Advanced Search Results

An Advocate Vs. Disciplinary Committee

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 36B(1)

Reported in : ILR1992KAR2816; 1993(2)KarLJ318

No. 1 it was reconstituted and the proceedings were continued as provided under Section 36A of the Advocates Act, 1961. On 19-1-1992 the petitioner filed a Memo stating that the proceedings pending before respondent No. 1 stood transferred … raised in this Writ Petition in brief are:The petitioner is a practicing Advocate. The third respondent filed complaint alleging misconduct on the part of the … stating that the proceedings pending before respondent No. 1 stood transferred to the Bar Council of India under Section 36B(1) of the Act, as the complaint was made on 26-7-1990 and the period of one year had expired

Devendra Bhai Shankar Mehta Vs. Rameshchandra Vithaldas Sheth and Anot ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35, 36B and 43; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Inocme-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 230A

Reported in : AIR1992SC1398; 1993(41)BLJR17; JT1992(3)SC560; 1992(1)SCALE875; (1992)3SCC473; [1992]2SCR687; 1992(2)LC303(SC); (1992)2UPLBEC803

36B under Section 43 of Advocates' Act, 1961. Civil - fraud - Sections 35, 36 and 43 of Advocate Act, 1961 - advocate and his racket fraudulently took money from complainants - disciplinary committee of Bar Council of India

Samarjit Ghosh Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35 and 36B; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 144 and 340

Reported in : (2006)1CALLT102(HC)

4, 2002, and hence at the expiration of one year from that date, the legal fiction contemplated by section 36B of the Advocates Act, 1961 stood automatically activated; and as a result the disciplinary committee of the council … council to refer the case to its disciplinary committee has been cast by section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961. It has not created any right of the advocate concerned to be noticed and heard before the reference

Sri Brojo Gopal Bhattachryya Vs. Bar Council of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21 and 226;; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35(3), 36(2), 36(1), 36(B), 37, 38 and 44

Reported in : (2000)1CALLT77(HC)

formed the subject matter of disciplinary proceedings initiated against the appellant in terms of section 35 read with section 36B of the Advocates Act. 1961. On 11.5.94 accordingly, an order was passed by the Disciplinary Committee (No.2) of … as an Advocate with the Respondent No. 1, Bar Council of West Bengal in terms of the Advocates Act. 1961. It appears that a complaint in respect of and against the aforesaid enrolment of the appellant was received

L.D. Jaisinghani Vs. Naraindas N. Punjabi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 36B

Reported in : AIR1976SC373; (1976)1SCC354; 1976(8)LC68(SC)

was transferred to the Disciplinary committee of the Bar Council of India under Section 36B of the Advocates Act, 1961 for disposal.2. The complaint alleged as follows:He was the co-owner with two others of certain premises of which … M.H. Beg, J.1. The appellant is an Advocate against whom a complaint was made on 25th May, 1971 before the Bar Council of Maharashtra by the

V.P. Kumaravelu Vs. the Bar Council of India, New Delhi and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Miscellaneous

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 36B(1)

Reported in : AIR1997SC1014; 1997(2)BLJR1553; 1997(1)Crimes254(SC); JT1997(2)SC300; (1997)2MLJ89(SC); 1997(1)SCALE685; (1997)4SCC266; (1997)2UPLBEC1001

to the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India under the provisions of Section 36B(1) of the Advocates Act, 1961 as the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu could not dispose of these … the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India under the provisions of Section 36B(1) of the Advocates Act, 1961 as the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu could not dispose of these cases within

Pawan Kumar Sharma Vs. Gurdial Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 36B; Bar Council of India Rules, 1961 - Rule 47

Reported in : 1998VIIAD(SC)361; AIR1999SC98; 1998(3)BLJR2204; 1998LC757(SC); JT1998(6)SC593; (1999)IMLJ108(SC); RLW1999(1)SC157; 1998(5)SCALE444b; (1998)7SCC24; [1998]Supp2SCR28; 1999(1

the order of the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India dated 11-4-1998. No costs. Act/Rule/Orders: Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 36B; Bar Council of India Rules, 1961 - Rule 47 - LABOUR & SERVICES Promotion: [Tarun … the filing of this appeal need a brief notice :2. Respondent is the complainant against the appellant - advocate. On 28.8.1991, he filed a complaint alleging that the appellant was doing 'taxi business' and had at the

B.L. Samdaria Vs. Harak Chand JaIn and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Miscellaneous

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 136; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 36, 38 and 44; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 47, Rule 1; Motor Vehicles Act

Reported in : AIR1990SC2213; 1991Supp(1)SCC193

one year, it stood automatically transferred to the Bar Council of India under Section 36B of the Advocates Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as 'the Act'). The Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India disposed of the complaint … dated 30th January, 1987. 2. Respondent No. 1 had filed a complaint dated 10th February, 1982 against the Advocate-petitioner (hereinafter referred to as 'the petitioner') before the Bar Council of Rajasthan. In the complaint, respondent No. 1

Ajitsinh Arjunsinh Gohil Vs. Bar Council of Gujarat and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

is whether after transfer of a disciplinary proceeding, as per the mandate enshrined under Section 36B(1) of the Advocates Act, 1961 (for brevity, “the Act”) to the Bar Council of India (BCI) from the State Bar Council, … whether after transfer of a disciplinary proceeding, as per the mandate enshrined under Section 36B(1) of the Advocates Act, 1961 (for brevity, “the Act”) to the Bar Council of India (BCI) from the State Bar Council, can the

Harish Chandra Tiwari Vs. Baiju

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35, 36B(2) and 38; Prevention of Corruption Act

Reported in : AIR2002SC548; 2002(2)ALT10(SC); (2002)1CALLT16(SC); (2002)2CompLJ264(SC); [2002(1)JCR397(SC)]; JT2002(1)SC1; (2002)1MLJ139(SC); RLW2002(1)SC161; 2002(1)SCALE43; (2002)2SCC6

for a period of three years.2. The delinquent advocate filed this appeal under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'). We told him that in the event of this Court upholding the finding of … The complaint and the proceedings later stood transferred to the Bar Council of India by virtue of Section 36B(2) of the Act. The disciplinary committee after conducting the inquiry, came to the conclusion that the affidavit dated