Advanced Search Results

Gangavath Lalu Vs. Gangavathi Tulsi

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 213 and 213(1)

Reported in : AIR2001AP326; 2001(2)ALT437

decide afresh by giving opportunity to prove will and decide injunction by looking in balance of convenience. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that it is abundantly clear from a reading of Section 213(2) read with Section 57(a) and (b) of the Act that whatever prohibition contained in Sub-section (1) of Section

Administrator General, Uttar Pradesh, Allahabad Vs. Late Dharamvir Ali ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Administrator General Act, 1963 - Sections 7, 8, 9, 11 and 14; Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 57, 212, 213(1) and (2), 232, 234, 370, 371, 372, 383 and 384; Indian Succession (Amendment) Act, 1962

Reported in : AIR1997All158

letter of Administration - ground that person seeking succession certificate is not next of kin is invalid. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Section 370 of the Act No. XXXIX of 1925, no Succession Certificate couldbe granted unless the requirement of Section 213 of the said Act was satisfied. In this connection, the learned counsel has also referred to the provisions

Shri Shyama Charan Gupta and Another Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Mahapalika Adhiniyam, 1959 - Sections 15(1) and (3), 15-A, 16 and 16(16); Uttar Pradesh Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 3, 3(2), 6, 6-C, 6-C(1) and (2) and 30; Constitution of India - Articles 213, 213(2) and 357; Uttar Pradesh Urban Local Self Government Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 1992; Uttar Pradesh Mahapalika Adhiniyam, 1955; Uttar Pradesh Urban Local Self Government Laws (Amendment) Act, 1990 - Sections 8; Uttar Pradesh Clauses Act, 1897

Reported in : AIR1994All17; (1994)2UPLBEC1202

under Article 213 - amendment also fails period of notice falls back to what was before Ordinance. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Chief Executive Officer, Cantonment Board Vs. Tenzing Gopu Lama and Et ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

the offences are non-cognizable and bailable one. The same offence has been brought under the new enactment, The Cantonments Act, 2006 with the same nature of punishment.7. To resolve the legal controversy, it is also necessary to reproduce Section … Hon'ble Gauhati High Court in the case of Parimal Chakraborty v. Ranjit Debnath reported in 2004 (3) GLT 213 and Ramkrishna Singh v. Namita Das reported in 2006 (1) GLT 462. In both these cases also, this

Vikrant Forge Limited and Others Vs. official Liquidator and Others

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

to a scheme of arrangement sanctioned by this court on February 1, 2006 under which the demerged division of Venkatesh, including the second floor of … at AIR1939FC1(In re: C.P.Motor Spirit Act) which was rendered on a special reference by the Governor General under Section 213 of the Constitution Act and pertained to a statute in the Central Provinces and Berar relating to a … In Indu Bhushan Bose, the matter pertained to the operation of a State rent control Act in a cantonment area and the Supreme Court agreed with the High Court that the notification by which the operation of

V. Jaya Prakash Vs. Commissioner of Municipality, Khapra Municipality ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 202 to 228 and 345; Andhra Pradesh Municipal Laws (Amendement) Act, 1992 - Sections 184, 184(1), 209, 209(1), 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215 and 229; Building Rules - Rules 2, 4, 5 and 18; Minerals (Validation) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Article 144; Mysore Municipalities Act, 1964 - Sections 187 and 187(3); Corporation Act - Sections 336, 336(2) and 340

Reported in : 2006(4)ALD807

Matched in: Citation 2006(4)ALD807

G. Nagaraj Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act, 1995 - Sections 8, 12 and 13; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 451 and 482

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD(Cri)73; 2002(1)ALT(Cri)104; 2002CriLJ1980

the Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise.7. With the aforesaid directions, the criminal petition is disposed of. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Bhogi Ram Vs. Kishori Lal

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1928All289

amount was entered in an account from which a balance might at a future date be struck. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Prasad : AIR1927All292 , in preference to the decision an Sri Ram v. Sobha Ram A.I.R. 1922 All. 213, which latter, to me unaccountably, failed to consider prov. 3 to Section 92, Evidence Act. 1 would dismiss

Radhakrishna Rice Mill Company and ors. Vs. Jumma Maseedh by Its Mutha ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Wakf Act, 1954 - Sections 15, 15(1), 29, 42, 44, 69 and 69(1); Wakf (Amendment) Act, 1955 - Sections 32, 36, 42 and 56; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 92 and 93

Reported in : AIR2003AP70; 2002(6)ALD52; 2002(6)ALT791

wakf board have no power to grant lease beyond period - continuance of tenant beyond period illegal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … passed in EA No. 196/ 54 giving three years time to the tenant from 1-1-1954. (d) EP No. 213/56 was filed on failure of the tenant to vacate the premises after the expiry of the agreed period.

Maifoos Ahmad Vs. Rent Control and Eviction Officer/A.C.M. Iiird and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC897

dismissed. The interim order, if any, stands vacated. However, there will be no order as to costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … particularly in view of the Full Bench decision in Nootan Kamar v. Additional District Judge, 2003 (1) AWC 213 (SC) : 2003 (1) SCCD 71 : AIR 20O2 SC 3456, that if the occupant is occupying the