Advanced Search Results

Mrs. Dosibai Nanabhoy Jeejeebhoy, Represented by (Byram Nanabhoy Jeeje ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act; Cantonment (Extension of Rent Control Laws) Act, 1957 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 28, 259 and 260; Cantonment (Extension of Rent Control Laws) (Amendment) Act, 1972; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 58; Cantonments Act, 1924; Government of India Act, 1935; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24; Cantonment Code, 1912

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR476; 2009(111)BomLR1014

land ought to be resumed. Mr. Shah has also invited our attention to the various provisions of the Cantonments Act, 1924. He submitted that under the Cantonment laws, a Cantonment Authority such as the Board is in the nature … the suit property. Exhibit68 is the certified true copy of the register of Government land held as per Section 271 of the Cantonment Code, 1912. In the remarks column of the said register, it has been stated that

Venkataramana Rice and General Merchants, Gudivada, Krishna District V ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Other TaxesConstitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Rural Development Act, 1996 - Sections 3, 5, 6(5) 7, 8 and 9; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 266, 286, 286(2), 301, 304(B); Haryana Rural Development Act, 1986; Cantonments Act, 1924; Haryana Municipal Act, 1973; Punjab Agricultural Produce Mrakets Act, 1961; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 14 and 15; Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD449; 1998(6)ALT74

be a city; area declared as an urban area; and place declared to be a Cantonment under the Cantonments Act, 1924. Section 3 envisages constitution of A.P. Rural Development Board consisting of the Chief Secretary to the Government as Chairman … A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd v. State of U.P., 1991 STC 271, enunciated thefollowing guidelines :'(i) legislative entries are to be liberally construed. But when a topic is governed by

J.W. Thomas Vs. Hanuman Prasad

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : AIR1929All837; 122Ind.Cas.675

and fact. The plaintiff sued on the allegation that, on 28th March 1924, the defendant executed and got registered a sale-deed in favour of the … under statutory provisions, and are as follows:(1) Register of Government lands held by lessees outside bazaar, maintained under Section 271, Cantonment Code 1912, No. 21 is entered in this register as leasehold.(2) Register of transfers of immovable properties, … and got registered a sale-deed in favour of the plaintiff, conveying to the plaintiff plot 21 in the Cantonment of Allahabad in consideration of the payment of rupees 4,000 Para. 3 of the plaint runs as follows:After … thereof.3. The issues framed were:(1) Has the plaintiff got any cause of action and right of suit?(2) Is he entitled to the refund of the

Sorrells Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

been "on his job continuously without missing a pay day since March, 1924." Witness identified the timesheet showing this employment. This witness and three others … to their business and their homes. And, in United States v. Katz, 271 U. S. 354 , 271 U. S. 362 , construing title 2, … a time in Haywood County, North Carolina, where he posed as a tourist, he visited defendant's home near Canton on Sunday, July 13, 1930, accompanied by three residents of the county who knew the defendant well. He … unjust, another construction should be adopted if possible. P. 287 U. S. 446 . 2. The National Prohibition Act, though denouncing generally as criminal the sale of intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes, was Page 287 U. S.

Ram Lubbaya Kapoor Vs. J.R. Chawala and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 - Sections 2(13); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 10

Reported in : 1986(10)DRJ359; 1986RLR432

a municipality or a notified area under the provisions of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911oracantonmentundcrthe provisions of the cantonment Act, 1924 (Sec Section 1, Sub-section (2) (a) of the Act). (6) Relying on this provision the learned … municipality or a notified area under the provisions of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911oracantonmentundcrthe provisions of the cantonment Act, 1924 (Sec Section 1, Sub-section (2) (a) of the Act). (6) Relying on this provision the learned counsel for … year 1965-66, a copy of which is to be found at page 271 of the trial Court record. Its perusal would show that while Raghbir

In Re: the Delhi Laws Act, 1912, the Ajmer-merwara (Extension of Laws) ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 445

Reported in : [1951]2SCR747; AIR 1951 SC 332

authorized the extension of certain chapters to certain areas with modifications. 261. The next instance mentioned was the Cantonments Act, 1924. By section 9 of this Act it was provided, that the Central Government may by notification exclude from … made by the Governor-General in the different statutes passed by different legislatures in India and extended to Delhi. 271. Illustratively, it may be pointed out that numerous end control Acts have been passed by different legislatures in

The City Municipality Vs. Nusserwanji Hormusji Madon

Court : Mumbai

Subject : LimitationMunicipal Tax

Reported in : AIR1940Bom252; (1940)42BOMLR491

The South Indian Railway Company : AIR1929Mad177 in the following words (p. 271) :-In the present case the mistake of law is a mistake as … for India v. Major Hughes I.L.R. (1913) 38 Bom. 293. In that case taxes were levied by the cantonment authorities and payment was made under protest. When the suit was filed to recover the amount on the … question of limitation were given up. Both the lower Courts held that Article 96 of the Indian Limitation Act applied, and as the mistake became known on December 1, 1931, allowed the plaintiffs' claim. In the appeal … plaintiffs' claim. In the appeal here it is first contended that under Section 206 of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act the act of the Municipality

Railway Express Agency, Inc. Vs. Virginia

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Bass, Ratcliff & Gretton Ltd. v. State Tax Comm'n, 266 U. S. 271 , 266 U. S. 282 -284 (1924). As this Court said in … Court's decisions sustain the application of a fairly apportioned general gross receipts tax to an interstate transportation company. Canton R. Co. v. Rogan, 340 U. S. 511 , 340 U. S. 515 -516; Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. … ] Railway Express Agency v. Virginia, 347 U. S. 359 (1954). Subsequently, the Virginia General Assembly enacted the Act here involved, levying a "franchise tax" on express companies, measured by gross receipts from operations within Virginia, in … property tax, and in fact the rate, as established by the latter section, has been used before the "in lieu" provision as a basis for