Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 312 · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.046 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 31 1969

Banke Lal and ors. Vs. Jagat NaraIn and Damodar Das and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1900)ILR22All168

subsequently confirmed in suit for that purpose--Title of purchasers at first sale--Civil Procedure Code, Sections 311, 312. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1969

Kanhia Lal and anr. Vs. Hub Lal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1885)ILR7All365

in execution--Confirmation of sale--Objection that property is not liable to attachment--Civil Procedure Code, Sections 278, 311, 312. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1969

Mian Jan Vs. Man Singh

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1880)ILR2All686

costs. Sale in execution - Act X of 1877 (Civil Procedure Code, Sections 311, 312--Review of judgment. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 31 1969

Baldeo Singh Vs. Kishan Lal and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1887)ILR9All411

of 1877 (Limitation Act) Section 7--Order confirming sale before time for filing objections has expired--Appeal from order. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … objection, as the appeal must be considered to be one from an order under the first paragraph of Section 312 confirming the sale after disallowing the appellant's objection to the sale. The material point is whether the order

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 1966

Farooqi (M.S.) Vs. Anti-corruption Commission (by Chairman and Members ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Oct-31-1966

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1969)IILLJ78J& K

servant can be held only at the instance of the Government), and also unlike the Prevention of Corruption Act 2006 (under which no Court can take cognizance of an offence of bribery punishable under Sections 161 to 165 … state the provisions of the relevant articles of the Indian Constitution. Article 312 of the Constitution which was made applicable to the State of Jammu … Mal v. Nathu Mal it has been held as follows:A law pertaining to the control of rents In cantonment areas falls within the ambit of entry 3 of List I of Schedule VII under the Constitution. The … on their behalf. Preliminary objections are taken that the Commission constituted under Section 5 of the Jammu and Kashmir Prevention of Corruption Act, 1962, exercises

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 1951

Shri Prayag NaraIn Mehrotra Vs. Dr. Mangha Ram Kalani

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-25-1951

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 5(4)

Reported in : AIR1951All562

Munsif on these points. I dismiss the appln with costs. The stay order dated 6-12-1950, is vacated. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … a Munsifs Ct. In the present case, the annual rent payable was according to the pltf's case, Rs. 312 & it follows that the suit was well within the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Court of the Munsif,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 2017

The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 11 (1) Bangalore Vs. M/S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-05-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

It is also the ratio of the cited case of Natraj Stationery 312 ITR22(Delhi) vide page 14 supra. It has been stated in that case … as a municipality, municipal corporation, notified area committee, town area committee or by any other name) or a cantonment board and which has a population of not less than ten thousand according to the preceding census of … assessment under Section 263 to the extent it allowed deduction under Section 80 IB(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) and directed fresh decision on the said issue vide order dated 16th January, 2009. Thereafter,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 2023

Philip a Mullakkal vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-23-2023

to the whole of the State of Kerala except the areas which are within the limits of the Cantonments, Nagar Panchayats, Municipal Councils, Municipal Corporations and the Industrial areas of the State.”3. Subsequently, section 1 of the … through CBI Delhi v. Gian Singh, 2000 KHC 494: 1999 (9) SCC 312: 2000 (2) KLT SN 20: AIR 1999 SC 3450: 1999 CriLJ 4315: … is a private complaint filed by the Avanoor Grama Panchayath under section 210 of the Kerala Panchayath Raj Act, 1994 (for short Act 1994). The case of the complainant is that the accused has not paid the … to 235Z shall come into force on the 1st day of January, 2006.’4. The amendment of Section 1(2) of the Panchayat Raj Actby which the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial