Advanced Search Results

The Secretary To Govt. Of Kerala . Vs. James Varghese .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

January, 1981. (2) Words and expressions used but not defined in this Act and defined in (a) the Arbitration Act, 1940 (Central Act 10 of 1940); or (b) the Arbitration and Conciliation. Act, 1996 (Central Act 26 of 1996), … taking into 13 account the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (for short “UNCITRAL”) Model Law and Rules. The 1996 Act was enacted with the clear intention of harmonizing concepts on arbitration and conciliation of different … nothing else but allowing the State, abuse of its power of legislation. 8092. The Court goes on to hold that the awards made under the

Shiv Lal Vs. Food Corporation of India

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 114 - Order 47, Rule 1; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 14(2), 29, 30, 33 and 39; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 - Schedule - Article 119

Reported in : AIR1997Raj93; 1997(2)WLC203; 1997(1)WLN56

A.S. Godara, J.1. This appeal has been preferred under Section 39(i)(vi) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the judgment and decree dated 6-5-1988 passed by the learned District … may award interest. By way of an illustration, we may mention Section 80 of the Negotiable Instruments Act as a provision of the substantive law … repeatedly that observations in the said judgment were not intended to lay down any such absolute or universal rule as they appear to, on first impression. Until Jena case almost all the Courts in the country had

Laxmichand Dayabhai (Export) Company Vs. Prestige Foods Limited

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 - Sections 5, 6, 7 and 7(1), ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33; Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules - Rule 80

Reported in : 1997(3)BomCR90

in the Schedule to the Act applies. It may also be mentioned here that the Schemes of The Arbitration Act, 1940 and of the Act are quite different . Under sections 5 and 6 of the Act, any person … on the ground that the respondent was allegedly unable to present its case before the Arbitral Tribunal.7. Though Rule 80 of the Rules of this Court as applicable on its Original Side contemplates that the award to become

Rajasthan State Mines and Minerals Ltd. Vs. Eastern Engineering Enterp ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 1992(2)WLC19; 1991WLN(UC)402

N.K. Jain, J.1. This miscellaneous appeal is directed Under Section 39(vi) of the Arbitration Act, 1940 against the judgment of learned District Judge, Udaipur dt. 1.8.89 whereby the award given by arbitrator was made … against the judgment of learned District Judge, Udaipur dt. 1.8.89 whereby the award given by arbitrator was made rule of the court.2. The facts in brief are that the appellant is a company registered under the Companies

Tommorrowland Limited vs Essar Capital Ltd. Now Known as Vajresh Consu ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

refused to conduct the arbitration proceedings, which led the Plaintiff-Company to file petitions under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 before theHigh Court of Delhi. Vide the initial order dated 14th March,2007 in two suits filed by the … Judge: (a). reduced the damages awarded by the learned Arbitrator from Rs. 80 per Fully Convertible Debenture5 to Rs. 20 per FCD; (b). disallowed the … time without the Court’s extension(a) The Award dated 30.05.2012 was passed five years after the reference was made. Rule 3 of the First Schedule to the 23 (1983) DLT 261 AIR 2001 Del 424 BHATIA FAO(OS) 38/2022

Tommorrowland Limited vs Pressman Advertising Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

refused to conduct the arbitration proceedings, which led the Plaintiff-Company to file petitions under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 before theHigh Court of Delhi. Vide the initial order dated 14th March,2007 in two suits filed by the … Judge: (a). reduced the damages awarded by the learned Arbitrator from Rs. 80 per Fully Convertible Debenture5 to Rs. 20 per FCD; (b). disallowed the … time without the Court’s extension(a) The Award dated 30.05.2012 was passed five years after the reference was made. Rule 3 of the First Schedule to the 23 (1983) DLT 261 AIR 2001 Del 424 BHATIA FAO(OS) 38/2022

Tommorrowland Limited vs Hemdev Securities India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

refused to conduct the arbitration proceedings, which led the Plaintiff-Company to file petitions under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 before theHigh Court of Delhi. Vide the initial order dated 14th March,2007 in two suits filed by the … Judge: (a). reduced the damages awarded by the learned Arbitrator from Rs. 80 per Fully Convertible Debenture5 to Rs. 20 per FCD; (b). disallowed the … time without the Court’s extension(a) The Award dated 30.05.2012 was passed five years after the reference was made. Rule 3 of the First Schedule to the 23 (1983) DLT 261 AIR 2001 Del 424 BHATIA FAO(OS) 38/2022

Tommorrowland Limited vs Dolf Leasing Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

refused to conduct the arbitration proceedings, which led the Plaintiff-Company to file petitions under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 before theHigh Court of Delhi. Vide the initial order dated 14th March,2007 in two suits filed by the … Judge: (a). reduced the damages awarded by the learned Arbitrator from Rs. 80 per Fully Convertible Debenture5 to Rs. 20 per FCD; (b). disallowed the … time without the Court’s extension(a) The Award dated 30.05.2012 was passed five years after the reference was made. Rule 3 of the First Schedule to the 23 (1983) DLT 261 AIR 2001 Del 424 BHATIA FAO(OS) 38/2022

Tommorrowland Limited vs Navoday Management Services Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

refused to conduct the arbitration proceedings, which led the Plaintiff-Company to file petitions under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 before theHigh Court of Delhi. Vide the initial order dated 14th March,2007 in two suits filed by the … Judge: (a). reduced the damages awarded by the learned Arbitrator from Rs. 80 per Fully Convertible Debenture5 to Rs. 20 per FCD; (b). disallowed the … time without the Court’s extension(a) The Award dated 30.05.2012 was passed five years after the reference was made. Rule 3 of the First Schedule to the 23 (1983) DLT 261 AIR 2001 Del 424 BHATIA FAO(OS) 38/2022

Tommorrowland Limited vs Clarity Financial Services Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

refused to conduct the arbitration proceedings, which led the Plaintiff-Company to file petitions under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 before theHigh Court of Delhi. Vide the initial order dated 14th March,2007 in two suits filed by the … Judge: (a). reduced the damages awarded by the learned Arbitrator from Rs. 80 per Fully Convertible Debenture5 to Rs. 20 per FCD; (b). disallowed the … time without the Court’s extension(a) The Award dated 30.05.2012 was passed five years after the reference was made. Rule 3 of the First Schedule to the 23 (1983) DLT 261 AIR 2001 Del 424 BHATIA FAO(OS) 38/2022