Citation network
Goett Vs. Union Carbide Corp.
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Jan 18, 1960
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Goett v. UnionSearch
-
Carbide Corp. - 361 U.S. 340 (1960) U.S. Supreme Court Goett v. UnionSearch
-
Carbide Corp., 361 U.S. 340 (1960) Goett v. UnionSearch
-
U.S. 923. This case was decided in the lower courts before the decision of this Court in The Tungus v. SkovgaardSearch
-
to be applied to maritime torts within the territorial jurisdictions of the States in wrongful death cases. See Hess v. UnitedSearch
-
Act incorporates this standard of the general maritime law in death actions involving maritime torts. Cf. Barr v. MatteoSearch
-
For examples of the general maritime law's concept of negligence, see Kermarec v. CompagnieSearch
-
Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSearch
-
DOUGLAS, and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN join this opinion, but solely under compulsion of the Court's ruling in The Tungus v. SkovgaardSearch
-
as in The Tungus, and is not the measure of recovery when it militates against the defendant, as in Hess v. UnitedSearch
-
of it has engendered among its original subscribers. See the various separate opinions in this case and in Hess v. UnitedSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
of action did not rest upon state substantive law, which, in maritime wrongful death actions, controls, The Tungus v. SkovgaardSearch
-
U. S. 588 , if, as I expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hess v. UnitedSearch
-
one. The Court does not suggest that the limits of this discretion were exceeded in this instance. Cf. Barr v. MatteoSearch
-
Virginia Wrongful Death statute, and properly decided it on that basis. The Court's opinion says that The Tungus v. SkovgaardSearch
-
of exclusive admiralty jurisdiction, and are to be measured by the standards of the general maritime law, Kermarec v. CompagnieSearch
-
of the general maritime law as to interfere with its proper nationwide harmony and uniformity, Southern Pacific Co. v. JensenSearch
-
and completely out of respondent's control -- points we thoroughly explored and decided only the other day. West v. UnitedSearch
-
in The Tungus v. SkovgaardSearch
-
in accord with the principles confirmed by this Court last Term in The Tungus. In Continental Casualty Co. v. TheSearch
-
Contrast Hess v. UnitedSearch
-
Only last month, we unanimously held that this view of the scope of unseaworthiness liability is correct. West v. UnitedSearch
-
The law took a different turn with respect to state workmen's compensation laws. See Southern Pacific Co. v. JensenSearch
-
Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSearch
-
Standard Dredging Co. v. MurphySearch
-
U. S. 306 , 319 U. S. 309 . Cf. Davis v. DepartmentSearch
-
Hahn v. RossSearch
-
Turner v. WilsonSearch
-
Halecki v. UnitedSearch
-
Lee v. PureSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Goett v. UnionSearch
-
See Hess v. UnitedSearch
-
Cf. Barr v. MatteoSearch
-
Kermarec v. CompagnieSearch
-
Hess v. UnitedSearch
-
West v. UnitedSearch
-
The Tungus. In Continental Casualty Co. v. TheSearch
-
See Southern Pacific Co. v. JensenSearch
-
Cf. Davis v. DepartmentSearch
-
Turner v. WilsonSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial