Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: cantonments act 2006 section 104 · Page 1 of about 49 results (0.028 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 04 2003

In Re: T.C.i. Industries Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-04-2003

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 77A, 100 to 104, 192A, 391 and 394; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Buy Back of Securities) Regulations, 1998

Reported in : 2004(2)ALT14; [2004]118CompCas373(AP); [2004]50SCL450(AP)

to scheme - held, company petition is liable to be allowed irrespective of objections raised by Registrar. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … whether the company court has power to grant reorganisation scheme under Section 391 read with Sections 100 and 104 empowering the company to buy back the shares from the shareholders or whether Section 77A is the only

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 27 1998

Zafu Javeed Vs. V. Narasimha Reddy and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-27-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47 and 151 - Order 21, Rules 2(2), 35(1), 58(3), (4), 96, 97(1), (2), 98(1), (2), 99(1), 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 106, 107 and 110 - Order 29; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) Amendment Act, 1976

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD663; 1998(6)ALT608

Court under Order 21 Rule 103 - only miscellaneous appeal under Section 104 maintainable against such Orders. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2002

Palla Sampath Kumari Vs. Kinthala Venkata Rao and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-29-2002

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 6, Rule 4; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 34; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 104 and 114; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 59

Reported in : 2003(3)ALD115; 2003(6)ALT637

expiry of three years from date of registration of relinquishment deed - held, suit barred by limitation. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … - Order 6 Rule 4 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 34 of Registration Act, 1908 and Section 104 of Evidence Act, 1872 - plaintiff challenged validity of relinquishment deed executed by him in defendant's favour -

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 31 1969

Abbasi Begam Vs. Nanhi Begam and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : CivilLimitation

Reported in : (1896)ILR18All206

for a regular suit--Limitation--Act No. XV of 1877, (Indian Limitation Act) Section 4, Schedule ii, Article 104. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 1978

Deep Chand and ors. Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-15-1978

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 100 to 104 and 114

Reported in : AIR1979All47

of genuine sale - proper regard not given to circumstances by Deputy Director - sale not benami. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … parties shall bear their own costs. Criminal - presumption of benami transaction - Sections 114 and 100 to 104 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - finding of Deputy Director regarding sale to be benami challenged - registered

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 1958

Sat NaraIn Pandey Vs. Dhurva Narain

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-21-1958

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 96(3), 100 and 101 - Order 23, Rule 3; Hindu Law; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 104 and 114

Reported in : AIR1959All22

evidence of plaintiff - both parties lead evidence - question of burden of proof loses its significance. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … lower appellant Court is binding in second appeal. (iii) Evidence - burden of proof - Sections 101 to 104 of Evidence Act, 1872 - believing the evidence of defendant - disbelieving the evidence of plaintiff - both

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 1919

Nand Kishore Vs. Abdur Rahman

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-31-1919

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1919All82(2); (1920)ILR42All74

Section 104; Order XLIII, Rule 1(a) - Order returning a plaint for presentation in the proper court--Appeal. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1969

Muhammad Suleman Khan and ors. Vs. Fatima

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1887)ILR9All104

Clause 104, Section 15 - Revision of judicial proceedings Jurisdiction of High Court--Civil Procedure Code, Section 622. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 2003

T. Subbanna Vs. the State of A.P., Rep. by the Public Prosecutor

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-06-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968 - Sections 34 and 55; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 104(4)

Reported in : 2003(1)ALD(Cri)805; 2003(2)ALT(Cri)190; 2003CriLJ2150

the accused shall be cancelled. The revision petitioner is entitled for the refund of the fine amount. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … not followed the mandatory provisions contained under Section 55 of the Andhra Pradesh Excise Act and under Section 104(4), Cr.P.C.8. The learned Public Prosecutor contended that the trial Court and the Sessions Judge appreciated the entire evidence

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 2006

Ariselli Srinivasa Rao Vs. District Collector and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-07-2006

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 104, 104(2) and 194; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Reported in : 2007(2)ALD478; 2007(3)ALT124

to supra.16. With the above clarification, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules 13, 14 & 15: [H.L. Gokhale, Ag. … Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj had taken this Court through the contents of the counter-affidavit and also Section 104 of A.P. Panchayat Raj Act 1994, hereinafter in short referred to as 'Act' for the purpose of convenience

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial