Citation network
Nelson Vs. Los Angeles County
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Feb 29, 1960
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Relied / Followed
-
Nelson v. LosSearch
-
Angeles County - 362 U.S. 1 (1960) U.S. Supreme Court Nelson v. LosSearch
-
Angeles County, 362 U.S. 1 (1960) Nelson v. LosSearch
-
to summary discharge. P. 362 U. S. 6 . (c) Globe's discharge was not arbitrary and unreasonable. Slochower v. BoardSearch
-
of Education, 350 U. S. 551 , distinguished. Beilan v. BoardSearch
-
of Education, 357 U. S. 399 , and Lerner v. CaseySearch
-
U. S. 468 , followed. Pp. 362 U. S. 6 -8. (d) The remand on procedural grounds required in Vitarelli v. SeatonSearch
-
his summary discharge was nevertheless arbitrary and unreasonable. In this regard, he places his reliance on Slochower v. BoardSearch
-
for failure to give information which we have held that the State has a legitimate interest in securing. See Garner v. BoardSearch
-
Adler v. BoardSearch
-
had specifically ordered its employees to appear and answer. We conclude that the case is controlled by Beilan v. BoardSearch
-
of Education of Philadelphia, 357 U. S. 399 (1958), and Lerner v. CaseySearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Nor do we believe that the remand on procedural grounds required in Vitarelli v. SeatonSearch
-
they claim their constitutional privilege against self-incrimination before investigating committees. See Slochower v. BoardSearch
-
Page 362 U. S. 11 Beilan v. BoardSearch
-
at which the employee is given at least an opportunity to explain his exercise of the privilege. Board of Education v. MassSearch
-
command. A State could not, I suppose, discharge an employee for attending religious services on Sunday, see Wieman v. UpdegraffSearch
-
the ground that, as a general matter, it could have effected his discharge with a minimum of formality. Cf. Vitarelli v. SeatonSearch
-
also makes it quite clear that Slochower was not being discharged as guilty of the matters inquired about. Daniman v. BoardSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Nelson v. LosSearch
-
Slochower v. BoardSearch
-
Beilan v. BoardSearch
-
and Lerner v. CaseySearch
-
See Garner v. BoardSearch
-
See Slochower v. BoardSearch
-
Board of Education v. MassSearch
-
Cf. Vitarelli v. SeatonSearch
-
Daniman v. BoardSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial