Advanced Search Results

Mahipal Singh Rana Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Etiquettes and Ethics) Regulations, 2002, National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993, Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959, Actuaries Act, 2006, Gujarat Professional Civil Engineers Act, 2006, Representation of Peoples Act, 1951, containing provisions for disqualifying a person from … the contempt action was not barred by Section 20 of the Act. 32. In the present case the alleged contempt was committed in the court … ….Appellant VERSUS State of Uttar Pradesh ....Respondent JUDGMENT ANIL R. DAVE, J.1. The present appeal is preferred under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) against the judgment and

Philips Electronics India Limited and anr. Vs. the Workmen of Philips ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2A, 2(S), 10(1) and 12(5); Maharashtra Recognised Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act; Income Tax Act, 1961; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(3)ALLMR500; 2007(6)BomCR441; (2007)IILLJ786Bom

compensation. It is also alleged that the company assured the union about replacement of well known firm of Actuaries having long standing and established links with the company. Reference has been made to the promise given in … issue rendered by the Court below vide its order dated 30th September, 2006 is sought to be quashed and set aside. The Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai … case. This is clear from para 31 and 32 of the deposition of the companys witness as … the employees concerned in the proceeding are covered under the ambit of 'Workman' as per provisions of I.D. Act? (ii) Whether the grievance made on behalf of the employees is an 'Industrial dispute'? (iii) Whether the second … its order dated 12th April, 2005. Jurisdiction of the State Govt. Under Section 10(1) read with 12(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short

Reshma Kumari and ors. Vs. Madan Mohan and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110B; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 92A, 110A, 140, 163A, 166 and 168; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Actuaries Act, 2006; Statement of Objects and Reasons to Act, 1994

Reported in : JT2009(10)SC90; RLW2010(1)SC361; 2009(10)SCALE90:2009AIRSCW6999; (2009)13SCC422

have to be met entirely out of the relevant portion of the lump sum.29. The Parliament enacted the Actuaries Act, 2006. However, its activities are little known. We do not know whether any Actuarial Society has come into effect. … and mother of the deceased filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, New Delhi, under Sections 110A and 92A of the Act.By an award dated 13th July, 1992 the Tribunal awarded a sum of … decision of House of Lords in Wells v. Wells [1998] 3 W.L.R. 329. It was a case where the plaintiff had sustained serious injuries classified

Commissioner of Income Tax-iv Vs. Insilco Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 210A, 211(3A), 211(3B) and 211(3C); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 32, 36, 37, 145(1) and 145(2); Wealth Tax Act; Bonus Act; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2)

Reported in : (2009)222CTR(Del)641; [2010]321ITR322(Delhi); [2009]179TAXMAN55(Delhi)

ITAT was correct in law in allowing depreciation of Rs 35,41,123/- to the assessee on spare parts Under Section 32 of the Act as against Rs 5,49,806/- allowed by the Assessing Officer.9. In regard to the aforesaid issue, … the aforementioned scheme.4.2 Based on the provisions of the scheme, the assessee engaged an Actuary to make an actuarial calculation as regards the provision which it would be required to make in respect of the liability on

State of West Bengal Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

was against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as “CERC”) dated 3rd October, 2006 determining the tariff 2 chargeable by the Damodar Valley Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Corporation”) from the consumers … 1948. Some of the said provisions are to be found in Sections 32, 37, 38, 39 and 40 of the Act of 1948 which deals … the Corporation. The tariff has been determined under the provisions of Section 61 and 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “2003 Act”) read with such other provisions of the Damodar Valley Corporation Act,

Bhaskar Shrachi Alloys Limited Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

was against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as “CERC”) dated 3rd October, 2006 determining the tariff 2 chargeable by the Damodar Valley Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Corporation”) from the consumers … 1948. Some of the said provisions are to be found in Sections 32, 37, 38, 39 and 40 of the Act of 1948 which deals … the Corporation. The tariff has been determined under the provisions of Section 61 and 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “2003 Act”) read with such other provisions of the Damodar Valley Corporation Act,

Central Electricity Regul. Commission Vs. Damodar Valley Corp.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

was against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as “CERC”) dated 3rd October, 2006 determining the tariff 2 chargeable by the Damodar Valley Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Corporation”) from the consumers … 1948. Some of the said provisions are to be found in Sections 32, 37, 38, 39 and 40 of the Act of 1948 which deals … the Corporation. The tariff has been determined under the provisions of Section 61 and 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “2003 Act”) read with such other provisions of the Damodar Valley Corporation Act,

State of Jharkhand Vs. Damodar Valley Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

was against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as “CERC”) dated 3rd October, 2006 determining the tariff 2 chargeable by the Damodar Valley Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Corporation”) from the consumers … 1948. Some of the said provisions are to be found in Sections 32, 37, 38, 39 and 40 of the Act of 1948 which deals … the Corporation. The tariff has been determined under the provisions of Section 61 and 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as “2003 Act”) read with such other provisions of the Damodar Valley Corporation Act,

Futter and Another Vs. the Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

will, on occasion (indeed, quite often) include taking advice from appropriate experts, whether the experts are lawyers, accountants, actuaries, surveyors, scientists or whomsoever. It is, however for advisers to advise and for trustees to decide: trustees may … her advisers became aware of the inheritance tax liabilities in 2003. In 2006 Mr Pitt (by a litigation friend) and the trustees of the SNT … prior interest (typically a parent with a prior life interest). Such powers were so much common form that section 32 of the Trustee Act 1925 provided a default power, which could be excluded or (as often happened) extended

Cit Vs. Bharat Alumunium Co. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(11), 3.5D, 31(1), 32, 32(1), 37, 41, 41(2), 43, 43B, 80HHC, 82, 139(1) and 254; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2); Income Tax Act, 1986; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Income Tax Rules - Rule 5 and 5(2); Income Tax (Amendment) Act

Reported in : [2010]187TAXMAN111(Delhi)

not take contrary view that this expenditure was no allowable. Therefore, even if it was not allowed under Section 32 of the Act, as there was no ownership of the assets vested in the assessee, claim was allowable … Income Tax, Karnataka : 245 ITR 428 has held that provision for leave encashment on the basis of actuarial variation is on unascertained liability and not a contingent liability. The only dispute raised by the Department was … discuss and decide these issues one by one.2. ITA No. 532 of 2006We may mentions at the outset that some of the issues raised in