Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 215 · Page 1 of about 17 results (0.032 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 18 2002

Smt. A. Santhi Kumari, I.A.S., Secretary, A.P. Social Welfare Resident ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-18-2002

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 12, 12(3), 19 and 19(3); Constitution of India - Article 215 and 226; Letters Patent Act

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD460; 2002(6)ALT326; 2003CriLJ1596

for not following Orders passed in writ petition unsustainable - held, no contempt of Court made out. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … contends that the Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under the provisions of the Act read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India cannot judicially review the order passed by the competent authority in compliance of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2002

K. Ravi and anr. Vs. A. Santhi Kumari

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-27-2002

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 12; Constitution of India - Article 215

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD633

only to consider and not to promote application - plea not sufficient - held, guilty of contempt. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … and the High Court can evolve its own procedure. The power of the Court of Record under Article 215 of the Constitution of India isnot limited to imposing punishment upon the contemner but the main purpose of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2009

Commissioner of Income Tax 4 Vs. Techno Shares and Stocks Limited and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-11-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(13), 2(36), 32, 32(1) and 47; Indian Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Indian Contract Act, 1872; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 11; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 6; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 17; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 22; Cantonments Act, 2006; Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 - Sections 31; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 13; Off-shore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2002; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 31; Patents Act, 1970; Copyrights Act, 1957; Trade Marks Act 1999; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4); Societies Registration Act, 1860; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3801; (2009)225CTR(Bom)337; [2009]184TAXMAN103(Bom)

Matched in: Advocate Vimal Gupta, Adv. in Income Tax Appeal (L) Nos. 971, 1942, 1944 and 1961 of 2006, Income Tax Appeal Nos. 218, 496, 718, 739, 1127 and 1207 of 2007 Income Tax Appeal (L) Nos. 946 and 1959 of 2007, Inc F.V. Irani, Adv. in Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 971 of 2006, Income Tax Appeal No. 218 of 2007, Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 1130 of 2008 and Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 259 of 2009, ;P.C. Tripathi and ;Vand

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 24 2003

V. Jaya Prakash Vs. Commissioner of Municipality, Khapra Municipality ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-24-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 202 to 228 and 345; Andhra Pradesh Municipal Laws (Amendement) Act, 1992 - Sections 184, 184(1), 209, 209(1), 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215 and 229; Building Rules - Rules 2, 4, 5 and 18; Minerals (Validation) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Article 144; Mysore Municipalities Act, 1964 - Sections 187 and 187(3); Corporation Act - Sections 336, 336(2) and 340

Reported in : 2006(4)ALD807

Matched in: Citation 2006(4)ALD807

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1999

Dr. Mrs. Renuka Datla Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-20-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 - Sections 87, 89 and 251(1)

Reported in : (2000)158CTR(AP)555; [1999]240ITR463(AP)

the Village Administrative Officer certifying that ganja plants were found in survey number '31/1' of the village. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the expression 'no Court' used in Section 362 would include the High Court also.;Constitution of India - Article 215 -- It is well settled that the High Courts in India are superior courts of record. They have

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2006

Anand Prakash Agrawal Son of Shri Dhan Prakash Agrawal Vs. Cantonment ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-18-2006

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 19 and 20; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 185 and 274; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rule 2A; Constitution of India - Article 215

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2854

Matched in: Citation 2006(3)AWC2854

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 2002

Diamond Hills Welfare Association Vs. Smt. Lakshmi Parthasarathy, Vice ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-25-2002

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Urban Land (Ceiling of and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 2(1); Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 38E; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 20; Constitution of India - Articles 129, 215 and 226

Reported in : 2002(3)ALT527

protect from the onslaught of the unauthorised occupants.25. The Contempt Case is accordingly disposed of. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Sheth's case (1st cited supra), the Supreme Court referred to the powers of the High Court under Article 215 of the Constitution and observed as follows:'There can be no doubt that the Supreme Court and High Courts

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 07 2001

L.C.K. Cement Ltd. Vs. Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-07-2001

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : 2001(3)ALT497

power supply from 800 KVA to 20 KVA as prayed for.6. The Writ Petition is accordingly allowed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 2004

Naresh Chandra Kapoor Vs. O.P.S. Malik and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-27-2004

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 12 and 20

Reported in : 2004(2)AWC976; 2004CriLJ2392

violation of interim Order prior to dismissal final Orders being passed in proceeding stands on different footing. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … would render Section 20 as liable to be regarded as being in conflict with Article 129 and/or Article 215. Such a rigid interpretation must therefore be avoided.42. The decision in Om Prakash Jaiswal's case (supra) to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 2022

Dilip (dead) Th. Lrs. Vs. Satish

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-13-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

Copy of the said objection application is annexed on Exhibit-H.10. In August 2006 the complainant came to know that when all attempts of the accused … 2 as accused. The Appellant is the owner of House No.463 situated at Darzi Bazar, Bhazi Market Road, Cantonment, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, which is hereinafter referred to as the “said premises”. The father of the Respondent No.1 was … that the Respondent No.1 and his mother filed a petition under Section 17 of the Hyderabad Rent Control Act in the Court of the Rent Controller, Aurangabad, seeking directions on the Appellant to provide electricity connection at

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial