Advanced Search Results
Shri Vinod Kumar Bakshi and ors. Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board and anr.
Delhi
Apr-11-2008
Election
Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 17, 28, 28(2), 29, 30 and 31; Cantonment Act, 1924; Cantonment Electoral Rules, 2007 - Rules 10, 11, 12, 13, 13(3), 13(7), 14, 15, 16, 17, 17(1) and 19; Cantonment Board Rules - Rule 13(3)
AIR2008Delhi131; 149(2008)DLT643
50,000 persons and consequently it is a category 1 cantonment.10. Prior to coming into force of the Cantonment Act, 2006, the Delhi Cantonment Board was governed by the Cantonment Act, 1924 which provided for seven members on the … 31, been found to have been guilty of any of the corrupt practices specified in Sub-section (2) of Section 30 unless a period of five years has elapsed since the date of the decision of the authority; or(h) … on 2nd January, 2008 by the Chief Executive Officer of the Delhi Cantonment Board, and have assailed the action of the respondent No. 1 in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskB. Lakshman and anr. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Defence ...
Andhra Pradesh
Nov-13-2007
CivilElection
Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 16(1), 17 and 54; Cantonment Act, 2006 - Sections 1(3), 2, 10, 10(2), 12, 13, 13(1), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 60, 360, 360(1) and 360(2); A.P. Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 62, 62(1) and 62(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 243B, 243P, 243Q and 243S
2008(2)ALD429; 2008(1)ALT443
19.05.2006, which was notified by the Government of India under Section 16(1) of the Cantonments Act, 1924, the Cantonments Act 2006 (41 of 2006) has come into force w.e.f. 18.12.2006. By virtue of the said Act, the Cantonment Act, … to as 'the repealed Act') and would submit that in the light of the language of Sections 12, 30, 34, 60 and 360 of the present Act, it cannot be said that the provisions are retrospective and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSecretary to Government of India, Ministry of Labour and anr. Vs. Regi ...
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-27-2002
Service
Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rule 30 and 30(2); Labour Officers (Central Pool) Recruitment and Conditions of Service Rules, 1951 - Rule 8(2); Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central) and CLS Rules, 1987
2003(1)ALD773; 2003(2)ALT190
for benefit of added service - held, CAT has wrongly applied Rule 30 (2) in allowing application. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
P. Narasimha Rao and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-29-2002
Commercial
Andhra Pradesh Indian Liquor and Foreign Liquor Rules, 1970 - Rule 3
2002(5)ALD784; 2002(6)ALT612
required to be formally published in Census - fee can be imposed on basis of provisional publication. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Licence) Rules, 1998 issued under Sections 28 and 29 of the Act through G.O. Ms. No. 152 dated 30-3-2002 the AP Excise (I&FL; Retail sale of conditions) Rules, 1993 were not made applicable for the excise year
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnited India Insurance Company Vs. Dasari Lakshmi and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-29-2003
Labour and IndustrialInsurance
Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 22 and 30; Workmen's Compensation Rules, 1924 - Rule 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41
II(2004)ACC508; 2005ACJ825; 2004(3)ALD176; 2004(2)ALT392; [2004(101)FLR1070]
to such appeals under Workmen's Compensation Act - held, objections does not sustain for want of provisions. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … 2001, arises out of a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, filed by the sole appellant, against R-1 to R-5, under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, questioning certain parts of the adjudications made by and set forth in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.J.M. Prasada Rao Vs. Chairman, Visakhapatnam Port Trust and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-27-2001
Service
Visakhapatnam Post Employees' (Classification, Control and Appeal) Regulations, 1968 - Regulations 8 and 10(3) to 10(23) - Rule 12; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rules 9, 9(4), 9(10), 30 and 69
2001(5)ALT381
justified in sanctioning provisional pension - respondents were directed to release full pension with interest at 12%. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … on 8-10-1997. As the respondent-Port Trust has not taken any decision, the petitioner was permitted to retire on 30-11-1997 as Deputy Financial Advisor and Chief Accounts Officer. Pending finalisation of minor penalties on retirement, the petitioner's pension
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChiristu Jyouthi Institute of Technology and Science, Rep. by Director ...
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-10-2001
Constitution
Andhra Pradesh State Minorities Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 2; Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1983; Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions (Regulation of admission into undergraduate professional courses (through common Entrance Test) Rules, 1993 - Rule 8A; Constitution of India - Articles 29 and 30(1)
2001(3)ALT589
claim admission - held, institute cannot refuse admission on ground of practicing different faith in same religion. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … him in EAMCET-2000 examination.5. The learned single Judge, inter alia, held that in terms of Articles 29 and 30(1) of the Constitution of India, the minorities have a right to conserve their language, script or culture of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Rajyalaxmi Vs. District Treasury Officer and ors.
Andhra Pradesh
Nov-06-2002
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 13(3), 166 and 166(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21
2002(6)ALD764; 2002(6)ALT353
Governor under Article 166 cannot be altered or modified by Circular Memo - impugned CM set aside. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … of her husband, as per Clause 6(ii) in G.O. Ms. No. 340 Finance and Planning (FW.Pen.1) Department, dated 30-12-1982, the petitioner was being paid financial assistance @ Rs. 100/- per month, which was enhanced to Rs. 370/-
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri Visakha Grameena Bank and ors. Vs. Karumetta Jagannadham
Andhra Pradesh
Feb-12-2001
Service
Sri Visakha Grameena Bank Staff Service Regulations, 1980 - Regulations 17, 19, 27 30 and 30(1)
2001(2)ALT434; (2001)IILLJ830AP
proved charges - held, quashing punishment liable to be set aside and matter directed to decide afresh. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … impugned order of punishment held: '... 03. Thus, the charged officer has violated the regulation Nos.17,19, 27 and 30 (1) of the Sri Visakha Grameena Bank Staff Service Regulations, 1980. 04. After carefully going through all the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP. Krishna Reddy Vs. M. Narasimha Reddy
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-13-2002
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 30
2003(2)ALD143
held, conduct of Judge reprehensible - Order passed to pass Order on next date fixed in case. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … nothing prevented him to hear the arguments on the LA. on the next date of hearing i.e., on 30-7-2002 and he would have pronounced the orders both on the LA. as well as on the appeal on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »