Advanced Search Results

Som Bahadur Gurung and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1986)2GLR1352

of F.R. Jesuratnam v. Chief of Air Staff 1976 Cri. L.J. 65. It was a case under the Air Force Act, 1950 and there also a claim was made for set off under Section 428 for the period of pre-trial … a sort of a Criminal Procedure Code, for the Army personnel. Ch. XIII deals with execution of sentence (Section 166 provides for form of sentence of death, Section 167 provides for commencement of sentence of transportation or imprisonment,

J.W.O. B.K. Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227;; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 4(XV), 34 to 71, 110, 121, 152, 153 and 161;; Army Rules - Rule 37;; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 34 to 38, 40, 40(1), 43 and 43(2), (3) and (8);; Station Routine Orders

Reported in : (2000)3CALLT528(HC)

by any officer empowered for that behalf by warrant of the Central Government under section 153 of the Air Force Act. 1950 (for short 'the Act'). The respondent has moved CAN No 7513 of 1999 for vacating and/or recalling the … It appears from the annexures of the writ petition No. 18587 (W) of 1999 at page 164 and 166 the allowed chargesheet was prepared on 9.7.99 by the Group Captain/Commanding Officer of 6 Wing A.F. and the

Major E.G. Barsay Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120-B, 381 and 411; The Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52, 69, 125 and 126

Reported in : AIR1961SC1762; 1961CriLJ828; [1962]2SCR195

to this Act who commits an offence of murder against a person not subject to military, naval or air force law, or of culpable homicide not amounting to murder against such a person or of rape in relation … Act. 18. The argument of learned counsel for the appellant may be briefly stated thus : The Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) created new offences. Section 52 of the said Act created offences with which accused in … the sanction was void. This Article and the corresponding Article viz., Art. 166, were subject to judicial scrutiny by this Court. The validity of an

M/S. Bombay Intelligence Security (i) Ltd. Vs. Harinarayan Jeet Bahadu ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act,1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act,1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act,1957 (62 of 1957); … 3. On the aforesaid facts, Respondent no.1 approached the Labour Court at Mumbai by filing the complaint under Section 28 read with Items 1(a), (b), (d), (f) and (g) of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of … of JayhindVithoba Mahadik Vs. General Manager, Maharashtra Scooters Ltd (2004 III CLR 166)as taken into consideration by the Labour Court, was of no avail, as

Nutan Kumar and Others Vs. Iind Additional District Judge, Banda and O ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : TenancyContract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2, 3, 10, 12 and 23 to 30; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 6, 105 and 108; Constitution of India - Article 13, 13(3) and 141; Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 7(2); Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 11, 12, 13, 15, 15(1), 16, 16(1), 17, 17(1) and 31; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 15; Central Provinces and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949; Specific Relief Act; Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929; Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1969 - Sections 5(8); Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 166; Uttar P

Reported in : AIR1994All298

of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1969 and Section 166 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 and similar provisions in other statutes declaring transfers made in contravention of statutory provisions to be void, the … and inherent.The appellation 'void', in relation to ajuris-tlc act, means without legal force, effect or Consequence; not binding; invalid; null; worthless; cipher; useless; and ineffectual … cannot countenance such an agreement. 16. In the case of Waman Shriniwas Kiniv. Ratilal Bhagwandas and Co : AIR1959SC689 a Bench of three Hon'ble Judges of theHon'ble Supreme Court considered Section 15 of the Bombay Rents, Hotel

Crwp No.345 of 2013 Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

without confirming the proceedings, which according to the petitioner, is mandatory in terms of Section 152 of the Air Force Act, 1950 ('Act' for short).The petitioner submitted an application (Annexure P3) through proper channel on 29.01.2013 to the Air Force … is not in valid Air Force custody, in which, he admittedly is at present in terms of Section 166(3) of the Act, which reads as under:- 166(3)In the case of a sentence of imprisonment for a period

Jeewanpuri Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1973(6)WLN194

Service Estimates and not subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Indian Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934 and the Air Force Act, 1950. Such a person has to be in whole time employment of the Government of India under the Ministry … S.C. 600. A I.R. 1961 S C. 751 and A.I.R. 1955 Punjab 166 and came to the conclusion that the question of breach, if any, … punishment of removal and dismissal from service on the charges framed against him.3. After serving a notice under Section 80 CPC. to the Union Government, on 10-12-61 the plaintiff brought the suit in the court of Munsiff,

M/s. Bharti Airtel Limited Vs. A.s. Raghavendra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … annual package totalling Rs.22,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Two Lakhs) and thus, was not a “workman”, within the 3 meaning of Section 2(s)1, ID Act, the “appropriate Government”2 [herein, the Government of Karnataka]. referred the dispute to the Labour Court

Wg Cdr S. Yadav Vs. Uoi and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Judge R.C. Mishra, Member &Amp; the Honourable Mr. Air Marshal J.N. Burma, Member

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … Inquiry. To this uncomfortable question, too, there is, as usual, no answer from the end of the respondents. 166. In the circumstances of the present case, there can be no doubt that Ms. ‘X was the pivot