissioner ...
Supreme Court of India
May-16-2023
Direct Taxation
gain.32. It may be noticed that Section 15 of the Carriage by Road Act, 2007, which repealed the Carriers Act, 1865, provides as follows: “15 Right of common carrier in case of consignee's default. (1) If the consignee fails … ............................................................ 42 K. R. B. JODHA MAL DISTINGUISHED BY HIGH COURT ...................................................................... 43 L. “OTHER VALUABLE ARTICLE” ........................................................................................................ 75 1 M. PRINCIPLE OF EJUSDEM GENERIS; NOSCITUR A SOCIIS ............................................................ 81 N. WHETHER BITUMEN IS ‘OTHER VALUABLE ARTICLE’
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Delhi Assam Roadways Vs. the Oriental Insurance Company
Delhi
Dec-09-2011
Land Acquisition
pleaded that the appellant was not a common carrier within the meaning of the expression as in the Carriers Act, 1865. It was also pleaded that the appellant was not guilty of negligence and therefore the suit was liable … Court decreed the suit of the respondent/plaintiff/insurance RFA No.442/2003 Page 1 of 7 company/subrogee for recovery of ` 4,75,972/- against the appellant/defendant/common carrier..2. The facts … Reporter or not? VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL).1. The challenge by means of this Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is to the impugned judgment of the trial Court dated
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSavani Transport Pvt. Ltd. No. 234-A. Kamarajar Salai, Madurai Vs. M/S ...
Chennai
Mar-24-2000
Insurance
Carriers Act, 1865 -- Sections 10; Evidence Act, 1872 -- Sections 91, 92 and 94
I(2001)ACC55; 2000(2)CTC567
inter alia that the suit is not maintainable in view of the non-compliance with section 10 of the Carriers Act 1865. The said consignment was to be delivered at Bombay to the first defendant therein as the address of … Has this Court jurisdiction to entertain the suit? 6. Is the second defendant liable to compensate the loss? 7. To what relief are the plaintiffs entitled to?5. The trial court after considering the documentary and oral evidence
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. M/S. Shere Punjab Co-operative Transpo ...
Delhi
Apr-27-2001
Trusts and SocietiesCommercial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 12, Rule 6; Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 6; Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 1972 - Sections 90; Bombay Cooperative Societies Act, 1925 - Sections 92(1); Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act - Sections 91
2001IVAD(Delhi)638; AIR2001Delhi400; 91(2001)DLT620
receipt and certificate dated 5th April 1993 constitute a special contract as envisaged under Section 6 of the Carriers Act, 1865, absolving defendant No.1 of the liability to pay suit amount. It is alleged that on said admissions of … Rs.20,49,873/- against defendant No.1, the defendant no.1 filed this application under Order 12 Rule 6 read with Order 7 Rule 11 and Section 151 CPC alleging that it is claimed in the plaint that defendant No. 1
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVidya Ratan Vs. Kota Transport Co. Ltd.
Rajasthan
May-03-1965
Civil
Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 5, 6, 8 and 9; Kota State Laws Act; Kota State Civil Courts Act - Sections 21
AIR1965Raj200
question as to how far the principles governing the liability of a common carrier as contained in the Carriers Act, 1865, could be invoked in the present case, as at the time the incident happened Carriers Act had not … State in the matter of common carriers. 10. There was Kota State Laws Act No. 1 of 1948, Section 3 of which empowered the State Government to apply or extend with such restrictions and modifications, as it … consequently the defendant company could not be held responsible for the same. 7. As regards the third point, the learned District Judge held that while
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »