Advanced Search Results

Kali Charan and anr. Vs. the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Allahab ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 229B and 229C; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1956; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11

Reported in : AIR1977All56

'sirdari' rights - declaration of 'sirdari' rights by Revenue Courts cannot apply res judicata in subsequent case. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … referred the following questions to be answered by a Division Bench :1. Whether in a suit under Section 229-C of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition end Land Reforms Act instituted before the coming into force of U.

Cit Vs. Sb. Naseema Begum and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]258ITR503(AP)

133 and 134 of 1989. In the Andhra pradesh High Court S.V. Maruthi & T.N.C. Rangarajan, JJ. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … R.C. Nos. 106 of 1989, 107 of 1989, 116 of 1989, 133 of 1989, 134 of 1989 and 229 of 1990 the following three questions have been referred :'1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances

M.V. Krishna Reddy Vs. Govt. of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Contract

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 299

Reported in : AIR2003AP81; 2003(1)ARBLR446(AP)

tender set aside and authorities directed to invite all bidders who responded to tender notification for negotiations. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … for the said period in favour of the 3rd respondent. Contract - tender notifications - Articles 14 and 229 of Constitution of India - confirmation of tender excluding other bidders - confirmed tender admittedly quoted only the

Raja Ram and Another Vs. Joint Director of Consolidation, Allahabad an ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 23, Rule 3; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 4, 117 and 229B; Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 - Sections 4 and 9; Indian Contract Act, 1872; Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act - Sections 13; Rent Control Act

Reported in : AIR1993All72

- out of Court settlement and shares allotted - Government not consenting party - compromise not void. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … - compromise - persons bound by - Order 23 Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section 229 B of Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - all estates vested in the State

V. Jaya Prakash Vs. Commissioner of Municipality, Khapra Municipality ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 202 to 228 and 345; Andhra Pradesh Municipal Laws (Amendement) Act, 1992 - Sections 184, 184(1), 209, 209(1), 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215 and 229; Building Rules - Rules 2, 4, 5 and 18; Minerals (Validation) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Article 144; Mysore Municipalities Act, 1964 - Sections 187 and 187(3); Corporation Act - Sections 336, 336(2) and 340

Reported in : 2006(4)ALD807

Matched in: Citation 2006(4)ALD807

Gopal Krishna Vs. Lal Kishan

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92 - Order 20, Rule 1; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 331(1A)

Reported in : AIR1978All48

on him in subsequent proceedings - declaration of place of temple outside the scope of Section 92. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … that the plaintiffs could get the necessary relief regarding declaration by filing a suit for declaration under Section 229-B of the aforesaid Act in the revenue court claiming e declaration that the idol was the bhumidhar or

Cantonment Board, Meerut and anr. Vs. K.P. Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Cantonment Act - Sections 21 and 60

Reported in : JT2010(2)SC130; 2010(2)SCALE68; (2010)2SCC518

filed challenging the judgment in Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 60135 of 2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The High Court, … approved by the appellant vide its resolution No. 229 dated 29.09.2006. After the finalization of the tender, … entitled to the refund of the amount deposited by them over and above the bid given by them. Cantonment Board, the appellant herein has been directed to dispose of the application made by respondent Nos. 1 and … V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. Leave granted.2. Correct scope and applicability of the maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit falls for consideration in this appeal. This appeal has been filed challenging the judgment in … Court favouring the refund of amount, few facts would be necessary.3. Under Section 60 of the Cantonment Act, the Cantonment Board was empowered to impose

Bhola Singh and Others Vs. Indra NaraIn and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindar Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 229B; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 103, 107 and 107 (2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999(1)AWC62

not determined by Trial Court - High Court refused to interfere in present case under Article 226. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … filed appeal and the appeal was dismissed. respondent No. 1 filed Suit No. 112/296/123/267 of 1981-82 under Section 229B of U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act (in short referred to as the Act) in the

Abul Khair and Ors. Vs. Hon'ble Chief Justice, High Court of Judicatur ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 229; ;High Court Rules; High Court Orders; Allahabad High Court (Conditions of Service of Staff) Rules - Rule 9

Reported in : AIR1971All44

with the High Court - when he exercise the power conferred on him from some other enactment. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … nominee the Registrar, for the purpose of quashing orders passed in exercise of the powers conferred by Article 229 of the Constitution, the relevant portions of which run as follows:--'229. (1) Appointment of officers and servants of

Riley Vs. Kennedy

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

but execute the judgment.” Catlin v. United States , 324 U. S. 229 , 233. The August 2006 order declared that preclearance was required for … Kennedy decisions. A three-judge District Court granted the requested declaration in August 2006. It determined that the “baseline” against which any change should be measured … , 400 U. S. 379 , the question was what practice had been “in force or effect” in Canton, Mississippi, on that State’s 1964 coverage date. A 1962 state law required at-large elections for city aldermen, but … district of alabama No. 07-77. Argued March 24, 2008-Decided May 27, 2008 Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) requires “covered jurisdictions” to obtain preclearance from the District Court for the District of Columbia