Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 212 · Page 1 of about 18 results (0.036 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 11 1962

A.J. Faridi and anr. Vs. Chairman, U.P. Legislative Council (R.V. Dhul ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-11-1962

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 168, 174, 183, 185, 185(1), 194(3), 196, 201, 203(1), 208, 208(1), 212(1), 226 and 246; Procedure Rules - Rule 143

Reported in : AIR1963All75

not ultra vires of the Constitution of India and chairman not acted in excess of his power. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … on that account.11. One of the questions argued before us in this petition relates to interpretation of Article 212(1) of the Constitution and it may be considered first. Article 212(1) of the Constitution provides that the validity

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1911

Salig Ram and anr. Vs. Chaha Mal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-29-1911

Subject : ContractCivil

Reported in : (1912)ILR34All49

and agent--Suit for compensation for loss caused by negligence of agent--Jurisdiction Civil Procedure Code (1908), Section 20(c). - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Procedure, which applies to the facts of the present case. The case is clearly one for compensation under Section 212 of the Contract Act in respect of the direct consequences of the defendants' neglect and misconduct as alleged.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2001

Sms Schloemann Siemag, A.G. Vs. Dy. Cit and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-26-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]250ITR97(AP)

Andhra Pradesh High Court (Full Bench) Satya Brata Sinha C.J., B. Subhashan Reddy & S.R. Nayak, JJ. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … ITO v. A.V. Thomas and Co. (1986) 160 ITR 818 (Ker), CIT v. Chittoor Electric Supply Corporation (1995) 212 ITR 404 (SC)< D> relied on. Pitambardas Dulichand v. Union of India (1999) 239 ITR 69 (MP); ITO

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 24 2003

V. Jaya Prakash Vs. Commissioner of Municipality, Khapra Municipality ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-24-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 202 to 228 and 345; Andhra Pradesh Municipal Laws (Amendement) Act, 1992 - Sections 184, 184(1), 209, 209(1), 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215 and 229; Building Rules - Rules 2, 4, 5 and 18; Minerals (Validation) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Article 144; Mysore Municipalities Act, 1964 - Sections 187 and 187(3); Corporation Act - Sections 336, 336(2) and 340

Reported in : 2006(4)ALD807

Matched in: Citation 2006(4)ALD807

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 12 2003

T. Seshagiri Rao Vs. Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Rep. by Deput ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-12-2003

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 - Sections 212 and 212(1); Rent Control Act; Punjab Municipal Act, 1911; Property Tax Rules, 1990 - Rule 8

Reported in : 2003(6)ALT100

findings, I do not find any merits in the appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … nature of use etc. He further contended that as the respondent failed to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 212 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 ('the Act' for brevity) the assessment made on the basis of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 1996

P. Dharma Rao and ors. Vs. Managing Director, A.P.T.T.D.C. Ltd. and an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-19-1996

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1996(2)ALT642

the circumstances of the case, the writ petition is allowed and the petitioners shall have their costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … representations made by the petitioners did not yield any result. It is stated that the Government issued G.O.Ms.No. 212, dated 22-4-1994 directing all the establishments under the control of the State Government to regularise the services of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2000

D. Sesharani and Ors. Vs. Managing Director, A.P. Women's Co-op. Finan ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-08-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (Regulation of Appointments to Public Services and Rationalisation of Staff Pattern and Pay Structures) Act, 1994 - Sections 1(2), 2, 3, 3(2), 4, 5, 6, 7, 7(1), 7A, 8, 9, 9A, 9A(2), 9A(3), 9B, 10(1), 10(2), 11, 12, 13, 13A to 13D, 13(1), 13(2), 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20; Andhra Pradesh (Regulation of Appointments to Public Services and Rationalisation of Staff Pattern and Pay Structures) (Amendment) Act, 1998 - Sections 3(1), 4, 5, 7 and 7A; ;Minimum Wages Act; Andhra Pradesh (Regulation of Appointments to Public Services and Rationalization of Staff Pattern) Ordinance, 1993; Kerala Essential Articles Control Act, 1986; Kerala Essential Articles Control (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Sections 11; ;Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 15, 16, 16(4), 19, 20, 21, 31,

Reported in : 2001(2)ALT607

the petitioners are working for more than a decade.156. The writ petitions are accordingly allowed. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … full time contingent employees and consolidated employees, etc., as there is already a scheme formulated in G.O.Ms. No. 212, Finance and Planning (FW.PCIII) Department, dated 22-04-2000.'4. In the light of the irrevocable stand taken by the Government,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 1998

S. Janardhan Reddy Vs. Principal Secretary Higher Education, Hyderabad ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-02-1998

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD570

after five years - G.O. applied both to Government as well as aided colleges - writ allowed. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Andhra Pradesh Teachers Federation, Hyderabad has represented to the Government in the reference cited, to extend the G.O.Ms.No 212, Fin dated 22^-1994 to Aided Institutions also.Government have examined the issue in detail and come to conclusion, that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 04 2002

M. Rambabu and ors. Vs. Director of Animal Husbandry and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-04-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2002(6)ALD140

on ground of availability of alternative remedy - petition not maintainable - petitioners entitled to approach Tribunal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … stand that the regularisation is being done subject to the fulfilment of the conditions in G.O. Ms. No. 212, Finance and Planning, (FW-PC-III) Department, dated 22-4-1994 and all the details had been furnished in the counter-affidavit.5. A

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 2001

Managing Director, Andhra Pradesh Beverages Corp. Ltd. Vs. M. Peter an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-27-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act; Andhra Pradesh (Regularisation of Appointments to Public Services and Rationalisation of Staff Pattern and Pay Structrures) Act, 1994; Andhra Pradesh (Regularisation of Appointments to Public Services and Rationalisation of Staff Pattern and Pay Structrures) (Amendment) Act, 1998

Reported in : 2001(4)ALT119

of their services strictly in terms of G.O.Ms.No. 212. The writ appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial