Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: advocate act 1961 section 48b · Page 1 of about 5 results (0.024 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 10 2023

Bar Council Of India Vs. Bonnie Foi Law College .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-10-2023

Subject : MRTP

T.C.(C) No.17/2011 T.C.(C) No.18/2011 JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.Leave granted. 1 The Advocates Act:1. The Advocates Act, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”) … T.C.(C) No.8/2012 T.C.(C) No.17/2011 T.C.(C) No.18/2011 JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.Leave granted. 1 The Advocates Act:1. The Advocates Act, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”) was the consequence of a deeply felt need for change in … of India to consider. g. The Bar Council of India can exercise its power to issue directions under Section 48B of the said Act to ensure uniformity and fairness of the procedure followed by each of the State

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 18 1974

Ravi Kiran JaIn and ors. Vs. Bar Council of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-18-1974

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 15; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Advocates Rules - Rules 4, 20 to 31, 32 and 32(5); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1975All190

to the Bar Council of India to take recourse to Sub-section (2) of Section 48B of the Advocates Act, 1961, and to hold fresh elections under its auspices according to law. 2. The Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, … been removed. (ii) Writ - Article 226 of Constitution of India - statutory remedy is available under the Advocate Act and the Rules - Court does not interfere with election dispute under Article 226 - Statutory Tribunal is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2007

D. Rathinam Vs. the Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-03-2007

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4(1), 6, 9, 11, 16, 17, 17A, 23, 35, 40, 47 and 48B; Tamil Nadu Housing Board Act, 1961 - Sections 2(9), 4 and 72; Tamil Nadu Housing Board (Amendment) Act, 1996 - Sections 16B

Reported in : (2008)2MLJ530

was acquired, was required for any other public purpose; that Section 2(9) of the Tamil Nadu Housing Board Act, 1961, defines 'Housing or improvement scheme' which means a scheme framed under this Act, and includes any one other … they remained unutilized and also differential treatment cannot be given to different owners. Pending such W.P. No. 10572/86, Section 48B of the Land Acquisition Act was introduced as far as the State is concerned. The petitioner gave representations. … The Court heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the learned Additional Advocate General for the respondents 3 and 4 and also the learned Additional

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 16 2009

The Managing Director Tamil Nadu Housing Board and the Executive Engin ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-16-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4(1), 16, 23(1A) and 23(2); Tamil Nadu Housing Board Act 1961 - Sections 72; Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Act, 1996 - Sections 16, 16A, 16B and 48B

Reported in : (2009)6MLJ615

that the lands would be dealt with in terms of Section 72 of the Tamil Nadu Housing Board Act 1961 and the Tamil Nadu Housing Board did not give any consent for reconveyance. The respondents again made another … Even assuming that the land is forfeited and is available for consideration of an application for reconveyance under Section 48B, the owner has no automatic right for reconveyance. In that context, this Court could direct the Government to … Pleader appearing for the appellant State and Mr. P.S. Raman, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. D. Veerasekaran, the learned Counsel appearing for the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 2009

Dharmalingam, Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Secretary t ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-05-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4(1), 6, 6(3), 9, 16, 16A, 16B, 17A, 23(1A), 23(2), 39 and 48B; Tamil Nadu Housing Board Act, 1961 - Sections 162; City Improvement Trust Act, 1950; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 - Sections 9, 9B, 17(2), 18, 20, 36 and 40; MRTP Act - Sections 126; Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1996; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 31, 162 and 300A

Reported in : (2009)6MLJ757

land in Housing Board under Section 17-A. In view of Section 162 of the Tamil Nadu Housing Board Act, 1961, the City Improvement Trust Act, 1950 was repealed and consequently, Section 17-A was also repealed. In the circumstances, … obliged to pass an order forfeiting the land as penalty and in turn to reconvey the same under Section 48B of the Act to the petitioners.(ii) The CMDA has got no power to transfer the land either to … in W.P. Nos. 45825 to 45828 of 2006; Mr. P.S.Raman, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the Government as well as the CMDA and Mr.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial