Advanced Search Results

Jitender @ Kalla versus State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1933

members of the Bar in the PermanentCommittee for designation is legally permissible under Section 16(2) of the Advocates Act, 1961, which confers the power of designation exclusively on the Supreme Court and High Courts.(c) Whether advocates practising in … in Indira Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India (2023) 8 SCC 1 for the designation of Senior Advocates require reconsideration in light of the experience gained and concerns expressed.(b) Whether the inclusion of members of the … laid down in Indira Jaising v.Supreme Court of India (2017) 9 SCC 766 and modified in Indira Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India (2023)

Sarjeet Singh Bhangul Vs. Bar and Council of Delhi ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Election

Acts : Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 3(4)

Reported in : ILR1979Delhi263; 1979RLR324

V.S. Deshpande, C.J.(1) The decision of this writ petition turns on the construction of Section 3(4) of the Advocates Act, 1961, which is as follows : 'ANadvocate shall be disqualified from voting at an election under sub-section … Deshpande, C.J.(1) The decision of this writ petition turns on the construction of Section 3(4) of the Advocates Act, 1961, which is as follows : 'ANadvocate shall be disqualified from voting at an election under sub-section (2) or

Narendra Singh Vs. Chhotey Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 7, 37, 37(2) and 38

Reported in : AIR1983SC990; 1983(2)SCALE84; (1983)4SCC131

Council of India enjoys all ancillary and incidental powers for efficiently discharging and carrying out functions prescribed in Section 7. The question of jurisdiction has to be viewed in this broad perspective and not from any narrow or … remand that has been questioned in this appeal preferred by the appellant under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961.5. Miss Thomas, learned advocate for the appellant, relied upon the decision of this Court in Makeshwor Nath Srivastava

M.R. Elavarasan Vs. The Commissioner of Police Chennai and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Habeas Corpus Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Constitution of India, 1950 Article 226 Advocate Act 1961 Section 7, Section 30 Bar Council of India Rules Rule 6, Rule 9, Rule 18 Issuance of Writ Production of

S. Mazhaimeni Pandian, Advocate and Four ors. Vs. the State of Tamil N ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 39A; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 7 and 24; Bar Council of India Rules - Rules 8, 17, 18 and 19; Tamil Nadu Backward Classes, Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe (Reservation of seats in educational Institution and of Appointment of Posts in Services under the State) Act, 1993

Reported in : (2002)3MLJ513

necessary to refer to the relevant provision of Advocates Act, 1961 and the Bar Council of India Rules.25. Section 7 of the Advocates Act, 1961 enumerating the functions of the Bar Council of India, provides that its functions … the basis of the rights provided under the Constitution and with reference to the relevant provisions of Advocates Act, 1961 and the Bar Council of India Rules. Though under part III of the Constitution 'right to education' as … same, as it was done earlier.2. The petitioner in W.P.No.25632/2002, a practicing advocate and social worker has prayed to issue a writ of mandamus, to

Gopal Krishan Chatrath Vs. Bar Council of India Through Its Secretary

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 7, 7(1), 49 and 49(1); Bar Council of India Rules - Rules 2(1) and (2); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 30-A and 41; Punjab University Act, 1947

Reported in : AIR2001P& H41

down standards of such education. In this regard, reference has been made to Section 7(1)(h) of the Advocates Act, 1961. Section 7 primarily deals with the functions of Bar Council of India, the relevant portion reads as under :-'7. Functions … J.S. Narang, J.1. O.K. Chatrath, a Senior Advocate and who presently also happens to be President of the Punjab & Haryana High Court Bar Association and

Supreme Court Bar Association Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationContempt of Court

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 32, 129, 136, 139-A, 140, 141, 142, 161 and 215; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 9, 30, 33, 37, 38, 35(3), 42(1), 49 and 50; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections, 10, 12 and 15; Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 4; Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 2; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 320 or 321 or 482, 386 and 406-407

Reported in : AIR1998SC1895; 1998(2)BLJR1497; (1998)2GLR1711; JT1998(3)SC184; 1998(2)SCALE745; (1998)4SCC409; [1998]2SCR795; (1998)2UPLBEC1320; 1995IBR118; AIR 1998 SC 1845

writ, direction, or declaration, declaring that the disciplinary committees of the Bar Councils set up under the Advocates Act, 1961, alone have exclusive jurisdiction to inquire into and suspend or debar an advocate from practising law for professional … of India Rules' (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) in exercise of its rule making power under the Advocate Act 1951.69. Part VII of the Rules deals with disciplinary proceedings against the advocates. In chapter I of Part … cannot assume that jurisdiction under Article 142 or 129 or even under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961.9. To appreciate the submissions raised at … independent of the statutory law of contempt enacted by Parliament under Entry 77 of List I of Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. The jurisdiction of

M/S. Lakshminirman Bangalore pvt.ltd Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of In ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Education

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE & STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SEC.234E OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLE14OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. W.P.NOs.3725/2014 & 9922-9923/2014: BETWEEN: M/S. K K BROTHERS … CROSS, 1ST STAGE PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA, BANGALORE -560058 BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR5 7 SRI T. VENKATARAMANA S/O SRI T.K. VISWESWARA RAO, AGED:45. YEARS. VIPRA MACHINE … ABOUT58YEARS SON OF SRI RANGARAJAN ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. S PARTHASARATHI, SRI. P. DINESH & SRI. JINITA CHATTERJEE ADVOCATES) AND:1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS, AAYKAR BHAWAN SECTOR-3, VAISHALI GHAZIABAD, UP- 201 010.2. UNION … CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AND TO HOLD THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION234 OF THE ACT AS ULTRA VIRES OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. W.P.NOs.3476-3479/2014

M/S Sapthagiri Shelters vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

& 227 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH SECTION 18-A OF THE KARNATAKA TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT, 1961 BROUGHT INTO EFFECT BY KARNATAKA ACT NO.23 OF 2004 (KARNATAKA TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING AMENDMENT ACT, 1998) AS … NAIDU AGED 40 YEARS S/O SRI RAMACHANDRA NAIDU ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUDHAKAR G V & SRI. LOKESH L.N., ADVOCATES) AND1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE - … COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTRERED OFFICE AT: 79, BEHIND 49TH MAIN ROAD, 2ND STAGE, YESHWANTHPUR INDUSTRIAL AREA, PHASE 2, YESHWANTHPURA,

Niranjan Soni Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 49; Standards of Professional Conduct and Etiquette Rules - Rule 1; Constitution of India

Reported in : 1999(2)MPLJ156

Rules and in regard to the rules framed by the High Court under Section 34 of the Advocates Act, 1961. He is supposed to know that the memo of appearance is not an application and no endorsement can … filed and the order dated 12-12-1997, it was stated that 'In paragraphs 7 and 9, certain allegations have been made against the Court, are mentioned. … Soni, (numbered as Misc. Criminal Case No. 1140/97) was moved before this Court by Shri N. S. Ruprah, Advocate, which, after hearing him, was rejected on 28-3-1997. Subsequent thereto, another application, (numbered as Misc. Criminal Case No.