Skip to content
Back to judgment

Citation network

Kinsella Vs. Singleton

Cites for this judgment

  • US Supreme Court
  • Jan 18, 1960

Citation network · 7-day free trial

Brief every cited case in minutes

Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

63 entries 8 linked 55 unlinked
Show
  1. Betts Vs. Brady US Supreme Court · Jun 01, 1942
  2. Powell Vs. Alabama US Supreme Court · Nov 07, 1932
  3. Mcelroy Vs. Guagliardo US Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1960
  4. Johnson Vs. Sayre US Supreme Court · May 06, 1895
  5. Dynes Vs. Hoover US Supreme Court · Jan 01, 1857
  6. Jacob Ruppert Vs. Caffey US Supreme Court · Jan 06, 1920
  7. United States Vs. Classic US Supreme Court · May 26, 1941
  8. Grisham Vs. Hagan US Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1960
  9. U.S. 234 (1960) U.S. Supreme Court Kinsella v. Singleton
    Search
  10. U.S. 234 (1960) Kinsella v. Singleton
    Search
  11. accompanying a member of the armed forces overseas and charged with having committed a noncapital offense there. Reid v. Covert
    Search
  12. Toth v. Quarles
    Search
  13. of the article as applied to civilian dependents charged with capital offenses in the companion cases of Kinsella v. Krueger
    Search
  14. Page 361 U. S. 237 351 U. S. 470 , and Reid v. Covert
    Search
  15. citing In re Ross, 140 U. S. 453 (1891), and the Insular Cases, such as Balzac v. Porto
    Search
  16. entered declaring the article unconstitutional when applied to civilian dependents charged with capital offenses. Reid v. Covert
    Search
  17. consolidated with Kinsella v. Krueger
    Search
  18. as granted in Clause 14. In this field, Toth v. Quarles
    Search
  19. other legal grounds may exist for court-martial jurisdiction as claimed by the Government in No. 37, Wilson v. Bohlender
    Search
  20. post, p. 361 U. S. 281 . See Madsen v. Kinsella
    Search
  21. in 1957 had affected in the least the discipline at armed services installations. We do know that, in one case, Wilson v. Girard
    Search
  22. the safeguards of Article III and the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. Due process cannot create or enlarge power. See Toth v. Quarles
    Search
  23. See also Dynes v. Hoover
    Search
  24. Duncan v. Kalanamoku
    Search
  25. Government's Brief on the Merits in McElroy v. Gagliardo
    Search
  26. U. S. 45 (1932), and Betts v. Brady
    Search
  27. past fate of Article 2(11) in this Court is desirable. At the 1955 Term, there came before the Court in Kinsella v. Krueger
    Search
  28. U. S. 470 , and Reid v. Covert
    Search
  29. cl. 14, but upon In re Ross, 140 U. S. 453 , the so-called Insular Cases, e.g., Balzac v. Porto
    Search
  30. cl. 14 power, and that such power could not be constitutionally applied in those cases. Reid v. Covert
    Search
  31. at 354 U. S. 43 (concurring opinion of FRANKFURTER, J.). As Mr. Justice Brandeis put it in Jacob Ruppert v. Caffey
    Search
  32. United States v. Classic
    Search
  33. that the Fourteenth Amendment requires a State to appoint counsel for an indigent defendant in a capital case, Powell v. Alabama
    Search
  34. U. S. 45 , whereas, in noncapital cases, a defendant has no such absolute right to counsel, Betts v. Brady
    Search
  35. No. 22 is Kinsella v. Singleton
    Search
  36. No. 21 is McElroy v. Guagliardo
    Search
  37. No. 37 is Wilson v. Bohlender
    Search
  38. post, p. 361 U. S. 281 , and No. 58 is Grisham v. Hagan
    Search
  39. the offense having been committed in the American Occupied Zone of West Berlin. Cf. Madsen v. Kinsella
    Search
  40. The cases present grave questions, and, for me, at least, ones of great difficulty. Our recent decision in Reid v. Covert
    Search
  41. trial and punishment of the persons embraced in Article 2(11) of the Code, it may not do so, however reasonable. Reid v. Covert
    Search
  42. Certain aspects of that broad question have recently been determined in Reid v. Covert
    Search
  43. In Duncan v. Kahanamoku
    Search
  44. Emphasis added.) In Toth v. Quarles
    Search
  45. by court-martial for an offense committed in a Brazilian port. 100 U.S. at 100 U. S. 21 -22. Johnson v. Sayre
    Search
  46. As earlier observed, this Court held, in 1879, in Ex parte Reed, supra, and again in 1895, in Johnson v. Sayre
    Search
  47. This opinion applies also to No. 58, Grisham v. Hagan
    Search
  48. No. 21, McElroy v. Guagliardo
    Search
  49. post, p. 361 U. S. 281 , and No. 37, Wilson v. Bohlender
    Search
  50. U.S. Supreme Court Kinsella v. Singleton
    Search

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial