Advanced Search Results

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the Armed Forces Tribunal at Lucknow, which has been … Section 10 deals with salaries, allowances and other terms and conditions of service of Chairperson and other members. Section 11 deals with prohibitions as to holding of offices etc. by Chairperson or member on ceasing to be such

Jagraj Singh (No. 14412115k) Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India against an order passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal under the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. It is submitted that in view of Articles 136 (2) and 227 (4).besides, Article 33 of the Constitution … view of Articles 136 (2) and 227 (4).besides, Article 33 of the Constitution of India as well as Section 13 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007, this Court would have no jurisdiction to entertain the petition. … of “L. Chandra Kumar etc.v.The Union of India and others”. AIR 199.SC 112.and also that of Delhi High Court in CWP No.13360 of 2009 titled

Chittur Vettaikkorumakan Kavu Kshethra Committee vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

be heard by the High Court. The Apex Court held that sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 clearly provides that the Armed Forces Tribunal will exercise powers of all Courts except the Supreme Court or … writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionof India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P17 orderdated 11.04.2023 of the 5th respondent Special Tahsildar (LC Unit), Cochin Devaswom Board. The petitioner has also sought for a

Union of India and Ors. Vs. Vishav Priya Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

weigh with the High Court of Delhi but that factor would stand modified with the enactment of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 which came into force on and with effect from 16.02.2008. He further submitted that Note 5 below Section … found guilty and sentenced to be reduced to ranks on 4.1.2005. The contention is that the CO of 118 Field Regiment could not try the Petitioner by SCM since he was only 'attached with the Unit'. Delay

Davis vs Kuttumukku Devaswom

Court : Kerala

be heard by the High Court. The Apex Court held that sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 clearly provides that the Armed Forces Tribunal will exercise powers of all Courts except the Supreme Court or … MR.JUSTICE ANIL K. NARENDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1945 PETITIONER: DAVIS, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.ENASSU, KUNNAN HOUSE, PALAYAMPARAMBU P.O., KALLUR VADAKKUMMURI VILLAGE, PRESENTLY CHALAKUDY TALUK,

Prakasan vs Kuttumukku Devaswom

Court : Kerala

be heard by the High Court. The Apex Court held that sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 clearly provides that the Armed Forces Tribunal will exercise powers of all Courts except the Supreme Court or … DATED 10.09.2004 OF TRISSUR SRO OF THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE VERUMBATTAM DEED NO.160/1954 DATED 11.01.1954 IN FAVOUR OF PARAMESWARA MENON. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSIGNMENT DEEDS NO.1790/1974 OF TRISSUR SRO DATED

Prabhakaran vs Kuttumukku Devaswom

Court : Kerala

be heard by the High Court. The Apex Court held that sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 clearly provides that the Armed Forces Tribunal will exercise powers of all Courts except the Supreme Court or … MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 24762 OF 2020 PETITIONER: PRABHAKARAN, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O K K VELAYUDHAN, KALLATTUVALAPPIL, RAMAVARMAPURAM

Lt. Col. Vijaynath Jha Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Tribunal will have the jurisdiction to decide the matter relating to DGQA. Relying on Section 3(o)(iv) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, the appellant submits that his case is squarely covered by the said provision. The appellant who is subject … for deciding the issues raised in the appeal are: The appellant was commissioned in the Indian Army on 11.03.1989 in the Engineering Discipline. The appellant was subsequently selected and inducted in the Directorate General of Quality Assurance

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

had put to challenge, by way of an Original Application, made under Sections 14 and 15 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, in the Regional Bench, Guwahati, the legality, validity and sustainability of the Court of Inquiry, the charge-sheet, which … details of the call records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an … without informing anyone, made, before the learned AFT, a Miscellaneous Application, on 11.03.2013, which gave rise to Misc. Case No. 04/13, though it was within

Lt. Col. Pandappa Kotagi vs Union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

to:a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction declaring that Sections 14, 21, 30 and 33 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, insofar as they are interpreted or applied so as to exclude or substantially restrict the exercise of jurisdiction … prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to:a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction declaring that Sections 14, 21, 30 and 33 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, insofar as they are interpreted or … filed in the Supreme Court within sixty days Signature Not Verified Page 11 of 12the provisions. Besides, the position of law with respect to Article