Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: carriers act 1865 section 1 · Page 1 of about 338 results (0.049 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 10 1970

R.R.N. Ramalinga Nadar Vs. V. Narayana Reddiar

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-10-1970

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 1 and 2; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 2(23)

Reported in : AIR1971Ker197

of the Kerala State which was part of the erstwhile Travancore State and it is agreed that the Carriers Act 1865 was not made applicable to that area. That Act is in force only in those areas of the … 1. About the facts of the case there is no material dispute. The … necessary for the purposes of his business, not being a business of Providing transport, is a private carrier. Section 2(23) defines a 'public carrier as under:'2 (23) 'Public carrier, means an owner of a transport vehicle who

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2010

Economic Transport Organization Vs. Charan Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-17-2010

Subject : ConsumerInsurance

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2 and 14(1); ;Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 8 and 9; ;Consumer Protection Act, 1988 - Section 2; ;Limitation Act - Section 14; ;Marine Insurance Act, 1963 - Section 79; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 140; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3, 6 and 130; ;Stamp Act; ;Insurance Law

Reported in : JT2010(2)SC271,2010(2)SCALE427,2010(2)LC1004(SC)

in service, in view of the unrebutted presumption of negligence arising under Sections 8 and 9 of the Carriers Act, 1865. The appeal filed by the appellant before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Madras, challenging the said order … in sound condition was a deficiency in service, in view of the unrebutted presumption of negligence arising under Sections 8 and 9 of the Carriers Act, 1865. The appeal filed by the appellant before the State Consumer … Ltd, referred to as the 'Insurer'), covering transit risks between the period 11.5.1995 and 10.5.1996 in respect of cotton yarn sent by it to various

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 1974

The Associated Traders and Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Cloth and Gen ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-29-1974

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 6; Marine Insurance Act, 1963 - Sections 79(2)

Reported in : ILR1974Delhi790

as common carriers. (15) A special contract limiting the- liability of a common carrier is recognised by the Carriers Act, 1865. Section 6 of this Act, inter alia, provides that any carrier may, by special contract, signed by the owner … are carriers. They used to carry goods consigned by Delhi Cloth and General Mills Company Limited (respondent No. 1) to themselves or to their consignees in various parts of the country. The goods of respondent No. 1

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 23 1965

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Mahadeolal Prabhudayal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-23-1965

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72(1), 72(2), 72(3) and 77; ;Indian contract Act, 1872 - Sections 152 and 161; Carriers Act, 1865; ;Evidence Act - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR1965SC1755; 1966(0)BLJR91; [1965]3SCR145

Governor-General. Sub-section (3) of s. 72 provides that nothing in the common law of England or in the Carriers Act 1865 regarding the responsibility of common carriers with respect to carriage of animals or goods shall affect the responsibility … which had been consigned to Baidyanathdham from Wadibundar. This consignment was loaded in wagon No. 9643 on December 1, 1947. It is not in dispute that the consignment reached Mughalsarai on the morning of December 9, 1947

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 1998

East India Transport Agency Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-08-1998

Subject : CompanyInsurance

Acts : Marine Insurance Act, 1963 - Sections 79; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 69; Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 29, Rule 1 - Order 6, Rule 14

Reported in : [1998]94CompCas141(Kar)

place to place. The defendant-revision petitioner is a public carrier in common law as well as under the Carriers Act, 1865. On February 16, 1985, the second plaintiff got despatched consignment of goods, having purchased the same from Binny … Hari Nath Tilhari, J. 1. These revision petitions raise a common question of law and, therefore, they … the suit, S. C. No. 8318 of 1997, may be dismissed for want of registration as provided under Section 69 of the Partnership Act. It is further stated that the goods were insured and the insurance company

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 2009

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Through the Assistant Controller o ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-25-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 8, 9 and 10; Common Law and the Carriers Act, 1965

Reported in : AIR2009Bom185; 2009(6)BomCR385

whether the suit is not tenable against defendant No. 1 Salunke in view of Section 10 of the Carriers Act, 1865. Section 10 is as under:10. Notice of loss or injury to be given within six months - No suit

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2000

Patel Roadways Limited Vs. Birla Yamaha Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-28-2000

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1), 10, 13 13(4), 13(5), 13(6), 14(1), 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25; Court of Wards Act, 1879 - Sections 51 to 55; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)

Reported in : 2000(3)CTC59; JT2000(3)SC618; (2000)125PLR816; 2000(2)SCALE559; (2000)4SCC91; [2000]2SCR665; 2000(2)LC887(SC)

Mohapatra, J.1. The core question that arises for determination in this appeal is whether Section 9 of the Carriers Act, 1865 (Act 3 of 1865) is applicable to a proceeding under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (68 of 1986).

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2005

Basavaraj Yellappa Pundi Vs. the National Insurance Company Limited an ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-11-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 10; Indian Contract Act - Sections 151 and 152; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 130(1) and 130(2); Marine Insurance Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20 - Order 6, Rule 6 - Order 3, Rule 1 and 2

Reported in : 2006ACJ638; AIR2005Kant369; ILR2005KAR3403; 2005(5)KarLJ388

him.22. The main argument of the Learned Counsel in this appeal was with regard to Section 10 of Carriers Act, 1865, which reads as under:'Section 10: Notice of loss or injury to be given within six months. No suit … J.1. The appellant before this Court is the defendant before the Trial Court. The respondents are the plaintiffs 1 and 2 before the Trial Court.2. The brief facts that led to the filing of the present appeal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1998

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Kerala Transport Company

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-14-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37 and 41(1); Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 9

Reported in : [1999]239ITR183(Ker)

Officer was that the liability of the former being a carrier was absolute under Section 9 of the Carriers Act, 1865, for any loss or damage caused to the goods either on account of short-delivery or non-delivery or otherwise … of the Revenue, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal referred the following question under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (briefly, 'the Act'), relating to the assessment year 1985-86, for the opinion of this court :'Whether, on the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2007

icici Lombard General Insurance Company Vs. Parasmani Roadlines Pvt. L ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-14-2007

Subject : InsuranceCommercial

Acts : Companies' Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 433, 434 and 438; Carriers' Act, 1865 - Sections 8 and 9; Consumers Protection Act, 1986; Companies' Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 434; Carriers' Act, 1855 - Sections 8

Reported in : 2007(4)BomCR311

The submission which has been urged on behalf of the Petitioner is that under the provisions of the Carriers' Act, 1865, the Plaintiff in a suit for loss, damage and nondelivery of goods against a common carrier is not … D.Y. Chandrachud, J. 1. The Petitioner is the insurer of a consignment of goods consisting of … rights and remedies of the insured in accordance with the terms of the policy. 2. A notice under Section 434 of the Companies' Act, 1956 was addressed by the Petitioner to the Company on 26th July 2005

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial