Citation network
Bates Vs. Little Rock
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 23, 1960
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Bates v. LittleSearch
-
Rock - 361 U.S. 516 (1960) U.S. Supreme Court Bates v. LittleSearch
-
Rock, 361 U.S. 516 (1960) Bates v. CitySearch
-
grievances is protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment from invasion by the States. De Jonge v. OregonSearch
-
against heavy-handed frontal attack, but also from being stifled by more subtle governmental interference. Grosjean v. AmericanSearch
-
Smith v. CaliforniaSearch
-
NAACP v. StateSearch
-
to bear only after the exercise of governmental power had threatened to force disclosure of the members' names. NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
upon personal liberty, the State may prevail only upon showing a subordinating interest which is compelling. NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
U. S. 449 . See also Jacobson v. MassachusettsSearch
-
Schneider v. NewSearch
-
Cox v. NewSearch
-
one. No power is more basic to the ultimate purpose and function of government than is the power to tax. See James v. DravoSearch
-
governmental power may sometimes entail the possibility of encroachment upon individual freedom. See United States v. KahrigerSearch
-
Hubbard v. MellonSearch
-
the right of the organizations in these circumstances to assert the individual rights of their members. Cf. NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
has many times held was made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment, as, for illustration, in Jones v. OpelikaSearch
-
Kingsley Intern. Pictures Corp. v. RegentsSearch
-
U. S. 684 . And see cases cited in Speiser v. RandallSearch
-
S. 529 , at 357 U. S. 530 (concurring opinion). Moreover, we believe, as we indicated in United States v. RumelySearch
-
and it is entitled to no less protection than any other First Amendment right, as NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
U. S. 449 , at 357 U. S. 460 , and De Jonge v. OregonSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Bates v. LittleSearch
-
Bates v. CitySearch
-
the States. De Jonge v. OregonSearch
-
Grosjean v. AmericanSearch
-
Jacobson v. MassachusettsSearch
-
See James v. DravoSearch
-
See United States v. KahrigerSearch
-
Cf. NAACP v. AlabamaSearch
-
and De Jonge v. OregonSearch
-
Jones v. OpelikaSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial