Advanced Search Results

Nathu Mal Vs. Lachmi Narain

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1887)ILR9All43

313-- Rules prescribed by Local Government under Section 320--Notification No. 671 of 1880, dated the 30th August. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Sanjeev Bhatiani Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

No.2/DCB on different dates in respect of the subject premises under Sections 340, 248 and 320 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), be quashed.3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the … that the orders passed by the respondent No.2/DCB on different dates in respect of the subject premises under Sections 340, 248 and 320 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), be quashed.3. Briefly

Khaja Kutubuddin Khan S/O Late Khaja Moi Vs. The Secunderabad Cantonme ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

said premises without notice and without following due process of law, contrary to the provisions of the Cantonment Act, 2006 (referred to as new Act) and in violation of Article 300- A of the constitution of India. Petitioners … counsel for petitioners vehemently contended that even if appeal is dismissed, petitioners are still entitled to notice under Section 320 of the new Act (Section 256 of old Act) before demolition is taken up. Earlier notice issued under … Khaja Mansion, Road No.36, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad and another Petitioners The Secunderabad Cantonment Board, Court compound, S P Road, SEcunderabad Rep by its Chief Executive

The Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Vs. Banda Gopal Reddy

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1970 - Sections 320

Reported in : 2005CriLJ584

the stage of admission. Office to communicate the order to all the Criminal Courts in the State. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … had been caused to Tank Bund, a public property, without putting prosecution on notice compounding the offences under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'Code') is bad in law and hence, the

Delhi Cantonment Board vs.the Station House Officer P S Delhi Cantt an ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

in not stopping unauthorized constructions getting raised in the territorial jurisdiction of 'the Board' as contemplated under the Cantonments Act, 2006 (in short ‘the subject Act’). W.P.(C) 517/2017 Page 1 of 6 2. It is the case of the … iota of averment, for any such step having been taken but, for merely writing letters to the police. Section 320 of ‘the subject Act’ reads, as follows : “320. Powers of Board in case of non-compliance with notice,

Dhir Singh Vs. Peer Bux and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 21, Rule 90 - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1979All22

judgment-debtor - no substantial injury caused as such through sale - such sale cannot be set aside. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … decision of this Court in Haji Rahim Bux and Sons v. Firm Samiullah and Sons (AIR 1963 All 320) wherein it was held that failure to attach a property before sale did not render the sale completely

Fateh Singh Vs. Thakur Rukmini Ramanji Maharaj

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1923All387; (1923)ILR45All339

deceased husband made with express consent of reversioner--Reversioner not permitted to repudiate consent on succeeding to properly--Estoppel. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … authority is quoted in the case of Bijoy Gopal Mukerji v. Krishna Mahishi Debi (1907) I.L.R. 34 Calc. 320. Their Lordships go on to point out that, if a reversioner who had actually succeeded to the estate,

Mohinder Kaur Bajaj and ors. Vs. Dda and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

a house or have not been allotted on hire-purchase basis a residential flat in Delhi/New Delhi or Delhi Cantonment. If, however, individual share of the applicant in the jointly owned plot or land under the residential house … acquisition of the aforesaid property, she filed her return of income under Section 39(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1962 in Form No.2C for the Assessment Year 2002-03, declaring a gross income of ` 5,095.27.5. The Petitioners … and Anr. vs. P.S. Rama Rao Pissey and Others, (2004) 11 SCC 320.and the aforesaid legal position is now well settled. He also contended that

Radha vs.food and Civil Supplies Department

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

was contended on behalf of the petitioner, whilst placing reliance on the verdict of this Court in Delhi Cantonment Board Vs. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal and Ors. 129 (2006) DLT610 that as held therein the principle of … procedure otherwise, the constitutional mandate flowing from Articles 14, 16, 309, 315, 320 etc is violated. the regularization without (III) In case of existence of … that the respondent fell within the ambit of „Industry‟ in terms of Section 2(j) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and implicitly thus held that the termination of services of the petitioner on 31.12.2009 by the respondent

Council for Advancement of Peoples Action and Rura Vs. Shri Ramesh Cha ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

In this regard, he has placed reliance on the decision of Division Bench of this Court in Delhi Cantonment Board Vs. Central Government Industrial Tribunal & Others, 2006 (88) DRJ 7.(DB), wherein the Division Bench has observed:4. … Date of Decision:24. 01.2013 W.P.(C) 894/2007 and C.M. Nos. 1543/2007, 3985/2010 & 3986/2010 COUNCIL FOR ADVANCEMENT OF PEOPLES ACTION & RURAL TECHNOLOGY (CAPART) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Rungta, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Prashant Singh, Ms.Prateti … in lieu of notice period has not been made in terms of Section 12(1) of the Service Bye-Laws quoted above, simultaneously at the time of