Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 209 · Page 1 of about 14 results (0.039 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 01 2001

Mohd. Abdul Subhan Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-01-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1978 - Sections 207, 208 and 209

Reported in : 2001(2)ALD(Cri)507; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)297

209 (1) (b) - bail cannot be cancelled as respondents have been appearing before Court for trial. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 09 1957

Babulal Vs. G.S. Hashmi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-09-1957

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Tenancy Law; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules, 1952 - Rules 115, 115C, 115C(1), 115C(2) and 115D; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 209; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR1958All97

of the encroachment or the repairs of the damage - stage passed - High Court can interfere. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … it is hit by the provisions of Article 14 of the Constitution.The argument in this contention was that Section 209 of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act provides for a suit for ejectment of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 1952

Mahadeo and ors. Vs. Satya Narain

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-30-1952

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 209 and 253; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 395

Reported in : AIR1953All36

- Magistrate has the power to discharge the accused under Section 209 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 16 1973

Samarjut Singh Vs. Dy. Director of Consolidation, U.P., Lucknow and or ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-16-1973

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47 and 144 - Order 22, Rule 10; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1951 - Sections 19 and 209; Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act - Sections 4; Uttar Pradesh Land Reforms (Supplementary) Act, 1952 - Sections 6; Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act - Sections 180; Supplementrary Act - Sections 3; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 52

Reported in : AIR1974All82

claim against the decree or the order of restitution ultimately passed on the reversal of the decree. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … vesting and that, at any rate, the opposite party having not filed the suit for their ejectment under Section 209 of the Act within the prescribed period, the petitioners became sirdars of the land in dispute by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 1917

Emperor Vs. Muhammad Yusuf

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-15-1917

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1917All408; (1917)ILR39All386; 40Ind.Cas.317

and 210 - 'Erect a structure'--Movables planks placed across a public drain in front of a shop. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Act provides that any person erecting or re-erecting any such projection or structure as is referred to in Section 209 without the permission thereby required or in contravention of any permission given thereunder shall be liable on conviction

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 2009

Commissioner of Income Tax 4 Vs. Techno Shares and Stocks Limited and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-11-2009

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(13), 2(36), 32, 32(1) and 47; Indian Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Indian Contract Act, 1872; Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 11; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 6; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 17; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 22; Cantonments Act, 2006; Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 - Sections 31; Insecticides Act, 1968 - Sections 13; Off-shore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2002; Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 - Sections 31; Patents Act, 1970; Copyrights Act, 1957; Trade Marks Act 1999; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 2(4); Societies Registration Act, 1860; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1)

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3801; (2009)225CTR(Bom)337; [2009]184TAXMAN103(Bom)

Matched in: Advocate Vimal Gupta, Adv. in Income Tax Appeal (L) Nos. 971, 1942, 1944 and 1961 of 2006, Income Tax Appeal Nos. 218, 496, 718, 739, 1127 and 1207 of 2007 Income Tax Appeal (L) Nos. 946 and 1959 of 2007, Inc F.V. Irani, Adv. in Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 971 of 2006, Income Tax Appeal No. 218 of 2007, Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 1130 of 2008 and Income Tax Appeal (L) No. 259 of 2009, ;P.C. Tripathi and ;Vand

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2003

V. Jaya Prakash Vs. Commissioner of Municipality, Khapra Municipality ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-24-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 202 to 228 and 345; Andhra Pradesh Municipal Laws (Amendement) Act, 1992 - Sections 184, 184(1), 209, 209(1), 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215 and 229; Building Rules - Rules 2, 4, 5 and 18; Minerals (Validation) Act, 1992; Constitution of India - Article 144; Mysore Municipalities Act, 1964 - Sections 187 and 187(3); Corporation Act - Sections 336, 336(2) and 340

Reported in : 2006(4)ALD807

Matched in: Citation 2006(4)ALD807

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 2001

Sri Ramdas Motor Transport Ltd. and ors. Vs. Karedla Suryanarayana and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-18-2001

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10E, 10E(6), 10F, 43A(1A), 163, 209, 219, 284, 397, 398 and 402; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 19; Company Law Board Regulations, 1991 - Regulation 44; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 59, 102 and 114; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 9

Reported in : [2002]110CompCas193(AP)

Committee of Chartered Accountants appointed by High Court to determine valuation of shares held by minority shareholders. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … be taken by the person requiring it and did not move its little finger in the matter.323. Under Section 209 of the Act every company shall keep at its registered office proper books of account with respect to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 2015

Shobha Janardhan Masram Vs. Ganpat Gulabrao Thakre

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Feb-10-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

apply for the written permission of the Collector in the matter till 2006. In support of the submission on the point of limitation, Shri N.S. … through LRs. and another reported in 2006(5) Mh.L.J. 209. 4) Judgment given in the case of NakubaiValu … it is barred by limitation. ii) The Judgment given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Cantonment Board and another .vs. Church of North India reported in (2012) 12 SCC 573, on the point that … plaintiff had issued notices dated 06-01-1996 (Exhibit 42) and 10-11-1997 (Exhibit 40) which were neither replied nor any action was taken by the defendant in the matter. The plaintiff pleaded that the defendant tried to obstruct the … claims and disputes which may be notified by the Central Government under Section 14(1) and by the State Government under Section 14(3) of the Gram

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 2003

State Government Pensioners Association Vs. State of A.P. and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-10-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Pension and Gratuity Rules - Rule 9

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD338

drawn - held, illegal as Government liable to fix benefits on basis agreed between Government and employees. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … the decision in Nakara's case (supra) and also in Bidhubhushan Malik v. Union of India, AIR 1983 All. 209. Accordingly, they held that the directions contained in the State Government Order dated 7.9.1999 that the pensionary benefits

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial