Advanced Search Results

Smt. Shyama Devi Vs. Firm Ramjas Rolling Mills

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 97; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rules 59, 63 and 92

Reported in : AIR1979All16

of final Order - date of order of District Judge excluded - held, suit within limitation period. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … a civil suit No. 1 of 1977 in the Court of Civil Judge, Jaunpur under Order XXI, Rule 63 C.P.C. The application having been dismissed the present revision was filed.3. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that

Smt. Saida Begam Vs. Sabir Ali

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47 and 115 - Order 21, Rules 58 and 63

Reported in : AIR1962All9

- alternative remedy available under Order 21 Rule 63 - held, application for revision can be filed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Ram Bharose Lal Vs. Sukhdei and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1954 - Sections 5(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rules 58 and 63

Reported in : AIR1975All90

above question can be decided only by Order 21 and rule 63 of Code of Civil Procedure,1908. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tribeni Ram Vs. Satyadeo Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rules 62, 63(1) and 63

Reported in : AIR1966All20

of Election Rules, 1961 - mistake in counting - held, recounting is discretionary power of the Tribunal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Rai, appellant, 12497 votes, Rama Shanker Singh, respondent No. 2, 11058 votes, Tej Bahadur Singh, respondent No. 3, 6350 votes, Ram Jag Yadava, respondent No. 4, 3659 votes and Amardeo Ram, respondent No. 5, 3588 voles. As

Kothapalli Koteswara Rao Vs. Murukonda Subba Rao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 97(2) - Order 21, Rules 5, 58, 58(1), 59 and 63

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD609; 2004(1)ALT168

inherent jurisdiction to entertain it - held, suit instituted by plaintiff to set aside Order not maintainable. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … following principles of law.' (1) Old suits, that is to say, the suits instituted under the repealed Rule 63 before the commencement of the Amendment Act continue to be governed by the old provisions unaffected by the

Muhammad Habib-ullah Vs. Bird and Company

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1921)ILR43All257

of time--Failure to deliver within extended time--Damages--Loss of profit--Indian Contract Act (IX of 1872), Sections 55, 63. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Durga Singh Vs. Naurang Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1895)ILR17All282

in the preservation of the mortgaged property--Act No. IV of 1882 (Transfer of Property Act), Section 63. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Pragi Lal Vs. Maxwell and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1885)ILR7All284

Code, Section 111--'Ascertained' sum--Act XV of 1877 (Limitation Act), Section 22, Schedule ii, Nos. 52, 53, 63. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Punjab Lime and Lime-stone Co. Vs. Cantonment Board and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 60 and 116; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 128, 128(1); Constitution of India - Articles 13(3), 301, 304, 305, 372 and 366(10)

Reported in : AIR1967All15

levied by Cantonment Boards. The procedure for realising taxes is laid down in Sections 60, 61, 62 and 63 of the Cantonments Act. The Board is required to publish a notice specifying the tax which it proposes … O. 369 dated 1st of November, 1963, sanctioning the levy of toll tax under Section 60 of the Cantonments Act. The further prayer is that a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus be issued directing the

The Union Of India Vs. Bangalore North Taluk Public Greivances Committ ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

together with a report of any unauthorized structures or encroachment there on. 45 Section 3 of the Cantonment Act, 2006, is as under: “3. Definition of cantonments.- (1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, … right of defendant No.3 that it was not only matter of right of way or access coupled with 63 alternative access. On the other hand, it is related to substantial aspect of privacy, security to one of